Background: HIV is the causative agent of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS), an infectious disease with increasing incidence worldwide. Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) play an important role in the treatment of AIDS. Although, many compounds are already being used as anti-HIV drugs, research for the development of new inhibitors continues as the virus develops resistant strains. Methods: The best features of available NNRTIs were taken into account for the design of novel inhibitors. PASS (Prediction of activity spectra for substances) prediction program and molecular docking studies for the selection of designed compounds were used for the synthesis. Compounds were synthesized using conventional and microwave irradiation methods and HIV RT inhibitory action was evaluated by colorimetric photometric immunoassay. Results: The evaluation of HIV-1 RT inhibitory activity revealed that seven compounds have significantly lower ΙC50 values than nevirapine (0.3 μΜ). It was observed that the activity of compounds depends not only on the nature of substituent and it position in benzothiazole ring but also on the nature and position of substituents in benzene ring. Conclusion: Twenty four of the tested compounds exhibited inhibitory action lower than 4 μΜ. Seven of them showed better activity than nevirapine, while three of the compounds exhibited IC50 values lower than 5 nM. Two compounds 9 and 10 exhibited very good inhibitory activity with IC50 1 nM.
The present study aimed to assess the pharmacological anticancer profile of three natural and five synthetic sesquiterpenes developed by total chemical synthesis. To this end, their properties at the cellular and molecular level were evaluated in a panel of normal and cancer cell lines. The results obtained by performing cytotoxicity assays and gene expression analysis by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction showed that: i) Among the sesquiterpene derivatives analyzed, VDS58 exhibited a notable anticancer profile within attached (U-87 MG and MCF-7) and suspension (K562 and MEL-745) cancer cell cultures; however, U-87 MG cells were able to recover their proliferation capacity rapidly after 48 h of exposure; ii) gene expression profiling of U-87 MG cells, in contrast to K562 cells, showed a transient induction of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (CDKN1) expression; iii) the expression levels of transforming growth factor β1 (TGFB1) increased after 12 h of exposure of U-87 MG cells to VDS58 and were maintained at this level throughout the treatment period; iv) in K562 cells exposed to VDS58, TGFB1 expression levels were upregulated for 48 h and decrease afterwards; and v) the re-addition of VDS58 in U-87 MG cultures pretreated with VDS58 resulted in a notable increase in the expression of caspases (CASP3 and CASP9), BCL2‑associated agonist of cell death (BAD), cyclin D1, CDK6, CDKN1, MYC proto-oncogene bHLH transcription factor (MYC), TGFB1 and tumor suppressor protein p53. This upregulation persisted only for 24 h for the majority of genes, as afterwards, only the expression of TGFB1 and MYC was maintained at high levels. Through bioinformatic pathway analysis of RNA-Seq data of parental U-87 MG and K562 cells, substantial variation was reported in the expression profiles of the genes involved in the regulation of the cell cycle. This was associated with the differential pharmacological profiles observed in the same cells exposed to VDS58. Overall, the data presented in this study provide novel insights into the molecular mechanisms of action of sesquiterpene derivatives by dysregulating the expression levels of genes associated with the cell cycle of cancer cells.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.