IntroductionIn light of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, protecting vulnerable groups has become a high priority. Persons at risk of severe disease, for example, those receiving immunosuppressive therapies for chronic inflammatory cdiseases (CIDs), are prioritised for vaccination. However, data concerning generation of protective antibody titres in immunosuppressed patients are scarce. Additionally, mRNA vaccines represent a new vaccine technology leading to increased insecurity especially in patients with CID.ObjectiveHere we present for the first time, data on the efficacy and safety of anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in a cohort of immunosuppressed patients as compared with healthy controls.Methods42 healthy controls and 26 patients with CID were included in this study (mean age 37.5 vs 50.5 years). Immunisations were performed according to national guidelines with mRNA vaccines. Antibody titres were assessed by ELISA before initial vaccination and 7 days after secondary vaccination. Disease activity and side effects were assessed prior to and 7 days after both vaccinations.ResultsAnti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies as well as neutralising activity could be detected in all study participants. IgG titres were significantly lower in patients as compared with controls (2053 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL ±1218 vs 2685±1102). Side effects were comparable in both groups. No severe adverse effects were observed, and no patients experienced a disease flare.ConclusionWe show that SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines lead to development of antibodies in immunosuppressed patients without considerable side effects or induction of disease flares. Despite the small size of this cohort, we were able to demonstrate the efficiency and safety of mRNA vaccines in our cohort.

BackgroundThe persistence of the SARS-CoV2 pandemic, partly due to the appearance of highly infectious variants, has made booster vaccinations necessary for vulnerable groups. Questions remain as to which cohorts require SARS-CoV2 boosters. However, there is a critical lack of data on the dynamics of vaccine responses in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases (CID) undergoing immunosuppressive/disease modifying anti-rheumatic (DMARD) treatment. Here, we present the first data regarding the decline of the vaccine-induced humoral immune responses in patients with CID.Methods23 patients with CID were monitored clinically and for anti-spike IgG and IgA levels, neutralization efficacy and antigen-specific CD4+ T cell responses over the first 6 months after SARS-CoV2 vaccination. 24 healthy individuals were included as controls.ResultsWhile anti-spike IgG-levels declined in CID patients and healthy controls, patients receiving anti-TNF treatment showed significantly greater declines at 6 months post second vaccination in IgG and especially neutralizing antibodies. IgA levels were generally lower in CID patients, particularly during anti-TNF therapy. No differences in SARS-CoV2 spike-specific CD4+ T-cell frequencies were detected.ConclusionAlthough the long-term efficacy of SARS-CoV2 vaccination in CID patients undergoing disease-modifying therapy is still not known, the pronounced declines in humoral responses towards SARS-CoV2 6 months after mRNA vaccination in the context of TNF blockade should be considered when formulating booster regimens. These patients should be considered for early booster vaccinations.

No abstract

The humoral immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) vaccination in patients with chronic inflammatory disease (CID) declines more rapidly with tumor necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α) inhibition. Furthermore, the efficacy of current vaccines against Omicron variants of concern (VOC) including BA.2 is limited. Alterations within immune cell populations, changes in IgG affinity, and the ability to neutralize a pre‐VOC strain and the BA.2 virus were investigated in these at‐risk patients. Serum levels of anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG, IgG avidity, and neutralizing antibodies (NA) were determined in anti‐TNF‐α patients ( n = 10) and controls ( n = 24 healthy individuals; n = 12 patients under other disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs, oDMARD) before and after the second and third vaccination by ELISA, immunoblot and live virus neutralization assay. SARS‐CoV‐2‐specific B‐ and T cell subsets were analysed by multicolor flow cytometry. Six months after the second vaccination, anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG levels, IgG avidity and anti‐pre‐VOC NA titres were significantly reduced in anti‐TNF‐α recipients compared to controls (healthy individuals: avidity: p ≤ 0.0001; NA: p = 0.0347; oDMARDs: avidity: p = 0.0012; NA: p = 0.0293). The number of plasma cells was increased in anti‐TNF‐α patients (Healthy individuals: p = 0.0344; oDMARDs: p = 0.0254), while the absolute number of SARS‐CoV‐2‐specific plasma cells 7 days after 2nd vaccination were comparable. Even after a third vaccination, these patients had lower anti‐BA.2 NA titres compared to both other groups. We show a reduced SARS‐CoV‐2 neutralizing capacity in patients under TNF‐α blockade. In this cohort, the plasma cell response appears to be less specific and shows stronger bystander activation. While these effects were observable after the first two vaccinations and with older VOC, the differences in responses to BA.2 were enhanced.

Psoriatic disease is a chronic, systemic immune‐mediated inflammatory disorder comprising three major domains, skin, vascular and bone/joint inflammation. It is known for a long time that psoriatic disease is associated with a number of conditions such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes (metabolic syndrome) and depression. Up to one out of five people with psoriasis show concomitant depression. In the past, this was attributed to psychological stress of suffering from a chronic condition that is often visible and itchy, leading to stigmatization and adding to a significant burden of disease. Recent data provide evidence that depression associated with psoriatic disease is linked to the specific inflammatory pattern with IL‐23, IL‐17 family cytokines, TNF, IL‐6 and IL‐8 causing neuroinflammation and subsequently depression or depressive behaviour and/or anxiety. Psoriatic disease shows a distinct pattern of immune cells (e.g. dendritic cells, Th17 cells, neutrophils), mediators (e.g. IL‐17A/F, IL‐23, TNF) and tissue‐related factors in all major domains that is different from other inflammatory dermatoses. There is a striking similarity between the inflammatory pattern in psoriatic disease and neuroinflammation that leads to depression. A number of risk factors have been identified in psoriatic disease, the most important of which are obesity and tobacco smoking. Obesity is known as a major risk factor for depression and anxiety due to its inflammatory signature. Apart from psychotherapy and anti‐depressive medication, targeted treatments for psoriasis, including TNF, IL‐17 and IL‐23 inhibitors, can improve depression/depressive symptoms. The review summarizes the current knowledge about depression as a comorbidity in psoriatic disease.