Exposure of guinea pigs to UVA (320--400 nm) radiation following administration of 8-methoxypsoralen by gavage (referred to by the acronym, PUVA) or exposure to UVB (290--320 nm) radiation, produced suppression of the cutaneous delayed hypersensitivity reaction at the site of exposure to radiation and at distant nonexposed sites. In these experiments, the animals were immunized by injection of dinitrophenyl-bovine gamma-globulin (DNP-BGG) in complete Freund's adjuvant and delayed hypersensitivity responses were provoked by intradermal injections of DNP-BGG, DNP and BGG on the flanks. Exposure to erythemogenic doses of either PUVA or UVB radiation for 7 days prior to immunization and for the 7 days between immunization and challenge (total period of radiation: 14 days) produced inhibiton of responses to each of the test substances. In addition, treatment with erythemogenic doses of PUVA either for 7 days prior to immunization or during the interval between immunization and challenge with DNP-BGG, inhibited the delayed hypersensitivity responses at the site of irradiation and at a nonexposed site. These findings suggest that in vivo exposure to nonionizing radiation leads to both local and systemic alteration of certain immune responses.

Guniea-pigs were sensitized by percutaneous application of dinitrochlorobenzene and exposed to UVB (280-320 nm) radiation. The exposure to radiation diminished the response to an elicitation dose of the hapten administered 14 days later within the site of irradiation. The exposure dose of radiation required to produce this effect resulted in a marked erythemal response, but this response did not conceal the contact allergic reaction. The site of elicitation of the allergic response had to be included in the exposure field.

Four groups of female Dutch-belted rabbits (Oryctulagus cuniculus) were given methoxsalen (12 mg/kg) or placebo by oral intubation and 1 hr later were exposed to UVA for either 2 or 8 hr. This procedure was repeated 5 days each week for 18 mo. A fifth group received no drug and no UVA exposure. The skin of the animals given methoxsalen and UVA showed signs of acute and chronic phototoxicity. Multiple peripheral blood parameters of hepatic, renal and hematologic function were normal and were not different between groups. Complete ophthalmoscopic examinations were performed periodically. No cataracts were seen in any of the animals. This data provides the perspective that in one species the daily dose of methoxsalen and UVA required to induce chronic cutaneous photosensitization is lower than the daily dose required to induce cataracts. It is inadvisable to interpret this data as suggesting that no risk exists for patients being treated with oral methoxsalen photochemotherapy. The experimental evidence supporting photosensitization as a cause of cataracts and implicating a role of lens DNA in this cataractogenesis is reviewed. Because methoxsalen-UVA alterations of lens DNA or protein could lead to delayed onset of cataracts, and because of the serious nature and potential preventability of phototoxic lens opacification, appropriate protective eye wear is recommended for all patients receiving oral psoralen photochemotherapy.

The survival time of full-thickness skin grafts in rabbits was prolonged by administration of methoxsalen and subsequent exposure of the donor and recipient graft sites to longwave ultraviolet radiation (UVA). Erythemogenic doses of radiation were required to prolong graft survival. Similar exposure to mid-ultraviolet radiation (UVB) did not significantly prolong the survival time to grafts.

No abstract

Summary Guinea‐pigs were sensitized by percutaneous application of dinitrochlorobenzene and exposed to UVA (320–400 nm) radiation following systemic administration of methoxsalen. This treatment diminished the response to an elicitation dose of the hapten administered 14 days later within the site of irradiation. The site of elicitation of the allergic response had to be included in the field of exposure, and reduction of the allergic response was observed only when the exposure to radiation was commenced at the time of induction of contact allergy. Established contact skin sensitivity was not affected by radiation.

No abstract

No abstract