Arrests for driving while impaired substantially increase the risk of eventual death in an alcohol-related crash. Aggressive intervention in the cases of people arrested for driving while impaired may decrease the likelihood of a future fatal alcohol-related crash.
We report a population-based study of housefire deaths in North Carolina in 1985 using data obtained from fire investigators and the North Carolina medical examiner system. The crude death rate was 3.2 per 100,000 population; age-specific death rates were highest for ages 75-84 years. Death rates for Whites were one-third as high as death rates for other races. Of those decedents tested for alcohol, 56 percent had blood alcohol levels -22 mmol/L. Most fatal fires were caused by heating units or cigarettes. (Am J
Background Artificial reality technologies are currently being explored as potential options to improve surgical education. Previous studies have primarily examined the efficacy of artificial reality in laparoscopic procedures, but to our knowledge, none have been performed in orthopaedically relevant procedures such as intramedullary tibial nailing, which calls for more versatile large-scale movements. Questions/purposes Does a virtual reality simulator with or without a standard technique guide result in (1) a higher proportion of participants who completed the insertion of an intramedullary tibial nail in a synthetic bones model and (2) greater procedural accuracy than does training with a technique guide alone? Methods Twenty-five first- and second-year medical students without prior exposure to intramedullary tibial nail insertion were recruited. Participants were randomly assigned to the technique guide control group (n = 8), the virtual reality group (n = 8), or the virtual reality and technique guide group (n = 9). The technique guide was adapted from a commercially available technique guide, which participants in the assigned groups could use to prepare as much as desired. The virtual reality simulation was based on the same procedure, and we used a commercially available virtual reality simulator that we purchased for this task. Participants in the virtual reality experimental groups completed the simulation on three separate sessions, at a set interval of 3 to 4 days apart. After 10 to 14 days of preparation, all participants attempted to insert an intramedullary nail into an intact, compact bone-model tibia that lacked surrounding soft tissue. Participants were given written hints if requested, but no other assistance was given. A procedure was considered complete if the nail and screw were properly placed. Procedural accuracy was defined as the number of incorrect steps normalized out of the 16 possible performed. After the procedure, one orthopaedic surgeon assessed a blinded video of the participant performing it so the assessor could not recognize the individual or that individual’s gender. Additionally, the assessor was unaware of which group each participant had been randomized to during the evaluation. Results A higher proportion of participants in the virtual reality group (6 of 8) and the virtual reality and technique guide group (7 of 9) completed the intramedullary nail than did participants in the technique guide group (2 of 8; p = 0.01). There was no difference in completion between the virtual reality groups (p = 0.89). Participants in the virtual reality and virtual reality and technique guide had fewer normalized incorrect steps than did participants in the technique guide group (3.2 ± 0.1 of 16 and 3.1 ± 0.1 of 16 versus 5.7 ± 0.2 of 16, respectively; p = 0.02 for comparisons of virtual reality groups to technique guide, p = 0.63 between the virtual reality group). Conclusions Virtual reality increased both procedural accuracy and the completion proportion compared with a technique guide in medical students. Based on our findings, virtual reality may help residents learn the procedural workflow and movements required to perform surgical procedures. Future studies should examine how and when exactly the technology can be applied to residencies and its impact on residents. Level of Evidence Level I, therapeutic study.
Background: Osteoarthritis may be caused by or concurrent with diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis or systemic lupus erythematosus, which rely on chronic corticosteroids regimens for treatment. If a total knee or hip arthroplasty is needed, this chronic treatment method has been associated with poorer surgical outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis of data collected by the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was conducted. The Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify 403,566 total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty patients who were then stratified by the use of chronic corticosteroids for univariate analysis. Results: Forteen thousand seven hundred seventy-four of the patients identified were prescribed chronic corticosteroid regimens. A statistically significant difference was observed in perioperative complications for patients prescribed with corticosteroids, including higher rates of surgical site infection ( P = 0.0001), occurrence of deep incisional surgical site infection ( P < 0.0001), occurrences of organ space surgical site infection ( P < 0.0001), wound dehiscence ( P < 0.0001), general would infection ( P < 0.0001), pneumonia ( P < 0.0001), occurrences of unplanned intubation ( P = 0.0002), urinary tract infection ( P < 0.0001), and readmission ( P < 0.0001). No statistically significant difference was observed in the 30-day mortality between the 2 groups (0.63), venous thromboembolic event (0.42), cerebrovascular accident (0.12), myocardial infarction (0.49), cardiac arrest (0.098), deep vein thrombosis (0.17), or sepsis (0.52). Conclusion: Many of the notable differences in complications may be directly attributed to the immunosuppressive nature of corticosteroids. With increased knowledge of which perioperative complications to monitor, surgeons can tailor treatment strategies to this population that reduce morbidity and improve outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.