The capacity of a multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) channel with N transmit and receive antennas for highspeed railways (HSRs) is analyzed based on the 3-D modeling of the line of sight (LOS). The MIMO system utilizes a uniform linear antenna array. Instead of increasing the number of antennas or simply changing the parameters of the antenna array, such as separation and geometry, the capacity gain can be obtained by adjusting the weights of multiantenna array groups, because there are few scatterers in strong LOS environments. On the other hand, it is hard to obtain the array gain of MIMO beamforming for HSRs because of drastic changes in the receiving angle when the train travels across E-UTRAN Node B. Without changing the antenna design of Long-Term Evolution systems, this paper proposes a multiple-group multiple-antenna (MGMA) scheme that makes the columns of such a MIMO channel orthogonal by adjusting the weights among MGMA arrays, and the stable capacity gain can be obtained. The value of weights depends on the practical network topologies of the railway wireless communication system. However, the reasonable scope of group number N is less than 6. In selecting N , one important consideration is the tradeoff between practical benefit and cost of implementation.Index Terms-High-speed railway (HSR) viaducts, multipleinput-multiple-output (MIMO) channel capacity, multiple group multiple antenna (MGMA).
Abstract-Sparse code multiple access (SCMA) scheme is considered to be one promising non-orthogonal multiple access technology for the future fifth generation (5G) communications. Due to the sparse nature, message passing algorithm (MPA) has been used at the receiver to achieve close to maximum likelihood (ML) detection performance with much lower complexity. However, the complexity order of MPA is still exponential with the size of codebook and the degree of signal superposition on a given resource element. In this paper, we propose a novel low complexity iterative receiver based on expectation propagation algorithm (EPA), which reduces the complexity order from exponential to linear. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed EPA receiver achieves nearly the same block error rate (BLER) performance as the conventional message passing algorithm (MPA) receiver with orders less complexity.
Lossy decode-and-forward (DF) relaying, also referred to as lossy forwarding (LF), can significantly enhance the transmission reliability and expand the communication coverage at the cost of a small increase in computational effort compared to its DF counterpart. Furthermore, it can further simplify the operations at the relay nodes by removing the error-detecting operation, e.g., cyclic redundancy check, which is used in the conventional DF systems. Due to these advantages, LF has been intensively investigated with the aim of its applications to various cooperative communication networks with different topologies. This paper offers a comprehensive literature review on the LF relaying strategy and makes comparisons between LF and DF. Five basic exemplifying scenarios are taken into consideration. These are the three-node network, the single-source multi-relay network with direct source-to-destination link, the multiple access relay channel, the two-way relay network, and the general multi-source multi-relay network. The paper includes not only theoretical performance limit analyses, but also performance evaluation by employing low-complexity accumulator aided turbo codes at the sources and relays as well as joint decoding at the destination. As expected, the performance enhancement in terms of outage probability, frame error rate, and-outage achievable rate by LF over DF is significant, which is demonstrated in
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.