Hypoglycemia is a common side effect of insulin therapy, the constant threat of hypoglycemia symptoms and consequences may lead people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) to develop fear of hypoglycemia (FOH). This analysis aims to explore the characteristics of people who consider FOH as a barrier to managing diabetes. Methods: Self-reported data from an online T1D registry were analyzed to compare participants who consider FOH a barrier to those who do not (a registry-specific yes/no question) using χ2 test for categorical variables (gender, diabetes technology use, and hypoglycemia history) and the Mann-Whitney Test for age, T1D duration, Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (HFS-II), Hypoglycemia Confidence Survey (HCS), and Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS) scores. Results: Among 780 adults, 65% women, aged 44±15 years, had T1D for 25±15 years, 35% reported HbA1c≤ 7%, and 45% perceived FOH as a barrier. The prevalence of FOH as a barrier was higher in women, participants with history of symptomatic nocturnal or level 3 hypoglycemia, higher HbA1c, higher HFS and DDS scores, and lower HCS scores (Table 1). Conclusion: A significant proportion of adults, in particular women and those with a challenging T1D management (high HbA1c, history of hypoglycemia, diabetes distress, and low hypoglycemia confidence), consider FOH to be a barrier in T1D management, thus it needs to be considered as part of clinical follow-up. Disclosure M.K.Talbo: None. C.Leroux: None. L.Hill: None. A.Brazeau: Other Relationship; Dexcom, Inc., Diabète québec, Ordre des diététistes nutritionnistes du Québec, Research Support; Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Fonds de recherche du Québec en Santé.
Introduction: Support-Pro is a comprehensive online platform that was developed for healthcare professionals (HCP) and covers all technological, treatment and lifestyle needs for type 1 diabetes (T1D) management in short, practical modules. It was developed as studies have demonstrated that HCPs who work in healthcare not specific to T1D, find it difficult to keep up-to-date with new developments that could improve T1D care and management. However, specialized online resources, such as Support-Pro, could help rectify this problem. The objective of the study is to assess whether Support-Pro can increase HCPs confidence in treating and supporting people with T1D (PWT1D) and their satisfaction with the platform. Methods: Open-label, non-randomized, 3-month trial with 142 HCPs who had access to Support-Pro, and 66 who completed 3 months on the platform (NCT04859205). Results: On average, the 66 participants (years of practice: 14±10; 90% women; 71% Caucasian; 44% dietitians, 30% nurses, 23% pharmacists, 3% physician or resident physician) reported at 3 months, an average 10% improvement in their confidence (total score 58% to 68%; p<0.0001) and a median satisfaction score of 76%. HCPs most valued features that supported knowledge gain, such as downloadable PDF documents (72%) and case studies (44%). The platform was most used in first month of access (page views 1st month: 50 [5;135] vs. 3rd month: 0 [0;18]). Conclusions: HCPs who completed 3 months on Support-Pro platform reported increased confidence in treating PWT1D and high appreciation of learning content and modalities. This platform could improve the support and advice provided to PWT1D followed-up outside specialized clinics. Disclosure A.Katz: None. R.Rabasa-lhoret: Consultant; Dexcom, Inc., Abbott, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novo Nordisk Canada Inc., Sanofi, Lilly, Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc., Insulet Corporation. M.K.Talbo: None. A.Housni: None. L.Hill: None. A.Roy-fleming: None. S.Haag: Other Relationship; Omnipod. A.Brazeau: Other Relationship; Dexcom, Inc., Diabète québec, Ordre des diététistes nutritionnistes du Québec, Research Support; Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Fonds de recherche du Québec en Santé. Funding Strategy Patient-Oriented Research (JT1-157204); JDRF (4-SRA-2018-651-Q-R)
