The present study aims to settle a long-standing historiographical disagreement: where historians of the Habsburg dynasty have traditionally seen Emperor Ferdinand I as a Catholic moderate, those of the Tyrol have traditionally viewed him as a Catholic zealot. On the basis of original archival research, it argues in favour of the former interpretation. Though Ferdinand officially condemned Lutheranism, he tacitly tolerated the religion, whether in the Tyrol or elsewhere in Central Europe. To his way of thinking, religious co-existence was not an end in itself, but rather a temporary expedient pending the reunion of Catholicism, Utraquism and Lutheranism under the umbrella of a reformed universal Church. This interpretation follows from a perception of the Empire as a still vital political organism; thus, more than any one territory, the Reformation was a struggle over the religion of the Empire. This paper is divided into three parts. The first looks at the Tyrolean Reformation as a historical problem. The second offers a close case study of Ferdinand's Religionspolitik in the Tyrol. The third centres on Ferdinand's Religionspolitik in Germany and Bohemia.
The reconstruction of social and political elitesis one of the most demanding tasks a historian will face. It requires the collection of a mass of data—such as dates of birth and death, place of origin, parentage, marriage and issue, wealth, career, social networks, intellectual life—and its analysis. Even then the findings are predetermined because they follow from the criteria applied; rather than absolute certainty, these findings commonly yield no more than probabilities. Only rarely will the sources obviate these difficulties by identifying the actors for us, as if ready-made. Happily those of the Tirol from 1567 do precisely that.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.