BACKGROUND: The Alpha variant of SARS-CoV-2 has a higher transmission rate than the first variant identified. The efficacy of vaccines is affected by the characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 variants. OBJECTIVE: Investigate the relationship of vaccination and virus variant on the course of the disease in patients who were hospitalized with a diagnosis of COVID-19. DESIGN: Retrospective, cohort study SETTING: Tertiary health institution PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included patients older than the age of 18 years who were hospitalized in a COVID-19 service or the intensive care unit with a diagnosis of COVID-19 between 1 January 2021 and 30 April 2021. Demographic characteristics, vaccination and the Alpha virus variant status, comorbidities, and information about hospitalization were obtained from the hospital automation system and patient files. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Vaccination rate and relationship with course of disease. SAMPLE SIZE: 608 RESULTS: Most of the patients (n=482, 79.3%) were admitted to the COVID-19 service. More of the COVID-19 service patients had the Alpha variant than the patients admitted to ICU ( P <.009). The Alpha variant was also more common in younger patients ( P <.001). There was no relationship between the Alpha virus and comorbid diseases such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Mortality was lower in the patients who had received a second dose of the Sinovac vaccine ( P =.004) compared with unvaccinated patients. CONCLUSION: Although the Alpha variant spreads faster, it has a milder course. If only the Sinovac vaccine is available, we recommend that the two doses of the Sinovac vaccine be administered. LIMITATIONS: Our study is single-center and did not include pregnant and pediatric patients. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.
Background/Aim: A recently introduced drug, sugammadex, can be a good alternative to conventional neuromuscular blockade reversal agents, such as neostigmine. This choice is of great importance, especially in the patients in whom it would be wise to avoid cholinergic side effects. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of sugammadex and the combination of neostigmine/atropine on post-operative cognitive dysfunction in bariatric surgery patients. Methods: This randomized controlled trial included a total of 90 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I–III physical status and body mass index >30 who were scheduled for elective sleeve gastrectomy were recruited for the study after obtaining ethics committee approval. Written consent was obtained from each patient. The exclusion criteria consisted of several parameters: lack of consent, co-existing muscular diseases, and severe cardiovascular diseases (New York Heart Association [NYHA]). The patients were randomly divided into two groups, and the randomization was performed by the investigator using previously prepared envelopes. In both groups, Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) was performed before the operation. The patients’ memory, attentive executive functions, and motor skills were evaluated as part of a control cognitive evaluation. After the operation while in the post-anesthesia care unit and when the Modified Aldrete Recovery Score was ≥9, the MMSE evaluation was repeated one and six hours later. Results: The pre-operative MMSE results were similar in both groups. In the post-operative period, MMSEpo, MMSEpo1, and MMSEpo6 values were not significantly different between the groups. When a detailed examination of MMSEpo data was performed, it was determined that the MMSE scores were 20–25 in 14 patients (32.6%) in Group N/A and six patients (14.6%) in Group S. In Group N/A, the percentage of patients with MMSE 20–25 was significantly higher than that of Group S (X2=3.807; P=0.046). Conclusion: In this study, sugammadex produced less effects on cognitive functions when compared with neostigmine/atropine combination. The neostigmine/atropine combination produced mild effects on cognitive functions in the first hour of recovery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.