Background: Real-time continuous glucose monitors (rtCGM) are associated with improved type 1 diabetes (T1D) management and quality of life but little is known on their impact on fear of hypoglycemia (FOH) . This review and meta-analysis assessed the impact of rtCGM on FOH in T1D. Methods: Studies assessing FOH in non-pregnant adults with T1D using rtCGM compared to capillary blood glucose (CBG) or intermittently scanned CGM (isCGM) were included. Results from RCTs were pooled using a random-effects model to calculate the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% CI. Results: We identified 14 original studies, with 2590 participants and lasting 8 to 26 weeks for RCTs and 16 to 52 weeks for observational studies. Ten RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. A clear trend was observed that rtCGM was associated with lower FOH (mean difference (MD) = -3.44, 95%CI [-4.02, -2.85]) with the effect size showing a significant moderate association between rtCGM and FOH reduction compared to controls (SMD= -0.52, 95%CI [-1.02, -0.02], I2= 92%) (Figure) . Observational studies (n= 4) showed a significant association between rtCGM use and lower FOH (MD = -4.10, 95%CI [-4.84, -3.36]) . Conclusions: Compared to both isCGM and CBG; rtCGM use shows a moderate trend for lower FOH in medium-term RCTs, which was further supported by results from longer observational studies. Disclosure M.K.Talbo: None. A.Katz: None. T.Peters: None. J.Yale: Advisory Panel; Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Canada Inc., Sanofi, Research Support; Bayer AG, Speaker's Bureau; Abbott Diabetes, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk Canada Inc., Sanofi. Z.Wu: Other Relationship; Eli Lilly and Company. A.Brazeau: Research Support; Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi.
Introduction: Hypoglycemia is a common side effect of type 1 diabetes (T1D) therapy with consequences ranging from physical and cognitive impairment to reduced quality of life. Studies evaluating consequences of level 2 (L2H, glucose level<3.0mmol/L without needing assistance from another person to recover) and level 3 (L3H, needing assistance from another person) hypoglycemia between the genders are sparse. Aim: To highlight the differences in reported consequences related to both L2H and L3H between genders. Methods: Self-reported data from an online Canadian registry of adults with T1D were analyzed using logistic regression models adjusted for age, diabetes technology use, hypoglycemia history in the past month, Hypoglycemia Fear Survey II (HFS II) , and Hypoglycemia Confidence Scale (HCS) scores. Results: Among 877 adults (65% women, mean age 43 ± 15 years, mean duration of T1D 25 ± 15 years, 34% reported a HbA1c ≤ 7.0%, 81% used continuous glucose monitoring, and 43% used an insulin pump) , 15% experienced L3H in the past year and 81% experienced L2H in the past month. Women reported more L2H (84% vs. 75%, p=0.004) and worse HFS-II and HCS scores than men (median 33 [IQR 23, 47] vs. 28 [18, 38], p=0.002 and 3.2 [2.9, 3.6] vs. 3.4 [3.0, 3.8], p<0.001, respectively) . The adjusted regression models showed that women were more likely than men to report experiencing persistent fatigue after L2H (OR 1.76, 95%CI [1.19, 2.61]) and increased anxiety, persistent fatigue, or an additional encounter with a healthcare professional after a L3H episode (1.71 [1.04, 2.82]; 1.75 [1.02, 3.00]; 2.59 [1.17, 5.74], respectively) . Conclusion: Women report significantly more L2H and L3H consequences compared to men, in addition to reporting higher fear and lower confidence. Social constructs on stress management may explain the observed gender differences, and suggest taking a gender-based differential approach when addressing hypoglycemia. Disclosure M. K. Talbo: None. M. Lebbar: None. V. Messier: None. Z. Wu: Other Relationship; Eli Lilly and Company. A. Brazeau: Research Support; Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi. R. Rabasa-lhoret: Consultant; HLS Therapeutics Inc., Pfizer Inc., Other Relationship; Abbott Diabetes, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Insulet Corporation, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Medtronic, Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk Canada Inc., Sanofi, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Research Support; Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Cystic Fibrosis Canada, Diabetes Canada, Fondation Francophone pour la Recherche en Diabète (FFRD) , JDRF, National Institutes of Health, Société Francophone du Diabète (SFD) , Speaker’s Bureau; Canadian Medical & Surgical Knowledge Translation Research Group (CMS) , CPD Network, Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. Funding Canadian Institutes of Health Research (JT1-157204) and Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (4-SRA-2018-651-Q-R)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.