C Co on ns se er rv va at ti io on n o of f c co or re e g ge en ne e e ex xp pr re es ss si io on n i in n v ve er rt te eb br ra at te e t ti is ss su ue es s Esther T Chan* ¶ , Gerald T Quon † ¶ , Gordon Chua ‡ ¶¥ , Tomas Babak ¶# , Miles Trochesset † ‡ , Ralph A Zirngibl*, Jane Aubin*, Michael JH Ratcliffe § , Andrew Wilde*, Michael Brudno † ‡ ¶ , Quaid D Morris* † ‡ ¶ and Timothy R Hughes* ‡ ¶ A Ab bs st tr ra ac ct t B Ba ac ck kg gr ro ou un nd d Vertebrates share the same general body plan and organs, possess related sets of genes, and rely on similar physiological mechanisms, yet show great diversity in morphology, habitat and behavior. Alteration of gene regulation is thought to be a major mechanism in phenotypic variation and evolution, but relatively little is known about the broad patterns of conservation in gene expression in non-mammalian vertebrates.R Re es su ul lt ts s We measured expression of all known and predicted genes across twenty tissues in chicken, frog and pufferfish. By combining the results with human and mouse data and considering only ten common tissues, we have found evidence of conserved expression for more than a third of unique orthologous genes. We find that, on average, transcription factor gene expression is neither more nor less conserved than that of other genes. Strikingly, conservation of expression correlates poorly with the amount of conserved nonexonic sequence, even using a sequence alignment technique that accounts for non-collinearity in conserved elements. Many genes show conserved human/fish expression despite having almost no nonexonic conserved primary sequence.C Co on nc cl lu us si io on ns s There are clearly strong evolutionary constraints on tissue-specific gene expression. A major challenge will be to understand the precise mechanisms by which many gene expression patterns remain similar despite extensive cis-regulatory restructuring. [5] initially posited that phenotypic differences among primates are mainly due to adaptive changes in gene regulation, rather than to changes in protein-coding sequence or function, and this idea has accumulated supporting evidence in recent years [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Recent work has indicated that gene expression evolves in a fashion similar to other traits, where in the absence of selection, random mutations introduce variants within a population [11,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Changes negatively affecting fitness are probably eliminated by purifying selection: core cellular processes seem to be coexpressed from yeast to human [20], and conservation of the expression of individual genes in specific tissues has been observed across distantly related vertebrates [21][22][23][24], perhaps reflecting requirements for patterning and development as well as conserved functions of organs, tissues and cell types. Conversely, changes that benefit fitness (for example, under new ecological pressures) may become fixed: changes in gene expression are believed to underlie many differences in morphology, physiology and behavior...
Immunoglobulin gene rearrangement in avian B cell precursors generates surface Ig receptors of limited diversity. It has been proposed that specificities encoded by these receptors play a critical role in B lineage development by recognizing endogenous ligands within the bursa of Fabricius. To address this issue directly we have introduced a truncated surface IgM, lacking variable region domains, into developing B precursors by retroviral gene transfer in vivo. Cells expressing this truncated receptor lack endogenous surface IgM, and the low level of endogenous Ig rearrangements that have occurred within this population of cells has not been selected for having a productive reading frame. Such cells proliferate rapidly within bursal epithelial buds of normal morphology. In addition, despite reduced levels of endogenous light chain rearrangement, those light chain rearrangements that have occurred have undergone variable region diversification by gene conversion. Therefore, although surface expression of an Ig receptor is required for bursal colonization and the induction of gene conversion, the specificity encoded by the prediversified receptor is irrelevant and, consequently, there is no obligate ligand for V(D)Jencoded determinants of prediversified avian cell surface IgM receptor.The rearrangement of chicken Ig genes generates minimal antibody diversity. At the light chain (L) locus, the unique, functional V L 1 gene rearranges to the unique J L segment in all B cells (1). Similarly, at the heavy chain (H) locus, unique V H 1 and J H genes undergo rearrangement with a family of highly conserved D H elements to form a VDJ H complex of limited diversity (2, 3). Junctional diversity is limited further because of the lack of N nucleotide additions in chicken V(D)J junctions (4). A diverse repertoire of B cell specificities is generated by somatic gene-conversion events in which VD H and V L sequences in functionally rearranged VDJ H and VJ L genes are replaced by homologous sequences from upstream V L and V H pseudogenes (⌿V L and ⌿V H ) (2, 5-7).The bursa of Fabricius is the primary site of B cell lymphopoiesis in avian species, and surgical or chemical ablation of the chicken bursa profoundly disrupts the normal progression of B cell development and the generation of diversity by gene conversion (reviewed in refs. 7-10). The bursa is colonized by a single wave of B cell precursors during embryogenesis starting at about embryonic day 8 (E8) and lasting about a week (11). Within the bursa, B cell precursors first are observed in the mesenchymal tissue, and 20,000-40,000 precursors subsequently migrate across the bursal epithelial basement membrane and begin to proliferate in oligoclonal clusters or epithelial buds from which the discrete follicles of the mature bursa are derived (12, 13).Surface Ig (sIg) ϩ B cell precursors first are observed by about E9-E10, and the frequency of such cells increases rapidly during the embryonic period (14). Although Ig gene rearrangement is not intrinsically biased towar...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.