The ability to measure the level of friction between the human skin and a given textile is critical across fashion and textiles sectors, not least for the development of sporting and protective clothing. A portable custom-made device capable of measuring friction during the skin-textile interaction across often difficult or impossible to investigate body regions with objective repeatability has been established. The friction between a pre-shrunk 100% cotton textile and a quantity of four control surfaces (transparent and patterned polycarbonate plastic, and silicon and lorica surrogate skin) was measured three times per day across five consecutive days. The results clearly demonstrated that the novel friction test device had an excellent repeatability of 0.94 and 0.93 intraclass corelation coefficient for static and dynamic friction coefficient measurement, respectively. The silicon surrogate skin control surface produced the highest friction coefficient, while the pattered polycarbonate plate demonstrated the lowest friction coefficient, suggesting that the physical features of the control surface material influenced the recorded coefficient of friction. It was also revealed that the relationship between the static and dynamic friction coefficient is dependent on the surface material.
Measuring the friction between human skin and textiles is essential to preventing skin-related health problems and wearer discomfort. This study sought to evaluate the repeatability of friction coefficient measurements and tactile perceptions at various human body regions, using a recently developed portable friction measuring device. Using the device, a cotton textile was applied to six test locations. The friction coefficient and tactile perceptions were taken three times, at each test site. The repeatability of friction coefficient was excellent with ICC of 0.91 ± 0.05 for static and 0.91 ± 0.06 for dynamic friction coefficient, and tactile perception showed good to excellent repeatability. The friction coefficient and tactile perception significantly differed across the body regions (p = 0.008 and p = 0.003, respectively). The chest showed the highest static friction coefficient with 0.90 ± 0.19 and dynamic friction coefficient with 0.79 ± 0.20, whereas the dorsal forearm with static 0.31 ± 0.07 and dynamic 0.25 ± 0.05 was the lowest. The ratings of tactile perceptions were independent of friction coefficient when the changes in the coefficient of friction were induced by regional difference, and/or the range of the coefficient of friction values were small. Moreover, skin temperature and friction coefficient correlated positively, whilst cutaneous hydration and friction coefficient did not.
Purpose To assess five theoretical foundations underlying thermosensory testing using local thermal stimuli. Methods Thermal sensation, discomfort and the confidence of thermal sensation scores were measured in 9 female and 8 male volunteers in response to 17 physical contact temperature stimuli, ranging between 18–42 °C. These were applied to their dorsal forearm and lateral torso, across two sessions. Results Thermal sensation to physical temperature relationships followed a positive linear and sigmoidal fit at both forearm (r2 = 0.91/r2 = 0.91, respectively) and lateral torso (r2 = 0.90/ r2 = 0.91, respectively). Thermal discomfort to physical temperature relationships followed second and third-order fits at both forearm (r2 = 0.33/r2 = 0.34, respectively) and lateral torso (r2 = 0.38/r2 = 0.39, respectively) test sites. There were no sex-related or regional site differences in thermal sensation and discomfort across a wide range of physical contact temperatures. The median confidence of an individual’s thermal sensation rating was measured at 86%. Conclusion The relation between thermal sensation and physical contact temperature was well described by both linear and sigmoidal models, i.e., the distance between the thermal sensation anchors is close to equal in terms of physical temperatures changes for the range studied. Participants rated similar thermal discomfort level in both cold and hot thermal stimuli for a given increase or decrease in physical contact temperature or thermal sensation. The confidence of thermal sensation rating did not depend on physical contact temperature.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.