Two hundred five patients who underwent elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair were divided into two groups: those who underwent infrarenal cross-clamping alone (n = 166) and those who underwent suprarenal cross-clamping alone or combined with infrarenal cross-clamping (n = 39). Mortality was comparable between groups (1.2% for infrarenal cross-clamping vs 2.6% for suprarenal cross-clamping). Transient renal insufficiency was more frequent in the suprarenal group than in the infrarenal group (28% vs 10%), but dialysis rates (3% for suprarenal vs 2% for infrarenal) were similar. Cardiac morbidity was comparable between groups as well. Operating room data reflected the technical challenge of complex aneurysm repairs. The retroperitoneal approach was the preferred exposure in the suprarenal group since better access to the suprarenal aorta may be achieved with this technique. While abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs requiring suprarenal cross-clamping remain a technical challenge, the risks are not formidable and suprarenal cross-clamping should be considered when confronted with difficult periaortic dissection.

Preoperative use of percutaneous balloon angioplasty is ineffective and should be avoided in this setting. Surgical intervention within days of thrombolysis obviates the need for interim oral anticoagulation and enables patients to return to normal activity sooner.

Recognition of patent distal vessels above a CCA occlusion depends on a high index of suspicion, careful investigation of the carotid bulb with duplex scanning, and delayed arteriographic views of the bulb allowing for late collateral vessel filling. The favorable results in this small series of patients supports an aggressive surgical approach when patients with symptoms are encountered with patent distal vessels above an occluded CCA.

No abstract