Background New Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) such as Rivaroxaban are introduced as alternatives to conventional vitamin-K antagonists in the long-term treatment of thrombotic events due to their lower bleeding risk. There is a lack of evidence on the effectiveness and safety of Rivaroxaban in Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). This study aims to assess the effectiveness and bleeding risk of Rivaroxaban in comparison with Warfarin for the treatment of CVT. Materials and methods 36 patients with diagnosis of CVT were included. Clinical and background information was assessed on admission and patients were followed for at least 12 months. Measured outcomes were modified Rankin Scale (mRS), evidence of recanalization on contrast-enhanced Brain MR venography (MRV) and major or minor bleeding. Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of oral anticoagulant (Rivaroxaban vs Warfarin). Groups were compared in terms of final outcomes and side effects. Result Overall, 13 (36.11%) patients received Warfarin and 23 (63.89%) received Rivaroxaban. Optimal mRS score (0–1) was attained in 9 of 10 (90%) of patients treated with Rivaroxaban and 19 of 22 (86.36%) of patients received Warfarin. MRV showed complete or partial recanalization in 12 of 14 (85.71%) patients treated with Rivaroxaban and all patients in the Warfarin group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of major and minor hemorrhage. Conclusion Rivaroxaban holds promise for the treatment of CVT.
Highlights We described GBS symptoms in three infected patients with COVID-19. The severity and fast progression of GBS linked to COVID-19 seems considerable in mentioned cases. Acute motor and sensory axonal neuropathy (AMSAN) type of GBS was diagnosed according to electrodiagnostic findings in all three cases. GBS is suggested to be considered as a severe and rapid progressive profile in neurologic complications of COVID-19.
Since the beginning of worldwide vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), studies have reported a possible association between vaccination and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). In this regard, we conducted a systematic review assessing different demographic, clinical, and neurophysiological aspects of patients with GBS following immunization with COVID-19 vaccines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar was performed. Articles in English between January 2020 and November 2021 were included. Data on demographics, clinical characteristics, vaccines information, treatment approaches, and outcomes were extracted. The data of a total of 88 patients out of 41 studies was included. The mean age of patients was 58.7 ± 16.6 years and 55 cases (62.5%) were male. AstraZeneca was the most-reported vaccine associated with GBS with 52 cases (59.1%) followed by Pfizer with 20 cases (22.7%). GBS occurred after the first dose of vaccination in 70 cases (79.5%). The mean time interval between vaccination and symptom onset was 13.9 ± 7.4 days. Limb weakness (47.7%), sensory disturbance (38.6%), and facial weakness (27.3%) were the most common reported symptoms, respectively. Albuminocytologic dissociation was seen in 65% of patients who underwent lumbar puncture ( n = 65). Acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculopathy was the most common GBS subtype, which was reported in 38 patients (43.2%). While one-fifth of patients underwent intubation ( n = 17), a favorable outcome was achieved in the majority of subjects ( n = 46, 63%). Overall, a small rise in GBS incidence, following various COVID-19 vaccines, was observed. Notably, 85% of affected individuals experienced at least a partial recovery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.