No abstract

Background: Sildenafil is a selective inhibitor of cyclic GMP-specific phosphodiesterase type 5 that has been associated with greater improvement of erectile function compared to placebo among men with erectile dysfunction. The goal of our study was to evaluate its efficacy in a small sample of outpatients with antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction. Methods: We studied the first 14 depressed outpatients (9 men and 5 women; mean age: 46.4 ± 8.4) who were consecutively treated with oral sildenafil. Twelve of the 14 patients were treated with an SSRI and 2 with mirtazapine. All patients were prescribed oral sildenafil tablets at the initial dose of 50 mg q.d. p.r.n., with the possibility of increasing the dose to 100 mg q.d. p.r.n., if clinically indicated. We administered a sexual functioning questionnaire derived from the Guided Interview Questionnaire for females and males and from the Arizona Sexual Experience Scale to all patients before and after at least 4 weeks of treatment with oral sildenafil. The mean sildenafil dose in our 14 patients was 57 ± 18 mg/day. Results: All 14 subjects completed the follow-up assessments and no subjects discontinued the drug prematurely. We observed statistically significant improvements in all domains of sexual functioning, including libido, arousal, orgasm, sexual satisfaction, and (in males only) erectile function, with a 69% rate of patients reporting themselves as much or very much improved. Oral sildenafil treatment appeared to be very well tolerated, with only 1 out of 14 (7%) patients reporting an adverse event (hot flashes). Conclusions: Our findings of statistically significant improvements in all domains of sexual functioning in a sample of 14 men and women with antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction suggest that this agent may represent an efficacious approach to this population.

No abstract

Rationale: Recently, a number of studies have challenged the finding that acute tryptophan depletion (TD) increases depressive symptoms in medicated, formerly depressed patients. The present study examined the effects of acute nutritional TD on remitted depressed patients currently treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. In an attempt to clarify conflicting earlier findings, the effects of a number of clinical variables on outcome were also investigated. Methods: Ten patients underwent TD in a double-blind, controlled, balanced crossover fashion. The control session followed the procedure of Krahn et al. (1996 Neuropsychopharmacology 15:325-328). Sessions were 5-8 days apart. Results: TD was significantly related to increased scores on clinicianrated depression and anxiety scales, and on self-rated depression, anxiety, and somatic symptoms. The control challenge had no effect, despite the fact that the reductions in plasma tryptophan during the control session were unexpectedly high. Some evidence was found for a threshold in the relationship between reduction of plasma tryptophan and mood response. Conclusions: The mood effect of TD in medicated, formerly depressed patients was confirmed. A threshold may exist for mood effects following TD, implying that recent negative findings may have been caused by insufficient depletion. No other predicting or mediating factors were identified, although the variable "history of response pattern to medication" deserves further study.

Pramipexole, used as an adjunct to antidepressants or mood stabilizers, appeared to be effective and safe in the treatment of unipolar and bipolar depression. These uncontrolled, retrospective, naturalistic pilot data require confirmation by controlled research before conclusions can be made.