No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Economic, social and governance (ESG) have become topical subjects amidst the deleterious effects of climate change, inequality and similar pressing challenges facing the people and the planet. The main objective of this study was to rank the importance of both the pillars within the ESG model and the five indicators beneath each pillar for the purposes of executive compensation plans through the Analytical hierarchical process (AHP). It is not known which pillar within the ESG model should be prioritised by companies operating in a developing economy context such as South Africa, and neither is it known which of the available indicators should be prioritised when designing executive compensation plans. AHP and pairwise comparison is employed in prioritising important pillars and indicators. The environmental pillar is identified to be the most important among the three pillars. Indicators that are prioritised mirror both the environmental and socio-economic challenges prevalent in South Africa as an emerging economy. Companies’ boards, remuneration committees, investors and policymakers can use the ESG-based indicators that have been prioritised in this study in designing the executive compensation plans. AHP and pairwise comparison are novel approaches used to prioritise the important pillars within the ESG model and the underlying indicators.

Research purpose: The purpose of this paper was to investigate the association between corporate attributes and the implementation of Integrated Reporting (IR) among quoted companies on the Nigerian Stock Exchange which currently operates a voluntary based disclosure environment.Design and method: Using content analysis to derive the disclosure scores for integrated reporting and corporate attributes, the authors investigated the impact of corporate attributes on the implementation of the integrated reporting of a sample of 90 listed firms. The annual reports covering 2013–2017 were analysed using the disclosure methodologies developed by prior researchers in IR. The hypotheses were tested using panel least square regressions.Main findings: The authors found that corporate attributes have a statistically positive and significant impact on the implementation of integrated reporting framework, that share ownership structure and firm age have an insignificant influence over corporate implementation of the integrated reporting framework. The research findings extend integrated reporting research in Nigeria from mere primary data analysis to quantitative data analysis.Practical implications: The empirical findings provide regulators with evidence on the current level of integrated reporting disclosures and the influence of corporate attributes in driving integrated reporting.Originality and value: The study makes significant contributions to integrated reporting literature from a developing country’s perspective. It also provided empirical evidence of a high level of disclosure compliance with the IR framework among quoted companies in Nigeria.