No abstract

No abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the medium-term results of corticosteroid injections for Morton’s neuroma. Methods: This was a prospective follow-up study of a previous randomized controlled trial (RCT). Forty-five neuromas in 36 patients were injected with a single corticosteroid injection either with or without ultrasound guidance. As the results of the RCT showed no difference in outcomes between techniques, the data were pooled for the purpose of this study. Questionnaires were sent out and responses were collected via mail or telephone interview. Results were available in 42 out of 45 neuromas. There was a sex split of 68% female/32% male with a mean age of 62.6 years (SD, 12 years). Results: At mean follow-up of 4.8 years (SD, 0.91 years), the original corticosteroid injection remained effective in 36% ( n = 16) of the patients. In these cases, the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score ( P < .001) and Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire Index (MOxFQ Index) ( P = .001) remained significantly better than preintervention scores. The remaining cases underwent either a further injection or surgery. Fifty-five percent of the 11 neuromas that received a second injection continued to be asymptomatic in the medium term. Overall, 44% ( n = 20) of the initial cohort underwent surgical excision by the medium-term follow-up. The VAS score, MOxFQ Index, and satisfaction scale score across all groups were not significantly different. Conclusion: Corticosteroid injections for Morton’s neuroma remained effective in over a third of cases for up to almost 5 years. A positive outcome at 1 year following a corticosteroid injection was reasonably predictive of a prolonged effect from the injection. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective comparative study.

No abstract

No abstract

ObjectiveTo ascertain the priorities of research in surgical interventions and aftercare in foot and ankle conditions in adults, from inclusive viewpoints of patients, carers, allied professionals and clinicians, as a collaboration with James Lind Alliance (JLA) Priority Setting Partnership. Setting A UK-based national study organised through British Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (BOFAS).DesignA cross-section of both medical and allied professionals, with patient involvement, submitted their ‘top priorities’ pertaining to foot and ankle pathology, using both paper and web-based formats, which were synthesised into the primary priorities. Following this, workshop-based reviews were used to determine the top 10 priorities.ParticipantsAdult patients, carers, allied professionals and clinicians who have experienced or managed foot and ankle conditions in the UK.MethodsA transparent and well-established process developed by JLA was carried out by a steering group of 16 members. A broad survey was designed and disseminated to the public via clinics, BOFAS meetings and website, JLA platforms and electronic media to establish potential research priority questions. Surveys were analysed and initial questions were categorised and cross-referenced with the literature. Those questions that were out of scope and sufficiently answered by research were excluded. The unanswered questions were ranked by the public via a second survey. The top 10 questions were finalised via an extensive workshop.Results472 questions from 198 responders were received from the primary survey. 71% (140) from healthcare professionals, 24% (48) from patients and carers and 5% (10) from other responders. 142 questions were out of scope, leaving 330 questions. These were summarised into 60 indicative questions. Reviewing against current literature, 56 questions were left. From the secondary survey, there were 291 respondents: 79% (230) healthcare professionals and 12% (61) patients and carers. After the secondary survey, the top 16 questions were brought to the final workshop to finalise the top 10 research questions. The top 10 questions were: What are the best outcome measures (ways of assessing the effect of the treatment) after foot and ankle surgery? What treatment is the best for Achilles tendon pain? What is the best treatment (including surgery) for tibialis posterior dysfunction (tendon on the inner side of the ankle), leading to a successful long-term outcome? Should physiotherapy be provided following foot and ankle surgery and is there an optimal amount needed to restore function after foot and ankle surgery? At what stage should a patient with ankle instability (ie, an ankle that keeps giving way) be considered for surgical treatment? How effective are steroid injections in improving pain from arthritis in the foot and ankle? What is the best surgery for bone and cartilage defects in the talus? What is better, ankle fusion or ankle replacements? What is the success of surgical lengthening of the calf muscle in improving forefoot pain? What is the best time to start weight bearing after ankle fusion/replacement surgery?ConclusionTop 10 themes included outcomes following interventions, for example, range of movement, reduction in pain, rehabilitation, which included physiotherapy to optimise post intervention outcomes, rehabilitation and condition-specific treatments. These questions will aid to guide national research into foot and ankle surgery. It will also help national funding bodies to prioritise areas of research interest to improve patient care.

No abstract