Recent increases in the frequency and scale of wildfires worldwide have raised concerns about the influence of climate change and associated socio-economic costs. In the western U.S., the hazard of wildfire has been increasing for decades. Here, we use a combination of physical, epidemiological, and economic models to estimate the economic impacts of California wildfires in 2018, including the value of destroyed and damaged capital, the health costs related to air pollution exposure, and indirect losses due to broader economic disruption cascading along with regional and national supply chains. Our estimation shows that wildfire damages in 2018 totaled $148.5 (126.1-192.9) billion (roughly 1.5% of California's annual GDP), with $27.7 billion (19%) in capital losses, $32.2 billion (22%) in health costs, and $88.6 billion (59%) in indirect losses. Our results reveal that the majority of economic impacts related to California wildfires may be indirect and often affect industry sectors and locations distant from the fires (e.g., 52% of the indirect losses-31% of total losses-in 2018 were outside of California). Our findings and methods provide new information for decision-makers tasked with protecting lives and key production sectors and reducing the economic damages of future wildfires.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Results presented provide insight into light duty FCEV deployment strategies that can achieve maximum reductions in ozone and PM 2.5 and will assist decision makers in developing effective transportation sector AQ mitigation strategies.

Air quality associated public health co-benefit may emerge from climate and energy policies aimed at reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, the distribution of these co-benefits has not been carefully studied, despite the opportunity to tailor mitigation efforts so they achieve maximum benefits within socially and economically disadvantaged communities (DACs). Here, we quantify such health co-benefits from different long-term, low-carbon scenarios in California and their distribution in the context of social vulnerability. The magnitude and distribution of health benefits, including within impacted communities, is found to varies among scenarios which reduce economy wide GHG emissions by 80% in 2050 depending on the technology- and fuel-switching decisions in individual end-use sectors. The building electrification focused decarbonization strategy achieves ~15% greater total health benefits than the truck electrification focused strategy which uses renewable fuels to meet building demands. Conversely, the enhanced electrification of the truck sector is shown to benefit DACs more effectively. Such tradeoffs highlight the importance of considering environmental justice implications in the development of climate mitigation planning.