Intrinsically disordered proteins play an important role in cellular signalling, mediated by their interactions with other biomolecules. A key question concerns the nature of their binding mechanism, and whether the bound structure is induced only by proximity to the binding partner. This is difficult to answer through experiment alone because of the very heterogeneous nature of the unbound ensemble, and the probable rapid interconversion of the various unbound structures. Here we report the most extensive set of simulations on NCBD to date: we use large-scale replica exchange molecular dynamics to explore the unbound state. An important feature of the study is the use of an atomistic force field that has been parametrised against experimental data for weakly structured peptides, together with an accurate explicit water model. Neither the force field nor the starting conformations are biased towards a particular structure. The regions of NCBD that have high helical propensity in the simulations correspond closely to helices in the ‘core’ unbound conformation determined by NMR, although no single member of the simulated unbound ensemble closely resembles the core conformation, or either of the two known bound conformations. We have validated the results against NMR spectroscopy and SAXS measurements, obtaining reasonable agreement. The two helices which most stabilise the binding of NCBD with ACTR are formed readily; the third helix, which is less important for binding but is involved in most of the intraprotein contacts of NCBD in the bound conformation, is formed more rarely, and tends not to coexist with the other helices. These results support a mechanism by which NCBD gains the advantages of disorder, while forming binding-competent structures in the unbound state. We obtain support for this mechanism from coarse-grained simulations of NCBD with, and without, its binding partner.
Recent investigations of possible downhill folding of small proteins such as BBL have focused on the thermodynamics of non-two-state, "barrierless" folding/denaturation transitions. Downhill folding is noncooperative and thermodynamically "one-state," a phenomenon underpinned by a unimodal conformational distribution over chain properties such as enthalpy, hydrophobic exposure, and conformational dimension. In contrast, corresponding distributions for cooperative two-state folding are bimodal with well-separated population peaks. Using simplified atomic modeling of a three-helix bundle-in a scheme that accounts for hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonding-and coarse-grained C(alpha) models of four real proteins with various degrees of cooperativity, we evaluate the effectiveness of several observables at defining the underlying distribution. Bimodal distributions generally lead to sharper transitions, with a higher heat capacity peak at the transition midpoint, compared with unimodal distributions. However, the observation of a sigmoidal transition is not a reliable criterion for two-state behavior, and the heat capacity baselines, used to determine the van't Hoff and calorimetric enthalpies of the transition, can introduce ambiguity. Interestingly we find that, if the distribution of the single-molecule radius of gyration were available, it would permit discrimination between unimodal and bimodal underlying distributions. We investigate kinetic implications of thermodynamic noncooperativity using Langevin dynamics. Despite substantial chevron rollovers, the relaxation of the models considered is essentially single-exponential over an extended range of native stabilities. Consistent with experiments, significant deviations from single-exponential behavior occur only under strongly folding conditions.
Many proteins undergo a conformational transition upon binding to their cognate binding partner, with intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) providing an extreme example in which a folding transition occurs. However, it is often not clear whether this occurs via an "induced fit" or "conformational selection" mechanism, or via some intermediate scenario. In the first case, transient encounters with the binding partner favour transitions to the bound structure before the two proteins dissociate, while in the second the bound structure must be selected from a subset of unbound structures which are in the correct state for binding, because transient encounters of the incorrect conformation with the binding partner are most likely to result in dissociation. A particularly interesting situation involves those intrinsically disordered proteins which can bind to different binding partners in different conformations. We have devised a multi-state coarse-grained simulation model which is able to capture the binding of IDPs in alternate conformations, and by applying it to the binding of nuclear coactivator binding domain (NCBD) to either ACTR or IRF-3 we are able to determine the binding mechanism. By all measures, the binding of NCBD to either binding partner appears to occur via an induced fit mechanism. Nonetheless, we also show how a scenario closer to conformational selection could arise by choosing an alternative non-binding structure for NCBD. © 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.