Objective: To determine whether community management of mild to moderate community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP) is as effective and acceptable as standard hospital management of CAP.
Design: Randomised controlled trial.
Setting: Christchurch, New Zealand, primary and secondary care.
Participants: 55 patients presenting or referred to the emergency department at Christchurch Hospital with mild to moderately severe pneumonia, assessed using a validated pneumonia severity assessment score, from July 2002 to October 2003.
Interventions: Hospital treatment as usual or comprehensive care in the home delivered by primary care teams.
Main outcome measures: Primary: days to discharge, days on intravenous (IV) antibiotics, patient‐rated symptom scores. Secondary: health status measured using level of functioning at 2 and 6 weeks, patient satisfaction.
Results: The median number of days to discharge was higher in the home care group (4 days; range, 1–14) than in the hospital groups (2 days; range, 0–10; P = 0.004). There was no difference in the number of days on IV antibiotics or on subsequent oral antibiotics. Patient‐rated symptom scores at 2 and 6 weeks, median change in symptom severity from baseline to 6 weeks, and general functioning at 2 and 6 weeks did not differ between the groups. Patients in both groups were satisfied with their treatment, with a clear preference for community treatment (P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Mild to moderately severe CAP can be managed effectively in the community by primary care teams. This model of comprehensive care at home can be implemented by primary care teams with suitable funding structures.
There is decreased regional perfusion during wakefulness in participants with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea, and these are in brain regions which have shown decreased regional gray matter volume in previous studies in people with severe OSA. Thus, we hypothesize that cerebral perfusion changes are evident before (and possibly underlie) future structural changes.
Despite evidence of a relationship among obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), metabolic dysregulation, and diabetes, it is uncertain whether OSA treatment can improve metabolic parameters. We sought to determine effects of long-term continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment on glycemic control and diabetes risk in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and OSA.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSBlood, medical history, and personal data were collected in a substudy of 888 participants in the Sleep Apnea cardioVascular Endpoints (SAVE) trial in which patients with OSA and stable CVD were randomized to receive CPAP plus usual care, or usual care alone. Serum glucose and glycated hemoglobin A 1c (HbA 1c ) were measured at baseline, 6 months, and 2 and 4 years and incident diabetes diagnoses recorded.
RESULTSMedian follow-up was 4.3 years. In those with preexisting diabetes (n 5 274), there was no significant difference between the CPAP and usual care groups in serum glucose, HbA 1c , or antidiabetic medications during follow-up. There were also no significant between-group differences in participants with prediabetes (n 5 452) or new diagnoses of diabetes. Interaction testing suggested that women with diabetes did poorly in the usual care group, while their counterparts on CPAP therapy remained stable.
CONCLUSIONSAmong patients with established CVD and OSA, we found no evidence that CPAP therapy over several years affects glycemic control in those with diabetes or prediabetes or diabetes risk over standard-of-care treatment. The potential differential effect according to sex deserves further investigation.Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by repeated episodes of upper-airway collapse during sleep that causes intermittent hypoxemia, sleep fragmentation, and daytime sleepiness. The standard therapy for OSA is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to prevent airway obstruction (1).OSA is common in the population and strongly associated with obesity (2). Prospective cohort studies have found associations between moderate to severe OSA and
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.