Successful retinal reattachment and achievement of minimum functional vision is possible after PPV and retinotomy with evacuation of a massive subretinal hemorrhage for bullous HRD secondary to age-related macular degeneration.
ABSTRACT.Purpose: To ascertain the difference of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement between vitrectomized air-filled and fluid-filled eyes. Methods: Thirty-one eyes of 31 consecutive patients who underwent conventional vitrectomy and intraocular gas tamponade were assessed. After vitrectomy, IOP of the fluid-filled eyes was measured by Tono-Pen. Thereafter, fluid-air exchange was performed, and IOP of the air-filled eyes was measured again. The IOP within each fluid-and air-filled eye was varied by selecting settings on the vitrectomy system, from 10 to 50 mmHg with 5-mmHg increments. Postoperatively, IOP was assessed by both Tono-Pen and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). Linear and nonlinear regression analyses were conducted between intraoperatively measured Tono-Pen readings and actual IOPs. Bland-Altman plot was used to assess the agreements between postoperatively measured Tono-Pen readings and GAT readings. Results: The discrepancy between Tono-Pen readings and actual IOP in fluidfilled eyes was not significant, except for the profound high pressures over 45 mmHg. However, Tono-Pen readings in air-filled eyes were significantly lower than actual IOPs in all ranges, and Tono-Pen increasingly underestimates IOP at higher levels. Intraoperative Tono-Pen readings were correlated significantly with actual IOP and a quadratic equation evidenced the best fit (R 2 = 0.996). Postoperatively, difference of the measurements between TonoPen and GAT was not significant. Conclusion: Tono-Pen and GAT significantly underestimate actual IOP in airfilled eyes. It should be considered that actual IOP would be greater than the measured IOP in gas-filled eyes, even though the IOP is measured as normal.
Purpose:To assess the influence of body position on intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients who underwent vitrectomy and intraocular gas tamponade. Methods: Patients who did not undergo any surgery were defined as Group 1. The remaining patients were divided into 3 groups according to the surgery performed (Group 2; cataract surgery, Group 3; vitrectomy and cataract surgery, Group 4; vitrectomy with intraocular gas tamponade and cataract surgery). IOP was measured by a non-contact tonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen in the sitting, supine, and prone positions. Results: The difference of IOP measured in the sitting position among the 4 groups was not significant. IOP was significantly elevated by 2.04 mm Hg on average when the posture was changed from sitting to supine or prone in all 4 groups. The IOP discrepancy between supine and sitting positions was significantly greater in group 4 by 3.61 mm Hg than the other groups (p = 0.003, ANOVA test). The IOP difference between the prone and sitting position was also significantly higher in group 4 by 3.82 mm Hg than the other groups (p = 0.001, ANOVA test).
Conclusions:The patients with vitrectomized gas tamponade eyes had a mean IOP increase of 3.82 mm Hg when the position was changed from sitting to prone. When performing vitrectomy and intraocular gas tamponade on patients in the prone position, an IOP elevation should be monitored thoroughly. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2013;54(1):92-96
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.