No abstract

No abstract

To determine whether postmenopausal bone loss and factors associated with osteoporosis affect tooth retention, we examined vertebral and proximal femoral (postcranial) bone mineral density in relation to tooth loss and attachment loss in a cross-sectional study of 135 postmenopausal women (age range 41-70 yr). Women had at least 10 teeth and no evidence of moderate or severe periodontal disease. Full-mouth attachment loss measurements were made using a pressure-sensitive probe, and bone density was determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Attachment loss was correlated with tooth loss (number of remaining teeth, radiologically determined), but not with vertebral or proximal femur bone density. Multivariate analysis showed current smoking (p = 0.01), years since menopause (p = 0.02) and the interaction of age and current smoking (p < 0.01), to be statistically significant predictors of attachment loss in our study population.

This study was undertaken to demonstrate that the fractal dimensions calculated using digitized non-standardized, clinical radiographs of mandibular alveolar bone from a population of patients diagnosed with periodontitis are statistically different from fractal dimensions calculated from another population diagnosed as having gingivitis or healthy gingiva. The fractal dimension was calculated using a public domain fractal analysis program distributed by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Fractal dimensions were calculated from digitized clinical radiographs for 29 patients diagnosed with healthy gingiva and/or gingivitis and 32 patients diagnosed with periodontitis and compared. To estimate the reproducibility of the technique, we recalculated the fractal dimension from images of the gingivitis patients 3 months after the original calculations and compared them to the originals. A 2 sample, 2-tailed Student t test showed the gingivitis data group to be different from the periodontitis data group (P = 0.0012). The original gingivitis and repeat gingivitis groups fractal dimension calculation were the same and analysis showed the two data sets were not significantly different (P = 0.99). We found that: 1) fractal dimensions could be used to distinguish between gingivitis and periodontitis patient groups; 2) fractal dimensions could be calculated from non-standardized clinical radiographs; and 3) fractal dimensions for gingivitis patients were reproducible over a 3-month period.

No abstract

No abstract

These in vitro studies support the concept that EMP may act as a suitable matrix for PDLF.

No abstract