Phenol and its derivatives are common pollutants that are present in industrial discharge and are major xenobiotics that lead to water pollution. To monitor as well as improve water quality, attempts have been made in the past to engineer bacterial in vivo biosensors. However, due to the paucity of structural information, there is insufficiency in gauging the factors that lead to high sensitivity and selectivity, thereby impeding development. Here, we present the crystal structure of the sensor domain of MopR (MopR(AB)) from Acinetobacter calcoaceticus in complex with phenol and its derivatives to a maximum resolution of 2.5 Å. The structure reveals that the N-terminal residues 21-47 possess a unique fold, which are involved in stabilization of the biological dimer, and the central ligand binding domain belongs to the "nitric oxide signaling and golgi transport" fold, commonly present in eukaryotic proteins that bind long-chain fatty acids. In addition, MopR(AB) nests a zinc atom within a novel zinc binding motif, crucial for maintaining structural integrity. We propose that this motif is crucial for orchestrated motions associated with the formation of the effector binding pocket. Our studies reveal that residues W134 and H106 play an important role in ligand binding and are the key selectivity determinants. Furthermore, comparative analysis of MopR with XylR and DmpR sensor domains enabled the design of a MopR binding pocket that is competent in binding DmpR-specific ligands. Collectively, these findings pave way towards development of specific/broad based biosensors, which can act as useful tools for detection of this class of pollutants.
Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) was used to characterize the size distribution and surface chemistry of quantum dots (QDs). AUC was found to be highly sensitive to nanocrystal size, resolving nanocrystal sizes that differ by a single lattice plane. Sedimentation velocity data were used to calculate the ligand packing density at the crystal surface for different sized nanocrystals. Dihydrolipoic acid poly(ethylene glycol) was found to bind between 66 and 60% of the surface cadmium atoms for CdSe nanocrystals in the 1.54-2.59 nm radius size regime. The surface ligand chemistry was found to affect QD sedimentation, with larger ligands decreasing the sedimentation rate through an increase in particle volume and increase in frictional coefficient. Finally, AUC was used to detect and analyze protein association to QDs. Addition of bovine serum albumin (BSA) to the QD sample resulted in a reduced sedimentation rate, which may be attributed to an associated frictional drag. We calculated that one to two BSA molecules bind per QD with an associated frictional ratio of 1.2.
TIAR and HuR are mRNA-binding proteins that play important roles in the regulation of translation. They both possess three RNA recognition motifs (RRMs) and bind to AU-rich elements (AREs), with seemingly overlapping specificity. Here we show using SPR that TIAR and HuR bind to both U-rich and AU-rich RNA in the nanomolar range, with higher overall affinity for U-rich RNA. However, the higher affinity for U–rich sequences is mainly due to faster association with U-rich RNA, which we propose is a reflection of the higher probability of association. Differences between TIAR and HuR are observed in their modes of binding to RNA. TIAR is able to bind deoxy-oligonucleotides with nanomolar affinity, whereas HuR affinity is reduced to a micromolar level. Studies with U-rich DNA reveal that TIAR binding depends less on the 2′-hydroxyl group of RNA than HuR binding. Finally we show that SAXS data, recorded for the first two domains of TIAR in complex with RNA, are more consistent with a flexible, elongated shape and not the compact shape that the first two domains of Hu proteins adopt upon binding to RNA. We thus propose that these triple-RRM proteins, which compete for the same binding sites in cells, interact with their targets in fundamentally different ways.
Chemotaxis, mediated by methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein (MCP) receptors, plays an important role in the ecology of bacterial populations. This paper presents the first crystallographic analysis of the structure and ligand-induced conformational changes of the periplasmic tandem Per-Arnt-Sim (PAS) sensing domain (PTPSD) of a characterized MCP chemoreceptor. Analysis of the complex of the Campylobacter jejuni Tlp3 PTPSD with isoleucine (a chemoattractant) revealed that the PTPSD is a dimer in the crystal. The two ligand-binding sites are located in the membrane-distal PAS domains on the faces opposite to the dimer interface. Mutagenesis experiments show that the five strongly conserved residues that stabilize the main-chain moiety of isoleucine are essential for binding, suggesting that the mechanism by which this family of chemoreceptors recognizes amino acids is highly conserved. Although the fold and mode of ligand binding of the PTPSD are different from the aspartic acid receptor Tar, the structural analysis suggests that the PTPSDs of amino-acid chemoreceptors are also likely to signal by a piston displacement mechanism. The PTPSD fluctuates between piston (C-terminal helix) `up' and piston `down' states. Binding of an attractant to the distal PAS domain locks it in the closed form, weakening its association with the proximal domain and resulting in the transition of the latter into an open form, concomitant with a downward (towards the membrane) 4 Å piston displacement of the C-terminal helix. In vivo, this movement would generate a transmembrane signal by driving a downward displacement of the transmembrane helix 2 towards the cytoplasm.
