People with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are commonly prescribed offloading walkers, but inadequate adherence to prescribed use can be a barrier to ulcer healing. This study examined user perspectives of offloading walkers to provide insight on ways to help promote adherence. Participants were randomized to wear: (1) irremovable, (2) removable, or (3) smart removable walkers (smart boot) that provided feedback on adherence and daily walking. Participants completed a 15-item questionnaire based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Spearman correlations assessed associations between TAM ratings with participant characteristics. Chi-squared tests compared TAM ratings between ethnicities, as well as 12-month retrospective fall status. A total of 21 adults with DFU (age 61.5 ± 11.8 years) participated. Smart boot users reported that learning how to use the boot was easy (ρ =−0.82, p≤ 0.001). Regardless of group, people who identified as Hispanic or Latino, compared to those who did not, reported they liked using the smart boot (p = 0.05) and would use it in the future (p = 0.04). Non-fallers, compared to fallers, reported the design of the smart boot made them want to wear it longer (p = 0.04) and it was easy to take on and off (p = 0.04). Our findings can help inform considerations for patient education and design of offloading walkers for DFUs.

Introduction: Individuals who use unilateral transtibial or transfemoral prostheses have negative secondary health effects associated with decreased kinematic (e.g., spatiotemporal and joint angle) walking symmetry between prosthetic and intact limbs. Research studies have quantified kinematic walking symmetry, but studies can be difficult to compare owing to the inclusion of small sample sizes and differences in participant demographics, biomechanical parameters, and mathematical analysis of symmetry. This review aims to normalize kinematic walking symmetry research data across studies by level of limb loss and prosthetic factors to inform considerations in clinical practice and future research. Methods: A search was performed on March 18, 2020, in PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar to encompass kinematic walking symmetry literature from the year 2000. First, the most common participant demographics, kinematic parameters, and mathematical analysis of symmetry were identified across studies. Then, the most common mathematical analysis of symmetry was used to recalculate symmetry data across studies for the five most common kinematic parameters. Results: Forty-four studies were included in this review. The most common participant demographics were younger adults with traumatic etiology who used componentry intended for higher activity levels. The most common kinematic parameters were step length, stance time, and sagittal plane ankle, knee, and hip range of motion. The most common mathematical analysis was a particular symmetry index equation. Conclusions: Normalization of data showed that symmetry tended to decrease as level of limb loss became more proximal and to increase with prosthetic componentry intended for higher activity levels. However, most studies included 10 or fewer individuals who were active younger adults with traumatic etiologies. Clinical Relevance: Data summarized in this review could be used as reference values for rehabilitation and payer justification. Specifically, these data can help guide expectations for magnitudes of walking symmetry throughout rehabilitation or to justify advanced prosthetic componentry for active younger adults under 65 years of age with traumatic etiologies to payers.