Background: Neuromodulators are considered potential therapeutic options for refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux-induced chronic cough. Aim: To compare the efficacy of gabapentin and baclofen in patients with suspected refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux-induced chronic cough. Methods: Two hundred and thirty-four patients with suspected refractory gastrooesophageal reflux-induced chronic cough, who failed an 8-week course of omeprazole and domperidone, were recruited into the open-labelled study and randomly assigned to receive either gabapentin (maximum daily dose of 900 mg) or baclofen (maximum daily dose of 60 mg) for 8 weeks as add-on therapy to the previous treatment. The primary end point was the successful rate of cough resolution; and the secondary end-points included cough sensitivity to capsaicin and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease questionnaire score and reported side effects. Results:One hundred and eleven patients in the gabapentin group and 106 in the baclofen group completed the study. The overall success rate for cough resolution was comparable (57.3% vs 53.0%, χ 2 = 0.357, P = 0.550) between the two groups.In parallel, cough sensitivity to capsaicin and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease questionnaire score decreased after treatment with either gabapentin or baclofen.However, gabapentin was associated with less frequent somnolence (20.5% vs 35.0%, χ 2 = 6.156, P = 0.013) and dizziness (11.1% vs 23.9%, χ 2 = 6.654, P = 0.010) than baclofen. Conclusions:Gabapentin and baclofen have similar therapeutic efficacy for suspected refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux-induced chronic cough. However, gabapentin may be preferable because of fewer side effects. Trial Register: http:// www.chictr.org/; No.: ChiCTR-ONC-13003066.Ran Dong and Xianghuai Xu contributed equally to this work.

No abstract

Objectives: To elucidate the accuracy and advantages of Multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH) in diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux-induced chronic cough (GERC). Methods: The patients with suspected GERC were recruited and underwent MII-pH, GERC was confirmed by subsequent anti-reflux treatment despite the findings of MII-pH. Its diagnostic accuracy in identifying GERC were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and compared with that of 24-h esophageal pH monitoring. Results: Among 158 patients completing both MII-pH and anti-reflux therapy, GERC was diagnosed in 136 patients, including acid GERC in 96 patients (70.6%), non-acid GERC in 30 patients (22.0%), neither one of both GERC in 10 patients (7.4%). For the identification of GERC, MII-pH presented with the sensitivity of 92.6%, specificity of 63.6%, positive predictive value of 94.0%, negative predictive value of 58.3% and area under ROC curve of 0.863, which was totally superior to 24-h esophageal pH monitoring. As the essential criteria of MII-pH, esophageal acid exposure time and symptom associated probability had a limited diagnostic value when used alone, but improved greatly the diagnostic yield when used in combination, even with a suboptimal efficacy. Conclusion: MII-pH is a more sensitive test for identifying GERC, but with a suboptimal diagnostic efficacy.