Purpose: Eribulin mesylate (E7389), a non-taxane microtubule dynamics inhibitor, is a structurally simplified, synthetic analogue of halichondrin B that acts via a mechanism distinct from conventional tubulin-targeted agents. This phase I study determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics of eribulin administered on a 3 of 4 week schedule in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Experimental Design: Patients received eribulin mesylate (1-hour i.v. infusion) on days1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Dosing began at 0.25 mg/m 2 with escalation guided by dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). MTD, DLTs, safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity were characterized. Results:Thirty-two patients received eribulin mesylate (0.25, 0.5, 0.7, 1.0, or 1.4 mg/m 2 ). Neutropenia was the principal DLT: At 1.4 mg/m 2 , two patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia, one of whom also developed grade 3 fatigue; three additional patients experienced grade 3 neutropenia and were not treated during cycle 1on day 15. Therefore, the MTD was 1.0 mg/m 2 . Fatigue (53% overall, 13% grade 3, no grade 4), nausea (41%, all grade 1/2), and anorexia (38% overall, 3% grade 3, no grade 4) were the most common eribulin-related adverse events. Eight patients reported grade 1/2 neuropathy (no grade 3/4). Eribulin pharmacokinetics were dose-proportional over the dose range studied. One patient (cervical cancer) achieved an unconfirmed partial response lasting 79 days. Ten patients reported stable disease. Conclusions: Eribulin mesylate, given on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle, exhibits manageable tolerability at 1.0 mg/m 2 with further dose escalation limited by neutropenia and fatigue.

No abstract

Hypertension and proteinuria are commonly observed side-effects for anti-angiogenic drugs targeting the VEGF pathway. In most cases, hypertension can be controlled by prescription of anti-hypertensive (AH) therapy, while proteinuria often requires dose reductions or dose delays. We aimed to construct a pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) model for hypertension and proteinuria following treatment with the experimental VEGF-inhibitor E7080, which would allow optimization of treatment, by assessing the influence of anti-hypertensive medication and dose reduction or dose delays in treating and avoiding toxicity. Data was collected from a phase I study of E7080 (n = 67), an inhibitor of multiple tyrosine kinases, among which VEGF. Blood pressure and urinalysis data were recorded weekly. Modeling was performed in NONMEM, and direct and indirect response PK–PD models were evaluated. A previously developed PK model was used. An indirect response PK–PD model described the increase in BP best, while the probability of developing proteinuria toxicity in response to exposure to E7080, was best described by a Markov transition model. This model may guide clinical interventions and provide treatment recommendations for E7080, and may serve as a template model for other drugs in this class.

Purpose CS-1008 (tigatuzumab) is a humanized, monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) agonistic antibody to human death receptor 5. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of CS-1008 dose on the biodistribution, quantitative tumor uptake, and antitumor response in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients and Methods Patients with mCRC who had received at least one course of chemotherapy were assigned to one of five dosage cohorts and infused with a weekly dose of CS-1008. Day 1 and day 36 doses were trace-labeled with indium-111 (111In), followed by whole-body planar and regional single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging at several time points over the course of 10 days. Results Nineteen patients were enrolled. 111In-CS-1008 uptake in tumor was observed in only 12 patients (63%). 111In-CS-1008 uptake and pharmacokinetics were not affected by dose or repeated drug administration. 111In-CS-1008 biodistribution showed gradual blood-pool clearance and no abnormal uptake in normal tissue. No anti–CS-1008 antibody development was detected. One patient achieved partial response (3.7 months duration), eight patients had stable disease, and 10 patients had progressive disease. Clinical benefit rate (stable disease + partial response) in patients with 111In-CS-1008 uptake in tumor was 58% versus 28% in patients with no uptake. An analysis of individual lesions showed that lesions with antibody uptake were one third as likely to progress as those without antibody uptake (P = .07). Death-receptor–5 expression in archived tumor samples did not correlate with 111In-CS-1008 uptake (P = .5) or tumor response (P = .6). Conclusion Death-receptor–5 imaging with 111In-CS-1008 reveals interpatient and intrapatient heterogeneity of uptake in tumor, is not dose dependent, and is predictive of clinical benefit in the treatment of patients who have mCRC.

