The innate immune components that modulate allergic contact hypersensitivity (CHS) responses are poorly defined. Using human skin from contact dermatitis patients and a mouse model of CHS, we find that hapten allergens disrupt the Arginase1 (Arg1) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS or Nos2) dynamic in monocytes/macrophages, which renders those cells ineffectual in suppressing skin inflammation. Mice lacking Arg1 in macrophages develop increased CHS characterized by elevated ear thickening, monocytes/macrophage-dominated dermal inflammation, and increased iNOS and IL-6 expression compared to control mice. Treatment of Arg1flox/flox; LysMCre+/− mice with a selective NOS inhibitor or knockout of iNOS significantly ameliorated CHS. Our findings suggest a critical role for Arg1 in monocytes/macrophages in suppressing CHS through dampening Nos2 expression. These results may support that increasing Arg1 may be a potential therapeutic avenue in treating allergic contact dermatitis.
Objectives/Hypothesis: To further clinically characterize lingual hamartomas, and to consolidate literature by analyzing clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, treatment, and outcomes.Study Design: Retrospective chart review and literature review. Methods: Case series from 1989 to 2020 at a tertiary pediatric center; follow-up ranging from 2 months to 12 years. Patient demographics, clinical presentations, physical examination findings, surgical pathology, operative methods, preoperative imaging, and follow-up. A review of English-language literature from 1945 to 2020 was conducted.Results: Seven patients (four male, three female) with nine lingual hamartomas were identified. Average age at surgical excision was 7.9 months (SD 3.5 months, range 3 to 14 months). Follow-up ranged from 2 months to 12 years, with all patients having no recurrence. Physical examination identified five pedunculated hamartomas and two sessile hamartomas. One patient had a neck CT, one had neck ultrasound, and two had facial MRIs. CT and ultrasounds confirmed presence of cervical thyroid. MRI suggested no muscular invasion for one patient, whereas motion artifact obscured findings for the other patient. Most patients who presented with dysphagia or poor weight gain achieved post-surgical improvement. The present cases combined with the literature review identified 57 patients with 63 lingual hamartomas.Conclusions: Lingual hamartomas appear as hypovascular pedunculated masses near the foramen cecum. There is no demographic predisposition, and most are identified during infancy. Imaging is not necessary, unless there is concern for lingual thyroid, in which case thyroid ultrasound should be performed. Surgical excision is curative, with dysphagia resolution and low likelihood for recurrence.
Background Otologic symptoms consistent with Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) are common in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), but can also occur independently of CRS as primary ETD. It is unclear if CRS+ETD is similar to primary ETD or how treatment outcomes compare. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (PRISMA). Any study describing ETD in CRS was included. Primary ETD studies were limited to those with preoperative and postoperative Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ‐7) scores in ETD treated only with Eustachian tube balloon dilation (ETBD). Results Sixteen studies were included: nine studies with 1336 consecutive patients with CRS and seven studies with 161 patients with primary ETD. In studies with specific data, 225 (47.2%) patients with CRS had a score >14.5, consistent with ETD. In CRS+ETD, baseline mean ± standard deviation (SD) ETDQ‐7 score was 20.7 ± 8.4 and did not differ by polyp status. In primary ETD, mean ETDQ‐7 score was significantly higher than CRS+ETD (29.5 ± 8.1, p < 0.0001). Regarding treatment outcomes, CRS+ETD treated with endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) alone resulted in mean ETDQ‐7 in the normal range (13.2 ± 5.3), with a mean change of −7.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], −10.82 to −3.99) (p < 0.00001). Patients with primary ETD treated with ETBD had postoperative ETDQ7 scores of 14.9 ± 7.5 with mean change of −13.9 (95% CI, −18.01 to −9.88), p < 0.00001. Conclusion ETD is noted in approximately half of patients with CRS. Outcomes of CRS+ETD treated with ESS alone are similar to those of patients with primary ETD treated with ETBD.
Objectives To compare the efficacy of aural foreign body (FB) extractions among medical care settings and determine if certain methods of extraction resulted in higher failure rates and procedural complications. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting Emergency departments (EDs), urgent cares (UCs), pediatric primary care providers (PCPs), and otolaryngologists (ENTs). Methods A total of 366 pediatric patients with EAC foreign bodies at a tertiary children’s hospital and associated satellite clinics. Results The ED/UCs (17.46%), PCPs (75.22%), and ENTs (94.54%) exhibited highly variable success rates for pediatric aural FB extractions. Complications were considerably higher for attempts by ED/UCs (22.22%) as compared with PCPs (2.61%) and those of unclear etiology (2.73% of all attempts). Use of balloon-tipped catheters and adhesive-tipped probes (eg, cyanoacrylate/superglue) for FB extraction exhibited 0% success rates with high severity of complications. Conclusion Our statistics provide an example in which ED/UCs had higher failure rates at pediatric aural FB removals when compared with PCPs and ENTs. If a single provider (PCP or ED/UC) fails to retrieve an aural FB or if the provider is not comfortable conducting the procedure, then referral to an ENT is preferable to another PCP or ED/UC. Our evidence reveals that balloon-tipped catheters and adhesive-tipped probes for FB removal in the pediatric population are prone to failure and higher rates/severity of complications.
Objective: To examine the effectiveness of Eustachian tube procedures for the treatment of baro-challenge Eustachian tube dysfunction.Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, databases, including PubMed (National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health), Scopus (Elsevier), and CINAHL (EBSCO), were searched for articles examining the effectiveness of Eustachian tube procedures for baro-challenge Eustachian tube dysfunction. Outcome measures included symptom resolution, ability to return to work, equalization problems (EP) scores, Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ-7) scores, and pressure chamber testing parameters. Pooled meta-analysis was performed for dichotomous measures and ETDQ-7 scores.Results: Eleven articles with 81 patients were included. Seventy-two patients from 10 articles underwent balloon Eustachian tube dilation; nine patients in 1 study underwent laser Eustachian tuboplasty (LET). All 81 patients were preoperatively symptomatic with barometric pressure change, and 26/30 (86.7%) were unable to work due to symptoms. On meta-analysis, after balloon dilation Eustachian tuboplasty (BDET), 82.5% (n = 30 [95% confidence interval: 42%-100%]) had improvement in ability to valsalva, 79.1% (n = 16 [57.9%-94.1%]) in ability to return to work, and 84.3% (n = 69 [69.8%-94.7%]) in any symptom. Of 25 patients with individual ETDQ-7 scores, 79.1% [51.4, 96.9] had improvements after BDET. For four case series with 36 patients, ETDQ-7 scores decreased by 1.2 [0.7, 1.7] (p < 0.00001). Of 20 patients with preoperative ETDQ-7 scores >2.0, there was a mean decrease of 2.1 [1.3, 2.8] (p < 0.00001).Conclusion: From the available evidence, Eustachian tube procedures appear to be effective at improving symptoms of baro-challenge Eustachian tube dysfunction. However, higher quality evidence is needed to support making definite recommendations for the use of balloon Eustachian tube dilation or LET for these patients.
No abstract
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.