INTRODUCTION: Liver transplantation (LT) remains the gold standard for treatment of end-stage liver disease. Given the increasing number of liver transplantation in females of reproductive age, our aim was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating pregnancy outcomes after LT. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched for relevant studies. Study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction were conducted independently by 2 reviewers. Estimates of pregnancy-related outcomes in LT recipients were generated and pooled across studies using the random-effects model. RESULTS: A comprehensive search identified 1,430 potential studies. Thirty-eight studies with 1,131 pregnancies among 838 LT recipients were included in the analysis. Mean maternal age at pregnancy was 27.8 years, with a mean interval from LT to pregnancy of 59.7 months. The live birth rate was 80.4%, with a mean gestational age of 36.5 weeks. The rate of miscarriages (16.7%) was similar to the general population (10%–20%). The rates of preterm birth, preeclampsia, and cesarean delivery (32.1%, 12.5%, and 42.2%, respectively) among LT recipients were all higher than the rates for the general US population (9.9%, 4%, and 32%, respectively). Most analyses were associated with substantial heterogeneity. DISCUSSION: Pregnancy outcomes after LT are favorable, but the risk of maternal and fetal complications is increased. Large studies along with consistent reporting to national registries are necessary for appropriate patient counseling and to guide clinical management of LT recipients during pregnancy.
Removal of sharp foreign bodies via upper endoscopy is common; however, management in the setting of distal migration is not well-documented. We report two cases of objects beyond the ligament of Treitz, including successful extraction of a 4.4 cm sewing pin from the cecum using hot biopsy forceps with a protector hood to shield colonic mucosa, and in a separate case, a 3.4 cm glass shard from the ascending colon using a Roth Net retriever. We demonstrate that monitoring with serial radiographs and examination may allow for supervised passage of sharp objects into the colon, where removal can be performed safely via colonoscopy.
Objectives: Portal vein thrombosis is commonly associated with cirrhosis. The effect of alcoholic cirrhosis on portal vein thrombosis prevalence and mortality has not been well studied. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing the 2000–2014 National Inpatient Sample Database. We included patients older than 18 years with decompensated cirrhosis without a history of liver transplantation or hepatocellular carcinoma. We further identified patients with alcoholic cirrhosis vs. non-alcoholic cirrhosis. Primary outcomes included the risk and mortality of portal vein thrombosis in alcoholic cirrhosis. Secondary outcomes included trends of portal vein thrombosis prevalence and mortality in alcoholic cirrhosis, implications of portal vein thrombosis on complications in alcoholic cirrhosis vs. non-alcoholic cirrhosis, and risk of venous thromboembolism in alcoholic cirrhosis. Results: Among 1 892 271 patients with decompensated alcoholic cirrhosis, portal vein thrombosis prevalence was 1.3%. Alcoholic cirrhosis was associated with lower risk of portal vein thrombosis (odds ratio 0.76, P < 0.001) and venous thromboembolism (odds ratio 0.69, P < 0.001) compared to non-alcoholic cirrhosis. Portal vein thrombosis contributed to increased mortality (odds ratio 1.19, P < 0.001) in alcoholic cirrhosis. Portal vein thrombosis prevalence among alcoholic cirrhosis increased while mortality declined during the study period. Conclusion: Thrombotic events including portal vein thrombosis and venous thromboembolism were found in less frequent association with alcoholic cirrhosis compared with non-alcoholic cirrhosis. Despite this, the higher in-hospital mortality found among portal vein thrombosis with alcoholic cirrhosis should prompt careful consideration of management.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.