Mirogabalin is a novel, preferentially selective α δ-1 ligand under investigation to treat neuropathic pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of various doses of mirogabalin in healthy subjects of different ethnicities. This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, sequential, ascending-dose study evaluated single (10-40 mg) and repeated (10, 15 mg twice a day) doses of mirogabalin in Japanese subjects, and a single dose of mirogabalin in Korean, Chinese, and white subjects. Mirogabalin was rapidly absorbed, with a median time to maximum plasma concentration of 1 hour, and rapidly eliminated, with a mean elimination half-life of 2 to 3 hours. Single-dose mirogabalin pharmacokinetic parameters were comparable between Asian and white subjects. Exposure increased proportionally as mirogabalin dose increased in Japanese subjects. Mean mirogabalin steady-state clearance and volume of distribution values were comparable across dose levels. No accumulation of mirogabalin was observed on repeated dosing in Japanese subjects. Mirogabalin had an acceptable safety and tolerability profile in Asian and white subjects at doses up to 15 mg twice a day for 7 days. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (somnolence, headache, and dizziness) were consistent with the known mechanism of action and safety profile of mirogabalin.

Purpose Berzosertib (formerly M6620) is the first-in-class inhibitor of ataxia–telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein, a key component of the DNA damage response, and being developed in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with advanced cancers. The objectives of this analysis were to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of berzosertib across multiple studies and parts, estimate inter-individual variability, and identify covariates that could explain such variability. Methods A population PK analysis was performed using the combined dataset from two phase I clinical studies (NCT02157792, EudraCT 2013-005100-34) in patients with advanced cancers receiving an intravenous infusion of berzosertib alone or in combination with chemotherapy. The analysis included data from 240 patients across 11 dose levels (18–480 mg/m2). Plasma concentration data were modeled with a non-linear mixed-effect approach and clinical covariates were evaluated. Results PK data were best described by a two-compartment linear model. For a typical patient, the estimated clearance (CL) and intercompartmental CL were 65 L/h and 295 L/h, respectively, with central and peripheral volumes estimated to be 118 L and 1030 L, respectively. Several intrinsic factors were found to influence berzosertib PK, but none were considered clinically meaningful due to a very limited effect. Model simulations indicated that concentrations of berzosertib exceeded p-Chk1 (proximal pharmacodynamic biomarker) IC50 at recommended phase II doses in combination with carboplatin, cisplatin, and gemcitabine. Conclusions There was no evidence of a clinically significant PK interaction between berzosertib and evaluated chemo-combinations. The covariate analysis did not highlight any need for dosing adjustments in the population studied to date. Clinical Trial information NCT02157792, EudraCT 2013-005100-34

No abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) of the novel oral anti-cancer agent E7820. Both a non-linear mixed effects modeling analysis and a non-compartmental analysis (NCA) were performed and results were compared. Data were obtained from a phase I dose escalation study in patients with malignant solid tumors or lymphomas. E7820 was administered daily for 28 days, followed by a washout period of 7 days prior to the start of subsequent cycles. A one compartment model with linear elimination from the central compartment was shown to give adequate fit, while absorption was described using a turnover model. Final population parameter estimates of basic PK parameters obtained with the PopPK method were (RSE): clearance, 6.24 L/h (7.1%), volume of distribution, 66.0 L (8.5%), mean transit time to the absorption compartment, 0.638 h (6.5%). The intake of food prior to dose administration slowed absorption (2.8-fold, RSE 13%) and increased relative bioavailability of E7820 by 36% (RSE 14%), although the effect on C (max) and AUC was not significant. Comparison with the NCA approach showed approximately equal PK parameter estimates and food effect measures, although specific advantages of PopPK included efficiency in use of data and more appropriate assessment of variability.