It has been proposed that the maintenance of phonological information in verbal working memory (vWM) is carried by a domain-specific short-term storage centre-the phonological loop-which is composed of a phonological store and an articulatory rehearsal system. Several brain regions including the left posterior inferior frontal gyrus (pIFG) and anterior supramarginal gyri (aSMG) are thought to support these processes. However, recent behavioural evidence suggests that verbal and non-verbal auditory information may be processed as part of a unique domain general short-term storage centre instead of through specialized subsystems such as the phonological loop. In the current study, we used a single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) delayed priming paradigm with speech (syllables) and acoustically complex non-speech sounds (bird songs) to examine whether the pIFG and aSMG are involved in the processing of verbal information or, alternatively, in the processing of any complex auditory information. Our results demonstrate that TMS delivered to both regions had an effect on performance for speech and non-speech stimuli, but the nature of the effect was different.That is, priming was reduced for the speech sounds because TMS facilitated the detection of different but not identical stimuli, and accuracy was decreased for non-speech sounds. Since TMS interfered with both speech and non-speech sounds, these findings support the existence of an auditory short-term storage centre located within the dorsal auditory stream.
The involvement of the motor system in action language comprehension is a hotly debated topic in cognitive neuroscience and psychology. Recent studies suggest that primary motor cortex (M1) response to action language is context-sensitive rather than automatic and necessary. Specifically, semantic polarity (i.e. affirmative/negative valence) appears to modulate the intensity of this response, which is stronger for affirmative action sentences. The aim of our study was to examine further the context sensitivity of M1 response. More specifically, we aimed to determine whether M1 response follows semantic polarity or the core meaning of the sentence using two-part action sentences containing interacting polarities. Modulations of M1 activity were recorded using surface electromyography of the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand in 22 healthy participants. Our results show an increase in M1 activity during the first part of the sentence, regardless of semantic polarity. This response was then modulated by the polarity of the second part of the sentence, which carried crucial information regarding the action. These observations suggest that M1 differentially responds to different aspects of action sentences, one response being automatic and the other following the core meaning of the sentence. Our results thus contribute to clarifying the nature of the motor response to action language, which is key to develop more comprehensive and plausible neurobiological models of language processing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.