Poxviruses are large DNA viruses that cause disease in animals and humans. They differ from classical enveloped viruses, because their membrane is acquired from cytoplasmic membrane precursors assembled onto a viral protein scaffold formed by the D13 protein rather than budding through cellular compartments. It was found three decades ago that the antibiotic rifampicin blocks this process and prevents scaffold formation. To elucidate the mechanism of action of rifampicin, we have determined the crystal structures of six D13-rifamycin complexes. These structures reveal that rifamycin compounds bind to a phenylalanine-rich region, or F-ring, at the membrane-proximal opening of the central channel of the D13 trimer. We show by NMR, surface plasmon resonance (SPR), and site-directed mutagenesis that A17, a membrane-associated viral protein, mediates the recruitment of the D13 scaffold by also binding to the F-ring. This interaction is the target of rifampicin, which prevents A17 binding, explaining the inhibition of viral morphogenesis. The F-ring of D13 is both conserved in sequence in mammalian poxviruses and essential for interaction with A17, defining a target for the development of assembly inhibitors. The model of the A17-D13 interaction describes a two-component system for remodeling nascent membranes that may be conserved in other large and giant DNA viruses.
Src-homology (SH2) domains are an attractive target for the inhibition of specific signalling pathways but pose the challenge of developing a truly specific inhibitor. The G7-18NATE cyclic peptide is reported to specifically inhibit the growth factor receptor bound protein 7 (Grb7) adapter protein, implicated in the progression of several cancer types, via interactions with its SH2 domain. G7-18NATE effectively inhibits the interaction of Grb7 with ErbB3 and focal adhesion kinase in cell lysates and, with the addition of a cell permeability sequence, inhibits the growth and migration of a number of breast cancer cell lines. It is thus a promising lead in the development of therapeutics targeted to Grb7. Here we investigate the degree to which G7-18NATE is specific for the Grb7-SH2 domain compared with closely related SH2 domains including those of Grb10, Grb14, and Grb2 using surface plasmon resonance. We demonstrate that G7-18NATE binds with micromolar binding affinity to Grb7-SH2 domain (K(D) = 4-6 μm) compared with 50-200 times lower affinity for Grb10, Grb14, and Grb2 but that this specificity depends critically on the presence of phosphate in millimolar concentrations. Other differences in buffer composition, including use of Tris or 2-(N-Morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid or varying the pH, do not impact on the interaction. This suggests that under cellular conditions, G7-18NATE binds with highest affinity to Grb7. In addition, our findings demonstrate that the basis of specificity of G7-18NATE binding to the Grb7-SH2 domain is via other than intrinsic structural features of the protein, representing an unexpected mode of molecular recognition.
Amyloid deposits are proteinaceous extra-cellular aggregates associated with a diverse range of disease states. These deposits are composed predominantly of amyloid fibrils, the unbranched, -sheet rich structures that result from the misfolding and subsequent aggregation of many proteins. In addition, amyloid deposits contain a number of non-fibrillar components that interact with amyloid fibrils and are incorporated into the deposits in their native folded state. The influence of a number of the non-fibrillar components in amyloid-related diseases is well established; however, the mechanisms underlying these effects are poorly understood. Here we describe the effect of two of the most important non-fibrillar components, serum amyloid P component and apolipoprotein E, upon the solution behavior of amyloid fibrils in an in vitro model system. Using analytical ultracentrifugation, electron microscopy, and rheological measurements, we demonstrate that these non-fibrillar components cause soluble fibrils to condense into localized fibrillar aggregates with a greatly enhanced local density of fibril entanglements. These results suggest a possible mechanism for the observed role of non-fibrillar components as mediators of amyloid deposition and deposit stability.The self-association of proteins into amyloid fibrils and the further aggregation of these fibrils into insoluble deposits is implicated in a diverse range of diseases, including Alzheimer's and other neurodegenerative diseases (1), type 2 diabetes (2), and a number of systemic amyloidoses (3). Over twenty proteins are known to form amyloid fibrils in vivo, and the deposits formed by each of these proteins are associated with a distinct disease state (4). Despite the lack of any similarity in primary sequence or native structure among these precursors, the underlying structures and histological properties of the deposits are remarkably similar. The bulk of the amyloid deposit is the amyloid fibrils themselves: linear unbranched assemblies of the specific precursor protein with a core cross- structure (5). Deposits also contain a number of non-fibrillar components, the identity of which is essentially independent of the precursor protein comprising the amyloid fibrils. These non-fibrillar components include the protein serum amyloid P component (SAP), 1 apolipoprotein E (apoE), as well as other proteins, glycosaminoglycans, and proteoglycans.The ubiquity and specificity of the non-fibrillar components of amyloid deposits is such that radiolabeled SAP is used clinically as a quantitative tracer of amyloid deposits (3). Furthermore, findings that SAP stabilizes in vitro amyloid deposits from phagocytic and proteolytic degradation has prompted the design of inhibitors of the SAP-amyloid interaction. One such molecule is under clinical trial against systemic amyloidosis (6). Despite this growing clinical interest in the effects of nonfibrillar components of amyloid deposits, structural details of their interactions with amyloid fibrils and deposits are entirely l...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.