A mail survey of 2003-07 dental school graduates was undertaken by the Department of Anesthesiology at the University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the predoctoral curriculum in anesthesia and to determine the preparedness of practicing dentists to provide anesthesia services for their dental patients. Subsets of the survey responses were created to specifically evaluate the effectiveness of an advanced selective program in sedation offered to approximately twenty third-and fourth-year predoctoral students. This fourteen-month Anesthesia Selective Program provides advanced didactic instruction and clinical experiences needed to establish competence in minimal to moderate sedation. Overall, graduates reported being best prepared in assessment of medical histories, physiology, and pharmacology, while being least prepared in oral sedation, intravenous sedation, and general anesthesia. For graduates currently in general practice, those who had participated in the Anesthesia Selective Program reported being better prepared in most subjects relating to anesthesia and patient care. Participants in the selective were also more likely to treat special needs patients in their private practices. Respondents' written comments indicated a desire for a greater number of clinical experiences involving sedation procedures within the predoctoral curriculum. This outcome assessment indicated that a greater emphasis should be placed on instruction and training experiences for enteral sedation within the predoctoral dental curriculum. Advanced training and increased clinical experiences in anesthesia may also be an effective means to better prepare graduates to assess medical histories, to manage medical emergencies, and to be willing to treat medically complex patients as well as patients with special health care needs.
A 6-year-old female in good health presented with no known drug allergies for dental treatment under general anesthesia. Following the preoperative evaluation, the patient received intramuscular premedication consisting of midazolam (1 mg) and Ketamine (60 mg) into the left deltoid muscle. During patient transfer, anesthesia personnel detected a hive developing in proximity to the patient's right ear lobe. The subject was directly placed into the operative chair, and a physical exam revealed urticaria on the neck, back, and torso. In addition, an audible wheeze was detected with lung auscultation. Investigations carried out after the incident revealed a positive reaction to ketamine
Automated External Defibrillators (AED) are becoming more prominent in public locations within the mainstream of our society. They are marketed as providing the ability for a broader range of people, beyond clinicians and community emergency medical services personal, to successfully defibrillate a person in cardiac arrest. The objectives of this study were to determine whether or not a member of the general population, without previous exposure to an AED, could successfully operate an AED, thus delivering the necessary shock in ventricular fibrillation arrest. In addition, we analyzed the relationship between health care training and the time required to defibrillate a patient using an AED and investigated the overall success of operating an AED with respect to health care training. Utilizing an AED trainer, we conducted a timed trial study of five subject categories (general population; first-year dental students; third-year dental students; dentists, hygienists, and nurses; and anesthesiologists and surgeons) as each operator attempted to defibrillate a mannequin (n=50). Their times, success in defibrillation, and comments were recorded. The general population group experienced an 80 percent failure rate, while the other groups showed an inverse relationship between failure rates and the amount of health care training. Overall, only 58 percent of the subjects successfully performed the defibrillation with the AED. Operator speed in relation to the amount of health care training showed another inverse relationship as times decreased from group one (general population) to group five (anesthesiologists and surgeons). The findings suggest that prior exposure to an AED leads to a greater number of successful defibrillations. It remains unclear at this time as to whether a member of the general population can successfully operate an AED.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.