Background Previous research has demonstrated a correlation between hand grip strength (HGS) and muscle strength. This study aims to determine the relationship between HGS and muscle mass in older Asian adults. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) records of 907 older adults (239 (26.4%) men and 668 (73.6%) women) at one medical institution in Taipei, Taiwan, from January 2019, to December 2020. Average age was 74.80 ± 9.43 and 72.93 ± 9.09 for the males and females respectively. The inclusion criteria were: 1) aged 60 and older, 2) underwent a full-body DXA scan, and 3) performed hand grip measurements. Patients with duplicate results, incomplete records, stroke history, and other neurological diseases were excluded. Regional skeletal muscle mass was measured using DXA. HGS was measured using a Jamar handheld dynamometer. Results Total lean muscle mass (kg) averaged 43.63 ± 5.81 and 33.16 ± 4.32 for the males and females respectively. Average HGS (kg) was 28.81 ± 9.87 and 19.19 ± 6.17 for the males and females respectively. In both sexes, HGS and regional muscle mass consistently declined after 60 years of age. The rates of decline per decade in upper and lower extremity muscle mass and HGS were 7.06, 4.95, and 12.30%, respectively, for the males, and 3.36, 4.44, and 12.48%, respectively, for the females. In men, HGS significantly correlated with upper (r = 0.576, p < 0.001) and lower extremity muscle mass (r = 0.532, p < 0.001). In women, the correlations between HGS and upper extremity muscle mass (r = 0.262, p < 0.001) and lower extremity muscle mass (r = 0.364, p < 0.001) were less strong, though also statistically significant. Conclusion Muscle mass and HGS decline with advancing age in both sexes, though the correlation is stronger in men. HGS measurements are an accurate proxy for muscle mass in older Asian adults, particularly in males.
Purpose: Given that early identification of breast cancer type allows for less-invasive therapies, we aimed to develop a machine learning model to discriminate between ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and minimally invasive breast cancer (MIBC). Methods: In this retrospective study, the health records of 420 women who underwent biopsies between 2010 and 2020 to confirm breast cancer were collected. A trained XGBoost algorithm was used to classify cancers as either DCIS or MIBC using clinical characteristics, mammographic findings, ultrasonographic findings, and histopathological features. Its performance was measured against other methods using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision, and F1 score. Results: The model was trained using 357 women and tested using 63 women with an overall 420 patients (mean [standard deviation] age, 57.1 [12.0] years). The model performed well when feature importance was determined, reaching an accuracy of 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76–0.91), an AUC of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.87–0.95), a specificity of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.67–0.83), and a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.76–0.94). Conclusion: The XGBoost model, combining clinical, mammographic, ultrasonographic, and histopathologic findings, can be used to discriminate DCIS from MIBC with an accuracy equivalent to that of experienced radiologists, thereby giving patients the widest range of therapeutic options.
Purpose: We aimed to develop a novel interpretable artificial intelligence (AI) model algorithm focusing on automatic detection and classification of various patterns of calcification distribution in mammographic images using a unique graph convolution approach. Materials and methods: Images from 292 patients, which showed calcifications according to the mammographic reports and diagnosed breast cancers, were collected. The calcification distributions were classified as diffuse, segmental, regional, grouped, or linear. Excluded were mammograms with (1) breast cancer with multiple lexicons such as mass, asymmetry, or architectural distortion without calcifications; (2) hidden calcifications that were difficult to mark; or (3) incomplete medical records. Results: A graph-convolutional-network-based model was developed. A total of 581 mammographic images from 292 cases of breast cancer were divided based on the calcification distribution pattern: diffuse (n = 67), regional (n = 115), group (n = 337), linear (n = 8), or segmental (n = 54). The classification performances were measured using metrics including precision, recall, F1 score, accuracy, and multi-class area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The proposed model achieved a precision of 0.522 ± 0.028, sensitivity of 0.643 ± 0.017, specificity of 0.847 ± 0.009, F1 score of 0.559 ± 0.018, accuracy of 64.325 ± 1.694%, and area under the curve of 0.745 ± 0.030; thus, the method was found to be superior compared to all baseline models. The predicted linear and diffuse classifications were highly similar to the ground truth, and the predicted grouped and regional classifications were also superior compared to baseline models. The prediction results are interpretable using visualization methods to highlight the important calcification nodes in graphs. Conclusions: The proposed deep neural network framework is an AI solution that automatically detects and classifies calcification distribution patterns on mammographic images highly suspected of showing breast cancers. Further study of the AI model in an actual clinical setting and additional data collection will improve its performance.
The morphology and distribution of microcalcifications are the most important descriptors for radiologists to diagnose breast cancer based on mammograms. However, it is very challenging and time-consuming for radiologists to characterize these descriptors manually, and there also lacks of effective and automatic solutions for this problem. We observed that the distribution and morphology descriptors are determined by the radiologists based on the spatial and visual relationships among calcifications. Thus, we hypothesize that this information can be effectively modelled by learning a relationship-aware representation using graph convolutional networks (GCNs). In this study, we propose a multi-task deep GCN method for automatic characterization of both the morphology and distribution of microcalcifications in mammograms. Our proposed method transforms morphology and distribution characterization into node and graph classification problem and learns the representations concurrently. We trained and validated the proposed method in an in-house dataset and public DDSM dataset with 195 and 583 cases,respectively. The proposed method reaches good and stable results with distribution AUC at 0.812±0.043 and 0.873±0.019, morphology AUC at 0.663±0.016 and 0.700±0.044 for both in-house and public datasets. In both datasets, our proposed method demonstrates statistically significant improvements compared to the baseline models. The performance improvements brought by our proposed multi-task mechanism can be attributed to the association between the distribution and morphology of calcifications in mammograms, which is interpretable using graphical visualizations and consistent with the definitions of descriptors in the standard BI-RADS guideline. In short, we explore, for the first time, the
UNSTRUCTURED Purpose: To develop a novel artificial intelligence (AI) model algorithm focusing on automatic detection and classification of various patterns of calcification distribution in mammographic images using a unique graph convolution approach. Materials and methods: Images from 200 patients classified as Category 4 or 5 according to the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Database System, which showed calcifications according to the mammographic reports and diagnosed breast cancers. The calcification distributions were classified as either diffuse, segmental, regional, grouped, or linear. Excluded were mammograms with (1) breast cancer as a single or combined characterization such as a mass, asymmetry, or architectural distortion with or without calcifications; (2) hidden calcifications that were difficult to mark; or (3) incomplete medical records. Results: A graph convolutional network-based model was developed. 401 mammographic images from 200 cases of breast cancer were divided based on calcification distribution pattern: diffuse (n = 24), regional (n = 111), group (n = 201), linear (n = 8) or segmental (n = 57). The classification performances were measured using metrics including precision, recall, F1 score, accuracy and multi-class area under receiver operating characteristic curve. The proposed achieved precision of 0.483 ± 0.015, sensitivity of 0.606 (0.030), specificity of 0.862 ± 0.018, F1 score of 0.527 ± 0.035, accuracy of 60.642% ± 3.040% and area under the curve of 0.754 ± 0.019, finding method to be superior compared to all baseline models. The predicted linear and diffuse classifications were highly similar to the ground truth, and the predicted grouped and regional classifications were also superior compared to baseline models. Conclusion: The proposed deep neural network framework is an AI solution to automatically detect and classify calcification distribution patterns on mammographic images highly suspected of showing breast cancers. Further study of the AI model in an actual clinical setting and additional data collection will improve its performance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.