Oral communication abstractsThe suture was left untied and Cesarean scar pregnancy was evacuated under ultrasound guidance using suction curettage. Once the pregnancy was successfully removed, the suture was tied and intravenous ergometrine 500 ug was administered to ensure uterine contraction. The patients were prescribed prophylactic antibiotics and the suture was removed seven days later in the outpatient clinic, under local anesthetic. Results: A total of 22 Cesarean pregnancies were removed using this method. The uterus was successfully preserved in all women. The mean estimated blood loss was 305 ml (range 50-1500 ml) and two (9%) women required blood transfusion. One (5%) woman required a second procedure to remove residual products of conception. Another (5%) case required repeat surgical evacuation of hematometra. There were no cases of pelvic infections or any other postoperative complications. Conclusion: Insertion of Shirodkar cervical suture prior to evacuation of Cesarean scar pregnancy is an effective method for securing hemostasis, which minimises the need for blood transfusion and ensures the preservation of women's fertility. Objective: To evaluate fertility outcomes after surgical and expectant management of tubal ectopic pregnancy. Methods: A database was searched to identify all patients diagnosed with a tubal ectopic pregnancy in a period of five years between 1999 and 2003. The inclusion criteria were: certain ultrasound or surgical diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy, successful expectant management or salpingectomy and sustained attempts to conceive another pregnancy following ectopic. The patients were contacted and asked about their ability to become pregnant after ectopic and the outcomes of all their subsequent pregnancies. Results: A total of 430 women were diagnosed with tubal ectopic pregnancy in a five year period. 173 women were successfully contacted, 146 (84.4%) of whom tried for another pregnancy. 97 of them (66.4%) had salpingectomy and 49 (33.6%) had successful expectant management. There was no significant difference in the mean maternal age between the two groups. 45/49 (91.8%) of women who were treated expectantly were able to conceive again, which was significantly higher in comparison to 74/97 (76.3%) in salpingectomy group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in other pregnancy outcomes. Conclusion: Future fertility is better preserved by treating tubal ectopics expectantly and this management option should be considered in all clinically stable women who desire future pregnancies. OC64Triage of patients with early pregnancy complications before ultrasound Glostrup County Hospital, University of Copenhagen, DenmarkObjective: To develop and evaluate a score system usable by emergency room (ER) nurses for the triage of patients with early pregnancy complications. Potential dangerous conditions (ectopic pregnancy, septic abortion and severe bleeding) should be recognised by the ER nurses and referred to the gynecologist immediately. Women with mild pain and light...
Introduction Occupational exposure to blood and body fluid (BBF) is an issue of serious concern for health care workers (HCWs) and presents a major risk factor for the transmission of infectious diseases such as the hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Emergency medical care (EMC) providers, particularly those working in the developing countries, appear to be at even greater risk due to nature of their prehospital work and the environment in which this work is undertaken. Purpose To investigate the knowledge, practices and exposure to BBF among public sector EMC providers in the eThekwini metropole, as part of a process of informing contextually relevant recommendations for the mitigation and management of BBF exposure in the prehospital environment. Methodology The study used a mixed methodological approach and was conducted in two phases. During the first phase quantitative data was collected using a questionnaire which was distributed to a randomly selected and representative sample of EMC providers employed by the Emergency Medical Rescue Services (EMRS) in eThekwini. Phase two included the collection of qualitative data through structured interviews which were conducted with the information-rich respondents who had participated in phase one. Through methodological triangulation, the data from Phase one and Phase two were integrated to obtain an in-depth understanding of the knowledge, practices and exposure to BBF among public sector EMC providers in the eThekwini metropole. Results A total of 41 (43%) of the 96 participants indicated that they had been exposed to BBF at some point in their careers. The majority (n = 26, 63%) of such BBF exposures was due to needlestick injuries (NSI) with the procedure involved in gaining intravenous (IV) access accounting for most (n = 14, 34%) of the BBF exposures. The main contributing factor in relation to most (n = 25, 61%) of the exposures was combative patients. There was a significant relationship between the qualifications of the EMS providers and the type of BBF exposure (p = .016). It was found that a higher proportion of intermediate life support (ILS) providers sustained NSI compared to advanced life support (ALS) and basic life support (BLS) providers, whilst a higher percentage of ALS providers sustained BBF exposure to their eyes, while basic life support providers sustained more BBF exposures to broken skin as compared to ALS and ILS providers. Seventy nine percent (n = 76) of the respondents were unable to identify all of the presented risks of their BBF exposure, while 80.2% (n = 77) did not know where their organisation’s BBF exposure guideline was kept. There was a significant relationship between the EMC providers’ qualification and their knowledge of the risks of BBF exposure (p = .01), with ILS providers identifying more risks associated with BBF exposures compared to ALS and BLS providers. Half of the respondents (n = 48) were unable to identify all the presented examples of universal precautions. The association between qualifications and knowledge of universal precautions was significant (p= .002). Advanced life support and ILS providers demonstrated greater knowledge of BBF exposure compared to BLS providers. Inadequate BBF exposure training and a lack of clear direction regarding BBF exposure protocols were identified as possible reasons for the inadequate knowledge of both the risks of BBF exposure and universal precautions. Most (n = 87, 90.6%) of the respondents indicated that they always used gloves when there was a perceived risk of BBF exposure, while 27.1% (n = 26) and 15.6% (n = 15) indicated that they never used eye protection and facemasks respectively. Possible reasons for the infrequent use of personal protective equipment (PPE) include the unavailability of PPE, and EMC providers not anticipating the BBF exposure. The majority of the respondents (n = 74, 77.1%) indicated that they always recapped needles, 95.8% (n = 92) removed needles from syringes and 46.9% (n = 45) disposed of sharps containers when completely full. Conclusion The study found that the EMC providers employed by the EMRS in eThekwini do not possess adequate knowledge of either BBF exposure or universal precautions, which may be one of the contributing factors to the high prevalence of BBF exposures revealed in this study. As the burden of disease continues to grow, urgent intervention is required to mitigate BBF exposure in all HCWs, but particularly in the case of EMC providers who are frontline staff who often have no prior knowledge of the patients they may see before the initial contact. As informed by this study interventions may include the provision of BBF exposure training, the circulation of effective BBF exposure guidelines and the adequate availability of PPE.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.