ObjectiveThe diagnostic value of circulating circular RNAs (circRNAs) has received more and more attention. However, little has been reported about their potential in the diagnosis of congenital heart diseases (CHD). In this study, we explored differential expression of circRNAs from children with CHD to evaluate their potential as clinical biomarkers.MethodsWe established a discovery cohort (four CHD cases; four matched healthy controls) and a validation cohort (40 CHD cases; 40 matched healthy controls). Microarray expression analysis was performed on the discovery set to identify candidate circRNAs. Candidates were further validated in the validation set. The diagnostic accuracy of circRNAs was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Gene ontology (GO), pathway, and network analysis were performed to predict a network of circRNA/miRNA and target mRNAs related to CHD.ResultsThe top seven significantly differentially expressed CHD‐associated circRNAs were validated by RT‐PCR as follows: hsa_circRNA_004183, hsa_circRNA_079265, hsa_circRNA_105039, hsa_circRNA_404686, hsa_circRNA_101050, hsa_circRNA_100787, and hsa_circRNA_101328. Three significantly down‐regulated circRNAs (hsa_circRNA_004183, hsa_circRNA_079265, and hsa_circRNA_105039) were identified with area under curve (AUC) values of 0.758, 0.809, and 0.907, respectively; the combination had an AUC of 0.965. An interaction network was constructed by 43 circRNAs, 9 miRNAs, and 29 mRNAs, which involved in heart development.ConclusionsWe identified three circRNAs under‐expressed in plasma from children with CHD. These circRNAs may be crucial in the development of CHD and may serve as novel non‐invasive biomarkers for the diagnosis of CHD in children.
Background
ACE2 plays a particular role in the changes in multiple organ functions. However, whether ACE2 expression differs at different ages and whether it plays a role in infection-related organ dysfunction remains unclear.
Methods
Female and male C57BL/6 mice in four different age groups were included in this study. Immunohistochemical and Western blot analyses were performed to evaluate ACE2 expression characteristics in lung tissues. At the same time, we detected the changes of ACE2 in human blood of different ages and evaluated its clinical significance in sepsis-associated organ dysfunction (SAOD).
Results
This study indicated that ACE2 is expressed differently in mouse lung tissues at four different ages (P < 0.05). The peak expression distribution of ACE2 in lung tissues was in the newborn and middle-aged cohorts (P < 0.05). Infants younger than one year had a significantly higher concentration of ACE2 in serum and enhanced susceptibility compared with other ages (P < 0.05). Serum APTT, D-dimer, LDH, and PCT, as well as ACE2 in sepsis and SAOD groups, were statistically significant (P < 0.05) and were related to an increased risk of SAOD. There was a positive correlation between ACE2 and D-dimer (P < 0.05).
Conclusion
The levels of ACE2 expression varied in different age groups. It tends to be higher in infants and young children. This result suggests that young children are more susceptible to infection. Moreover, a cutoff value for the ACE2 level >1551.15 pg/mL and D-dimer >984.5 U/L should be considered a warning sign of infection-associated organ dysfunction and guide the clinician in evaluating the patient’s multiple organ function.
Strong immunity against COVID-19 in the early two years of age links to frequent immunization of routine vaccines Science Bulletin 65, 2057 (2020); Follow-up testing of viral nucleic acid in discharged patients with moderate type of COVID-19
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.