No abstract

Intermediate high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is characterised by right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and elevated circulating cardiac troponin levels despite apparent haemodynamic stability at presentation. In these patients, full-dose systemic thrombolysis reduced the risk of haemodynamic decompensation or death but increased the risk of life-threatening bleeding. Reduced-dose thrombolysis may be capable of improving safety while maintaining reperfusion efficacy. The Pulmonary Embolism International Trial (PEITHO)-3 study (EudraCT 2018-000816-96) is a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicentre, multinational trial with long-term follow-up. We will compare the efficacy and safety of a reduced-dose alteplase regimen with standard heparin anticoagulation. Patients with intermediate high-risk PE will also fulfil at least one clinical criterion of severity: systolic blood pressure ≤ 110 mmHg, respiratory rate >20 breaths/min, or history of heart failure. The primary efficacy outcome is the composite of all-cause death, haemodynamic decompensation or PE recurrence within 30 days of randomisation. Key secondary outcomes, to be included in hierarchical analysis, are fatal or GUSTO severe or life-threatening bleeding; net clinical benefit (primary efficacy outcome plus severe or life-threatening bleeding); and all-cause death, all within 30 days. All outcomes will be adjudicated by an independent committee. Further outcomes include PE-related death, haemodynamic decompensation, or stroke within 30 days; dyspnoea, functional limitation or RV dysfunction at 6 months and 2 years; and utilisation of healthcare resources within 30 days and 2 years. The study is planned to enrol 650 patients. The results are expected to have a major impact on risk-adjusted treatment of acute PE and inform guideline recommendations.

Introduction Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are associated with a better safety profile than warfarin in patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), direct factor Xa inhibitors involve a higher risk of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). We aimed to determine the risk of AUB during anticoagulation with dabigatran compared with warfarin. Methods Post-hoc analysis of the pooled RE-COVER studies and the RE-MEDY trial. Incidences of AUB, based on a defined preferred terms search for adverse events, in female patients aged 18-50 years treated with dabigatran, were compared with those in women treated with warfarin. Results Of the 2964 women included in the above-mentioned trials, 1280 women were in the relevant age category (18-50 years) and included in the current analysis. A total of 643 patients were randomized to treatment with dabigatran and 637 to treatment with warfarin. The overall rate of AUB was 8.1%, 5.9% for the women treated with dabigatran and 9.6% in those treated with warfarin, for an odds ratio for dabigatran-treated patients of 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.90; P = 0.015). In the dabigatran-treated patients, three (0.5%) suffered major bleeding (MB) vs. five (0.8%) in the warfarin-treated patients (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.15-2.72). MB or non-major relevant bleeding occurred in 30 (4.7%) patients randomized to receive dabigatran and 57 (8.9%) randomized to receive warfarin (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34-0.83). None of the bleeding events was fatal. Conclusion Dabigatran treatment was associated with a significantly (41%) lower risk of AUB than warfarin. Future studies in daily practice are needed to corroborate these findings.

Background Improved imaging techniques have increased the incidence of subsegmental pulmonary embolism (ssPE). Indirect evidence is suggesting that ssPE may represent a more benign presentation of venous thromboembolism not necessarily requiring anticoagulant treatment. However, correctly diagnosing ssPE is challenging with reported low interobserver agreement, partly due to the lack of widely accepted diagnostic criteria. Objectives We sought to derive uniform diagnostic criteria for ssPE, guided by expert consensus. Methods Based on an extensive literature review and expert opinion of a Delphi steering committee, two surveys including statements regarding diagnostic criteria and management options for ssPE were established. These surveys were conducted electronically among two panels, respectively: expert thoracic radiologists and clinical venous thromboembolism specialists. The Delphi method was used to achieve consensus after multiple survey rounds. Consensus was defined as a level of agreement >70%. Results Twenty‐nine of 40 invited radiologists (73%) and 40 of 51 clinicians (78%) participated. Following two survey rounds by the expert radiologists, consensus was achieved on 15 of 16 statements, including on the established diagnostic criteria for ssPE (96% agreement): a contrast defect in a subsegmental artery, that is, the first arterial branch division of any segmental artery independent of artery diameter, visible in at least two subsequent axial slices, using a computed tomography scanner with a desired maximum collimator width of ≤1 mm. These criteria were approved by 83% of the clinical venous thromboembolism (VTE) specialists. The clinical expert panel favored anticoagulant treatment in case of prior VTE, antiphospholipid syndrome, pregnancy, cancer, and proximal deep vein thrombosis. Conclusion The results of this analysis provide standard radiological criteria for ssPE that may be applicable in both clinical trials and practice.

No abstract