The purpose of this study was to examine the nature and potential effects of disclosure patterns and unsupportive social interactions in breast cancer patients. Disclosure, the thoughts and feelings people communicate to others, and unsupportive social interactions, the upsetting or unsupportive responses people receive from others, have been infrequently studied in breast cancer patients. Sixty-six early stage breast cancer patients diagnosed less than one year completed a written questionnaire. Results indicated that the women reported confiding in family and friends more than in mental health workers. Fears of recurrence and worries about the effects of the illness on family members were the most important concerns, whereas concerns about body image were the least troublesome. Failure to disclose concerns was associated with low social support, high unsupportive social interactions, and low emotional well-being. Most of the unsupportive responses received from other people were either behaviors of minimizing or distancing. Unsupportive reactions were significantly associated with greater role limitations due to emotional problems and decreased social functioning. Implications for interventions and future research are discussed.

Latinas have the fastest rising incidence of breast cancer. Yet, little data are available about Latinas' breast cancer treatment experiences. Aims were to: (1) identify factors in Latinas' treatment decision making and (2) develop and pilot a decision support intervention. Thirty-seven Latinas diagnosed with breast cancer participated. Qualitative data were used to identify intervention messages. Most women desired help in asking questions. Women were most concerned about chemotherapy side effects. Cultural values (e.g. personalismo, familismo) helped structure intervention messages. In phase two, participants completed a face-to-face skill-building session with a trained breast cancer survivor. Women found the intervention acceptable and reported better communication and decision-making skills. Interventions that focus on cultural strengths may improve Latinas treatment experiences and informed decision making.

Physicians could provide specific and limited information to patients and family members to promote realistic expectations and optimum decisions about chemotherapy, given the risks involved in this treatment modality. Interventions should be developed and tested to enhance communication that is sensitive to older women's culture, family structure, illness experiences, preferences, and expectations.

Body image is important for many older women, and receiving treatment consistent with preferences about appearance was important in long-term mental health outcomes. Health professionals should elicit preferences about appearance from women and provide treatment choices in concordance with these preferences. Enhancing shared decision making has the potential to improve mental health in older breast cancer survivors.

No abstract

A one-year intervention project was developed and implemented to demonstrate the utility of using community organization methods to mobilize a rural, predominantly minority work site community toward smoking and dietary change. This intervention for smoking and dietary change was conducted in a rural work site (n = 235 at baseline) and guided by employees. It involved activities to change the work site environment and the behaviors of individuals. A community advisory board (n = 15) made up of members of the work site was established, and it met monthly with members from the research team to design and implement nine cancer prevention activities that were targeted to the needs of this community. Activities and information were disseminated to the employees during a nine-month period. Surveys were administered prior to and following the delivery of the intervention. This project was successful in engaging a rural manufacturing work site community in thinking about cancer prevention strategies. Results of this intervention demonstrated significant increases in numbers of smoking cessation attempts, reported fruit and vegetable consumption, self-efficacy for dietary change and perceived risk for cancer. Work site social norms changed as evidenced by employee perceptions of co-worker support of dietary and smoking change (all ts > 1.95, all Ps < 0.05). Other results with marginal statistical significance (P < .015) but potentially useful for future studies include increased intentions to reduce the fat in the diet. In light of the low-intensity and time-limited nature of this community organization intervention, the observed changes in dietary and smoking behaviors are encouraging and support the use of these strategies in rural, culturally diverse work sites.

BackgroundThere are few comprehensive reviews of breast cancer outcomes in older women. We synthesize data to describe key findings and gaps in knowledge about the outcomes of breast cancer in this population.MethodsWe reviewed research published between 1995 and June 2003 on breast cancer quality of life and outcomes among women aged 65 and older treated for breast cancer. Outcomes included communication, satisfaction, and multiple quality of life domains.ResultsFew randomized trials or cohort studies that measured quality of life after treatment focused exclusively on older women. Studies from older women generally noted that, with the exception of axillary dissection, type of surgical treatment generally had no effect on long-term outcomes. In contrast, the processes of care, such as choosing therapy, good patient-physician communication, receiving treatment concordant with preferences about body image, and low perceptions of bias, were associated with better quality of life and satisfaction.ConclusionsWith the exception of axillary dissection, the processes of care, and not the therapy itself, seem to be the most important determinants of long-term quality of life in older women.

With the aging of the U.S. population and rising breast cancer incidence with advancing age, the absolute number of women aged 65 years and older diagnosed with and surviving breast cancer will dramatically increase over the coming decades. Despite this demographic imperative, we know little about the impact of adjuvant therapies in this age group. We synthesized data to describe key findings and gaps in knowledge about the outcomes of adjuvant breast cancer treatment in women aged 65 years and and older ("older women"). We reviewed research published between 1995 and June 2005 on breast cancer outcomes among older women treated with adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Outcomes included communication, emotional distress, satisfaction, and multiple quality-of-life domains. Only 16 articles focused exclusively on older women and chemotherapy; and only one included a large sample of older women (N = 1755). Most common domains included comorbidities, symptoms, and survival. Of the 13 clinical trials and three observational studies we reviewed, only one clinical trial measured quality of life and psychological factors such as coping. None of the studies examined patient preferences or patient-physician communication (processes of care) in older women. Few studies have been designed to specifically evaluate adjuvant therapy processes and outcomes among older women, especially interactions between treatment and comorbidity, and the impact of the processes of care on outcomes. In addition, only narrow segments of the older population with breast cancer (e.g., well-educated, nonminority women) have been included in trials to date. Thus, at present we do not have sufficient data to assist physicians and their older patients in developing adjuvant treatment decisions and plans tailored to older women's needs, preferences, and concerns.