No abstract

We examined the benefits of the combination of anti-EGFR targeted treatment, cetuximab (CTX) or nimotuzumab (NTZ) and concurrent platinum-based chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) compared with CCRT alone in patients with stage II - IVb nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). A total of 1,628 eligible patients with stage II - IVb NPC, who received CCRT (three cycles of 100 mg/m2 cisplatin every 3 weeks with intensity-modulated radiotherapy) with or without CTX or NTZ between June 2009 and December 2013 were included in the analysis. Using propensity scores to adjust for potential prognostic factors, a well-balanced cohort of 878 patients was created by matching each patient who received CTX or NTZ plus CCRT with no more than four patients who received CCRT alone (1:4). Efficacy and safety were compared between CTX/NTZ plus CCRT and CCRT alone arms. Compared with CCRT alone, treatment with CTX/NTZ plus CCRT was associated with a significantly increased overall survival (3-year OS, 96.6% vs. 92.9%, P = 0.015), improved disease-free survival (3-year DFS, 93.5% vs 86.9%, P = 0.028), and improved distant metastasis-free survival (3-year DMFS, 94.6% vs 89.3%, P = 0.030). Increased rate of CTX related-skin reaction and mucositis was observed in the CTX plus CCRT arm. Multivariate analysis demonstrated the combination of CTX/NTZ was a significant protective factor for OS, DFS, and DMFS in patients treated with CCRT. Our analysis suggests that the addition of CTX/NTZ to CCRT is more effective for maximizing survival in patients with stage II-IVb NPC compared with CCRT alone.

Purpose: We used randomized trials of radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy in non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma to investigate the survival benefit of chemoradiotherapy regimens between two/three-dimensional radiotherapy (2D/3D RT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).Methods: Overall, 27 trials and 7,940 patients were included. Treatments were grouped into seven categories including RT alone, induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by RT (IC-RT), RT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (RT-AC), IC followed by RT followed by AC (IC-RT-AC), concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CRT), IC followed by CRT (IC-CRT), and CRT followed by AC (CRT-AC). To distinguish between 2D/3D RT and IMRT, three categories in IMRT were newly added, including CRT in IMRT, IC-CRT in IMRT, and CRT-AC in IMRT. The P score was used to rank the treatments.Results: Both fixed- and random-effects frequentist and Bayesian network meta-analysis models were applied, which provided similar results and the same ranking. IC-CRT was the most effective regimen compared with CRT-AC and CRT in the IMRT era for overall survival (OS) (HR, 95% CI, IC-CRT vs. CRT-AC, 0.61 (0.45, 0.82); IC-CRT vs. CRT 0.65 (0.47, 0.91)), progression-free survival (PFS) (0.69 (0.54, 0.88); 0.63 (0.49, 0.80)), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (0.58 (0.28, 1.21); 0.60 (0.42, 0.85)). CRT-AC achieved the highest survival benefit compared with CRT, and IC-CRT for loco-regional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) (0.44 (0.15, 1.28); 0.72 (0.22, 2.33)). Among these 10 categories, after distinguishing between 2D/3D RT and IMRT, IC-CRT in IMRT ranked first for OS, PFS, and DMFS, and CRT-AC in IMRT ranked first for LRRFS.Conclusion: IC-CRT should be the most suitable regimen for loco-regionally advanced NPC in the IMRT era.

No abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) could be used to predict the prognosis of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Patients (n = 1261) who were diagnosed with nonmetastatic NPC between January 2008 and December 2010 were recruited. The peripheral platelet and lymphocyte counts were retrieved, and the PLR was calculated. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to assess their association with PLR: overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). The elevated PLR, using the third quartile values (153.64) as the optimal cutoff values, was found to be associated with the significant decline in CSS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.83, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.27-2.63, P < 0.001), OS (HR 1.81, 95 % CI 1.28-2.56, P < 0.001), and DMFS (HR 1.60, 95 % CI 1.15-2.23, P = 0.005) that remained significant during the multivariable analyses (CCS HR 1.84, 95 % CI 1.26-2.67, P < 0.001; OS HR 1.83, 95 % CI 1.28-2.61, P < 0.001; DMFS HR 1.56, 95 % CI 1.11-2.19, P = 0.011). Subgroup analyses indicated that the PLR could be used to stratify prognosis effectively for patients with early- or advanced-stage NPC, and Epstein-Barr virus DNA levels of ≥1500 copies/mL. In conclusions, elevated PLR values were associated with poor CSS, OS, and DMFS for patients with NPC; this easily accessed variable based on a large amount of cases multivariate analysis is valuable for predicting prognosis in patients with NPC.