The mammalian high mobility group proteins HMG1 and HMG2 are abundant, chromatin-associated proteins whose cellular function is not known. In this study we show that these proteins can substitute for the prokaryotic DNA-bending protein HU in promoting the assembly of the Hin invertasome, an intermediate structure in Hin-mediated site-specific DNA inversion. Formation of this complex requires the assembly of the Hin recombinase, the Fis protein, and three cis-acting DNA sites, necessitating the looping of intervening DNA segments. Invertasome assembly is strongly stimulated by HU or HMG proteins when one of these segments is shorter than 104 bp. By use of ligase-mediated circularization assays, we demonstrate that HMG1 and HMG2 can bend DNA extremely efficiently, forming circles as small as 66 bp, and even 59-bp circles at high HMG protein concentrations. In both invertasome assembly and circularization assays, substrates active in the presence of HMG1 contain one less helical turn of DNA compared with substrates active in the presence of HU protein. Analysis of different domains of HMG1 generated by partial proteolytic digestion indicate that DNA-binding domain B is sufficient for both bending and invertasome assembly. We suggest that an important biological function of HMG1 and HMG2 is to facilitate cooperative interactions between cis-acting proteins by promoting DNA flexibility. A general role for HMG1 and HMG2 in chromatin structure is also suggested by their ability to wrap DNA duplexes into highly compact forms.

The combined results demonstrate that the Hin dimer interface is of critical importance for the activation of catalysis and imply that interactions with the Fis-bound enhancer may trigger a conformational adjustment within the region that is important for concerted DNA cleavage within both recombination sites, and possibly for the subsequent exchange of DNA strands.

Site‐specific DNA inversion by the Hin recombinase requires the formation of a multicomponent nucleo‐protein structure called an invertasome. In this structure, the two recombination sites bound by Hin are assembled together at the Fis‐bound recombinational enhancer with the requisite looping of the intervening DNA segments. We have analyzed the role of the HU protein in invertasome assembly when the enhancer is located at variable positions close to one of the recombination sites. In the absence of HU in vitro and in hupA hupB mutant cells in vivo, invertasome assembly is very inefficient when there is < 104 bp of DNA between the enhancer and recombination site. Invertasome assembly in the presence of HU in vitro or in vivo displayed a periodicity beginning with 60 bp of intervening DNA that reflected its helical repeat. The average helical repeat for this DNA region was calculated by autocorrelation and Fourier transformation to be 11.2 bp per turn for supercoiled DNA both in the presence of HU in vitro and in hup+ cells in vivo. HU is the only protein in Escherichia coli that can promote invertasome formation with short DNA lengths between the enhancer and recombination sites. However, the presence of certain polyamines and a protein activity present in HeLa nuclear extracts can efficiently substitute for HU in invertasome assembly. These data support a model in which HU binds non‐specifically to the DNA between the enhancer and recombination site to facilitate DNA looping.

The Hin DNA invertase becomes catalytically activated when assembled in an invertasome complex containing two Fis dimers bound to an enhancer segment. The region of Fis responsible for transactivation of Hin contains a mobile ␤-hairpin arm that extends from each dimer subunit. We show here that whereas both Fis dimers must be capable of activating Hin, Fis heterodimers that have only one functional activating ␤-arm are sufficient to form catalytically competent invertasomes. Analysis of homodimer and heterodimer mixes of different Hin mutants suggests that Fis must activate each subunit of the two Hin dimers that participate in catalysis. These experiments also indicate that all four Hin subunits must be coordinately activated prior to initiation of the first chemical step of the reaction and that the process of activation is independent of the catalytic steps of recombination. We propose a molecular model for the invertasome structure that is consistent with current information on protein-DNA structures and the topology of the DNA strands within the recombination complex. In this model, a single Fis activation arm could contact amino acids from both Hin subunits at the dimer interface to induce a conformational change that coordinately positions the active sites close to the scissile phosphodiester bonds.

Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) mediates the host response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) by promoting the activation of pro-and anti-inflammatory cytokine genes. To activate each gene, numerous signal transduction pathways are required. The adaptor proteins MyD88 and TIRAP contribute to the activation of several and possibly all pathways via direct interactions with TLR4's Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (IL-1R) (TIR) domain. However, additional adaptors that are required for the activation of specific subsets of pathways may exist, which could contribute to the differential regulation of target genes. Furthermore, it remains unknown whether direct interactions that have been reported between TIR domains and other proteins are required for TLR4 signaling. To address these issues, we systematically mutated the TLR4 TIR domain in the context of a CD4/TLR4 fusion protein. Several exposed residues defining at least two structural surfaces were required in macrophages for activation of the proinflammatory IL-12 p40 and anti-inflammatory IL-10 promoters, as well as promoters dependent on individual transcription factors. Interestingly, the same residues were required by all promoters tested, suggesting that the signaling pathways diverge downstream of the adaptors. The mutant phenotypes provide a framework for future studies of TLR4 signaling, as the interaction supported by each critical surface residue will need to be defined.