PurposeThe Quality of Care Collaborative Australia (QuoCCA) provided pediatric palliative care education across Australia with the aim of improving the quality of services. The education was delivered through a collaboration of six tertiary pediatric palliative care services, through funding for Nurse Educators, Medical Fellows, a National Allied Health Educator, and national project staff.MethodsPre- and post-education surveys were completed by participants immediately following the education, and confidence and knowledge were measured along nine domains related to the care of the child and family, including managing a new referral, symptom management, medications, preparing the family, and using local agencies.ResultsEducation was provided to over 5,500 health and human service professionals in 337 education sessions across Australia between May 2015 and June 2017. Paired pre- and post-surveys were completed by 969 participants and showed a significant improvement in all the domains measured. Those with no experience in caring for children receiving palliative care showed greater improvement following QuoCCA education compared to those with experience, although the latter had higher scores both before and after education. Similarly, those with no previous education showed greater improvement, but those with previous education showed higher scores overall. Participants in full-day and half-day sessions showed greater improvement than those in short day sessions. Thus, the dosage of education in the length of the sessions and prior attendance impacted knowledge and confidence. Topics requested by the participants were analyzed. Educator learnings were that education was more effective when tailored to the needs of the audience, was interactive, and included story-telling, case studies, and parent experiences.ConclusionThese results encouraged the continuation of the provision of education to novice and experienced professionals who care for children with a life-limiting condition, leading to higher levels of confidence and knowledge. The learnings from this evaluation will be transferred into the second round of funding for the national QuoCCA education project. The next stage will focus on developing simulation and interactive training, accessible training modules, and videos on a national website.

Background: An increasing number of incidents involving aggressive behaviour in acute care hospitals are being witnessed worldwide. Acute care hospital staff are often not trained or confident in managing aggression. Competent management of clinical aggression is important to maintain staff and patient safety. Training programmes for acute care staff are infrequently described in the literature and rarely reported for paediatric staff. Simulation training allows practice of skills without patient risk and may be more effective than traditional teaching formats for aggression management. Aim and design: The aim of this proof of concept study was to develop a simulation-based education session on aggression management for acute care paediatric staff based on best practice principles, to evaluate the acceptability of this training programme and to gain an understanding of the impact of the training on participants' perceived confidence in managing clinical aggression. Two separate simulation exercises were delivered as a 2-h component of a hospital management of clinical aggression (MOCA) training day. Participants completed a written survey immediately prior to, at completion of the simulation-based group training, and at 3-6 months following the simulation training. Findings: Nine training days were conducted in 2017 for nursing, medical, allied health, education and security staff with a total of 146 participants (83% were acute care nurses). Two thirds (68%) of participants had experienced clinical aggression as part of their routine work, with 51% overall reporting a lack of confidence managing these patients. Immediately following the simulation training, 80% of all participants reported feeling more confident in managing clinical aggression, 47% reported a 1-point increase in confidence, whilst 33% of participants reported a 2-or 3-point increase. At 3-6 months post-training, 66% of respondents (N = 44) reported continued confidence in managing aggression with 100% of participants stating they would recommend simulation training to colleagues.

Aim: Following the establishment of paediatric palliative care services over recent decades, this study sought to identify information to inform future policy and practice. Methods: A rapid review using thematic synthesis was conducted to synthesise existing information about improving paediatric palliative care. Information was extracted in relation to key areas for investment and change: quality, access, advance care planning, skills, research, collaboration and community awareness. Results: A total of 2228 literature sources were screened, with 369 included. Synthesised information identified clear ways to improve quality of care, access to care, advance care planning, and research and data collection. The synthesis identified knowledge gaps in understanding how to improve skills in paediatric palliative care, collaboration across Australian jurisdictions and community awareness. Conclusions: The findings of this review bring together information from a vast range of sources to provide action-oriented information to target investment and change in paediatric palliative care over the coming decades.

Aim: To assess clinicians' experience, attitudes and confidence with advance care planning (ACP) at a quaternary paediatric referral centre using a learning-needs survey, and then apply this information to develop and examine the feasibility of simulation-based education for this topic. Methods: An electronic learning-needs survey was distributed to medical, nursing and allied health clinicians from departments who provide primary care for children with life-limiting conditions. Results were incorporated into the design of a simulation-based education session which was piloted with the Royal Children's Hospital Oncology Department. Results: A total of 157 learning-needs surveys were included in analysis, and included quantitative and qualitative responses from nursing, allied health, senior and junior medical staff from intensive care, general and subspecialty medical teams. Most (75.0%) participants had participated in ACP discussions previously. Only 40.1% of participants felt confident to assess appropriate timing of, and 45.2% felt adequately prepared to participate in ACP discussions. Barriers identified were both clinician and patient/parent related, including clinicians not knowing when to address issues (43.9%) or what to say (21.0%). Participants indicated that ACP discussions are most frequently initiated when death is clearly imminent. Following a pilot of simulation-based education with the oncology department, 90% of participants expressed confidence to participate in ACP discussions. Conclusions: Barriers to paediatric ACP, including lack of clinician training, continue to contribute to delayed conversations. Simulation-based education is a valuable and feasible educational tool that can increase clinicians' understanding and confidence in this area.

Educational opportunities for practitioners working with children requiring palliative care are central to future development within the speciality across countries. International educational initiatives involving a range of professionals, seem opportune in affording learning with and from others working within the field. This paper examines one such initiative, the use of an international asynchronous discussion forum with students in two countries (Australia and Belfast UK) who themselves work with children and families. The innovation is examined and student perspectives of the forum's value are presented. Students endorsed the value of the forum, identifying three main areas of learning 'Differences across locations within countries'; 'respecting different views and being open' and 'need for continued learning within children's palliative care'. The overarching theme 'We are not alone' supported the idea that participation in the international discussion forum enabled students to see a broader perspective. Ideas for future developments of similar forums are also explored. words (max)

Background and objective: Aggression and high-risk behaviors, which can result in behavioral emergencies, are common in children with autism and can be magnified in the hospital environment. Children with autism, with or without intellectual disability, have complex communication needs which require a sophisticated level of knowledge, understanding and skill from health care professionals. Pediatric acute care nursing staff are often not trained and lack confidence in managing children with autism. The purpose of this study was to conduct a pilot and feasibility cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) of simulation-based education for staff in managing behavioral emergencies with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in the hospital setting.Methods: This study used a mixed method, to explore the acceptability and feasibility of delivering a large-scale cluster RCT and assess trial processes including recruitment, completion rates, contamination, and outcome measures. The simulation-based training format comprised two scenarios involving an adolescent with autism, intellectual disability and aggressive behaviors. Two pediatric wards of similar size and patient complexity were selected to participate in the study and randomized to receive either simulation-based education plus web-based education materials or web-based education materials only.  Results: The RCT design is feasible with recruitment, acceptability and completion rates reaching target. Self-perceived baseline levels of confidence in managing aggression in children were mid-range and lower for children with autism and intellectual disability. Forty to fifty percent of intervention participants rated the training highly in terms of developing skills and knowledge respectively. The mean group score for observer ratings of de-escalation across four simulations was 20 out of a possible 35. Data for ward aggression were not collected.Conclusions: Simulation-based education is an acceptable training format for acute care pediatric nurses. This study is feasible to conduct as a cluster RCT with some modifications to this protocol including assessment of baseline differences in confidence. Observer ratings of de-escalation skills indicated that more than one episode of training may be required for acute care pediatric staff to successfully de-escalate aggressive incidents. As such, we will use repeated simulation scenario exercises for each intervention group in the next trial.

No abstract