Key points The female diaphragm fatigues at a slower rate compared to that of males, with blunted cardiovascular consequences (i.e. inspiratory muscle metaboreflex). It is unclear if these findings are a function of relative or absolute diaphragmatic work. We asked if sex differences in diaphragm fatigue and the inspiratory muscle metaboreflex persisted during inspiratory loading performed at equal absolute intensities. We found that matching men and women for absolute diaphragmatic work resulted in an equal degree of diaphragm fatigue, despite women performing significantly greater work relative to body mass. Metabolite‐induced reflex influences in sympathetic outflow originating from the diaphragm are attenuated in women, with potential implications for blood flow distribution during exercise. Abstract In response to inspiratory pressure‐threshold loading (PTL), women have greater inspiratory muscle endurance time, slower rate of diaphragm fatigue development, and a blunted pressor response compared to men. It is unclear if these differences are due to discrepancies in absolute diaphragm force output. We tested the hypothesis that following inspirations performed at equal absolute intensities, females would develop a similar level of diaphragm fatigue and an attenuated cardiovascular response relative to men. Healthy young men (n = 8, age = 24 ± 3 years) and women (n = 8, age = 23 ± 3 years) performed PTL whilst targeting a transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) of 92 cmH2O for 5 min. Diaphragm fatigue was assessed via twitch Pdi (Pdi,tw) using cervical magnetic stimulation. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial blood pressure were monitored continuously. During PTL, the absolute amount of diaphragm work was not different between men (13,399 ± 2019 cmH2O s) and women (12,986 ± 1846 cmH2O s; P > 0.05); however, women performed the PTL task at a higher relative trueP¯di/Pdi,max. Following inspiratory PTL, the magnitude of reduction in Pdi,tw was similar between men (−27.1 ± 7.2%) and women (−23.8 ± 13.8%; P > 0.05). There were significant increases in HR over time (P < 0.05), but this did not differ on the basis of sex (P > 0.05). Mean arterial blood pressure increased significantly over time in both men and women (P < 0.05); however, the rate of change was higher in men (6.24 ± 2.54 mmHg min−1) than in women (4.15 ± 2.52 mmHg min−1) (P < 0.05). We conclude that the female diaphragm is protected against severe fatigue when inspiratory work is excessive and as a result does not evoke overt sympathoexcitation.
Swimmers have a high prevalence of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), which may be associated with repeated exposure to chlorinated pool water. The eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea (EVH) test is used to diagnose EIB; however, it fails to replicate the environmental conditions experienced by swimmers. The relationship between the composition of the EVH inspired gas and the development of EIB from swim exercise remains unclear. Purpose This study aimed to compare the bronchoconstrictive effect of a chlorinated inspirate EVH test and swim test to a laboratory-based EVH test in swimmers. Methods Fifteen collegiate swimmers (n = 5 male, n = 10 female; 21 ± 2 yr) completed 3 d of testing in pseudorandom order; a standard EVH test (EVHL), a pool air EVH test (EVHCl), and a swimming test (Swim). Spirometry was measured at baseline, and 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20 min after each test. Results EVHL elicited a forced expired volume in 1 s (FEV1) fall index of −9.7% ± 6.4% compared with −6.6% ± 9.2% and −3.0% ± 7.5% after EVHCl and Swim, respectively (P < 0.05). Using Bland–Altman analysis, we found good agreement between EVHL and EVHCl (bias = −2.8, r = 0.79; P < 0.05) with poor agreement between EVHL and Swim (bias = −6.7, r = 0.20) and between EVHCl and Swim (bias = −3.9, r = 0.50; both P < 0.05). Forced expired flow between 25% and 75% lung volume and peak expired flow were significantly reduced by the EVHL compared with the EVHCl and Swim tests (P < 0.05). Conclusions EVHL elicits a greater forced expired volume in 1-s fall index compared with EVHCl and Swim. The unique aquatic environment of swimmers potentially protects against bronchoconstriction and should be considered in the determination of EIB.
Intense inspiratory muscle work evokes a sympathetically mediated pressor reflex, termed the respiratory muscle metaboreflex, in which young females demonstrate an attenuated response relative to males. However, the effects of ageing and female sex hormones on the respiratory muscle metaboreflex are unclear. We tested the hypothesis that the pressor response to inspiratory work would be similar between older males and females, and higher relative to their younger counterparts. Healthy, normotensive young (26 ± 3 years) males (YM; n = 10) and females (YF; n = 10), as well as older (64 ± 5 years) males (OM; n = 10) and females (OF; n = 10), performed inspiratory pressure threshold loading (PTL) to task failure. Older adults had a greater mean arterial pressure (MAP) response to PTL than young (P < 0.001). YF had a lower MAP compared to YM (+10 ± 6 vs. +19 ± 15 mmHg, P = 0.026); however, there was no difference observed between OF and OM (+26 ± 11 vs. +27 ± 11 mmHg, P = 0.162). Older adults had a lower heart rate response to PTL than young (P = 0.002). There was no effect of sex between young females and males (+19 ± 9 and +27 ± 11 bpm, P = 0.186) or older females and males (+17 ± 7 and +20 ± 7 bpm, P = 0.753). We conclude the respiratory muscle metaboreflex response is heightened in older adults, and the sex effect between older males and post‐menopause females is absent, suggesting an effect of circulating sex hormones. Key points The arterial blood pressure response to the respiratory muscle metaboreflex is greater in older males and females. Compared to sex‐matched young individuals, there is no sex differences in the blood pressure response between older males and post‐menopause females. Our results suggest the differences between males and females in the cardiovascular response to high levels of inspiratory muscle work is abolished with reduced circulating female sex hormones.
The thorax undergoes unique conditions while swimming. Hydrostatic pressure from water immersion places an external load on the thorax and increases airway resistance, and the horizontal body position results in central venous engorgement and an associated reduction in lung compliance. The aforementioned factors likely increase the work of breathing (W b); however, this hypothesis remains untested. Purpose This study aimed to compare W b during freestyle swimming relative to cycling and to characterize the differences in the cardiorespiratory responses to swimming relative to cycling in the same individuals. Methods Eight collegiate swimmers (four men and four women, age = 22 ± 2 yr) performed an incremental swim test while tethered to a resistance apparatus. On a separate day, subjects performed an incremental cycle test. During swimming and cycling, metabolic and ventilatory parameters were measured using a customized metabolic cart, and inspired W b was quantified using an esophageal balloon catheter. Results Swimming and cycling elicited statistically similar levels of peak oxygen uptake (3.87 ± 0.92 vs 4.20 ± 0.83 L·min−1, P = 0.143). However, peak minute ventilation (V˙ E) (118 ± 3 vs 154 ± 25 L·min−1) and heart rate (164 ± 19 vs 183 ± 8 bpm) were significantly lower during swimming relative to cycling (both P < 0.05). Inspired W b was higher at a V˙ E of 50 L·min−1 (+27 ± 16 J·min−1), 75 L·min−1 (+56 ± 23 J·min−1), and 100 L·min−1 (+53 ± 22 J·min−1) during swimming compared with cycling (all P < 0.05). Periods of interbreath apnea were observed while swimming (duration = 0.13–2.07 s). Conclusion We interpret our findings to mean that the horizontal body position and hydrostatic pressure on the chest wall requires swimmers to generate greater inspiratory pressures to sustain adequate V˙ E during exercise.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.