Elderkin Brook and M ill Brook are tributaries of the Cornwallis River and were investigated with the intent of understanding the geological conditions that could influence both habitat quality and river restoration efforts. The Cornwallis River and its tributaries have been the focus of restoration efforts in an attempt to re-establish brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) populations. Both tributaries are relatively short, highgradient headwater streams that are ungraded along much of their length.Data from Elderkin Brook indicate that pyrite-rich slate of the Kentville and Halifax formations that dominate the watershed geology do not govern the pH of the river discharge. The carbonaceous New Canaan Formation buffers regional groundwater and has resulted in elevated pH levels (7.5-8.0). Springs in the ungraded portion of Elderkin Brook introduce slightly acidic iron-rich groundwater into the system and, upon contact with the alkaline discharge, have produced sporadic masses of flocculated ferric hydroxide (Fe(OH) 3). Along the upper reaches o f M ill Brook, iron-rich acidic groundwater (pH 5.0-5.5) originating from the Kentville Formation influences the chemistry of the river discharge during low-flow conditions. However, groundwater input from the porous, calcareous-cemented Wolfville Formation that underlies the lower portion of Mill Brook has resulted in locally elevated pH levels (6.0-6.5) and the precipitation of extensive Fe(OH)3 deposits.In both Elderkin Brook and M ill Brook, the precipitation, deposition and preservation of ferric hydroxide is controlled by regional and local, geological and hydrogeological conditions. During the winter and spring, increased discharge and dilution of the groundwater chemistry by precipitation keep iron in either solution or suspension. During low-flow periods (primarily in the fall) flocculated ferric hydroxide accumulations develop coincident with the spawning of both fish species. These conditions result in both temporally and spatially constrained habitat degradation that may be difficult to recognise using the habitat evaluation techniques that are presently being employed by river management groups.

No abstract