In this study we examined the impact of irrelevant distractors upon trajectories of reflexive and voluntary saccades. Observers made saccades to visual targets above and below fixation as directed by target appearance (reflexive) or by a central directional cue (voluntary) in the presence of an irrelevant distractor stimulus (a cross) whose appearance was simultaneous with target onset. We recorded saccade latency, amplitude and the magnitude of saccade curvature relative to the direct route from the start-to-end of the saccade. Previous studies of saccades curvature have used distractors to provide information about the saccade task and, as a result, have only examined trajectories of voluntary saccades. However, we have shown that both reflexive and voluntary saccades curved away from irrelevant distractors. The effect of irrelevant distractors indicates that observers do not need to attend to distractors in a voluntary fashion for distractors to modify saccade trajectories. Furthermore, it highlights an important parallel in curvature of saccades and reach trajectories, namely that both curve away from irrelevant distractors. The second important observation was that reflexive, as well as voluntary, saccades curved away from distractors. This suggests that curvature is not solely a consequence of voluntary control. These results have been considered within the context of inhibition-based theories of curvature derived from studies of saccade and manual reach trajectories.

It has been the matter of some debate why we can experience vivid dynamic illusions when looking at static pictures composed from simple black and white patterns. The impression of illusory motion is particularly strong when viewing some of the works of 'Op Artists, such as Bridget Riley's painting Fall. Explanations of the illusory motion have ranged from retinal to cortical mechanisms, and an important role has been attributed to eye movements. To assess the possible contribution of eye movements to the illusory-motion percept we studied the strength of the illusion under different viewing conditions, and analysed the gaze stability of observers viewing the Riley painting and control patterns that do not produce the illusion. Whereas the illusion was reduced, but not abolished, when watching the painting through a pinhole, which reduces the effects of accommodation, it was not perceived in flash afterimages, suggesting an important role for eye movements in generating the illusion for this image. Recordings of eye movements revealed an abundance of small involuntary saccades when looking at the Riley pattern, despite the fact that gaze was kept within the dedicated fixation region. The frequency and particular characteristics of these rapid eye movements can vary considerably between different observers, but, although there was a tendency for gaze stability to deteriorate while viewing a Riley painting, there was no significant difference in saccade frequency between the stimulus and control patterns. Theoretical considerations indicate that such small image displacements can generate patterns of motion signals in a motion-detector network, which may serve as a simple and sufficient, but not necessarily exclusive, explanation for the illusion. Why such image displacements lead to perceptual results with a group of Op Art and similar patterns, but remain invisible for other stimuli, is discussed.

Can auditory signals influence the processing of visual information? The present study examined the effects of simple auditory signals (clicks and noise bursts) whose onset was simultaneous with that of the visual target, but which provided no information about the target. It was found that such a signal enhances performance in the visual task: the accessory sound reduced response times for target identification with no cost to accuracy. The spatial location of the sound (whether central to the display or at the target location) did not modify this facilitation. Furthermore, the same pattern of facilitation was evident whether the observer fixated centrally or moved their eyes to the target. The results were not altered by changes in the contrast (and therefore visibility) of the visual stimulus or by the perceived utility of the spatial location of the sound. We speculate that the auditory signal may promote attentional 'disengagement' and that, as a result, observers are able to process the visual target sooner when sound accompanies the display relative to when visual information is presented alone.

In a series of experiments, we examined the change in saccade trajectories observed when distractors are presented at non-target locations. The primary aim of the experiments was to examine multisensory interaction effects between the visual, auditory and somatosensory modalities in saccade generation. In each experiment observers made saccades to visual targets above and below fixation in the presence of visual, auditory or tactile stimuli to the left or right of fixation. In experiment 1 distractor location indicated which of two stimuli was the target for the saccade. Saccade trajectories showed strong leftward curvature following right-side distractors and showed rightward curvature following left-side distractors. The largest effects on trajectories were observed for visual distractors, but significant curvature was observed with auditory and somatosensory distractors. In experiment 2 saccades were made following the onset of a visual target (reflexive) or following presentation of an arrow at fixation (voluntary), and task-irrelevant crossmodal distractors were presented simultaneously with target onset. Both voluntary and reflexive saccades were found to curve away from task-irrelevant visual distractors, but auditory and somatosensory distractors did not modulate saccade trajectories. In experiment 3 task-irrelevant distractors preceded the onset of the target by 100 ms. Reflexive saccades were found to curve away from visual, auditory and somatosensory distractors, but voluntary saccades curved away from visual distractors only. The modulation of saccade trajectories by distractors from different modalities is interpreted in terms of inhibitory processes operating in neural structures involved in saccade generation. Our findings suggest that visual, auditory and somatosensory distractors can all modulate saccade trajectories. Such effects could be related to the inhibition of populations of neurons, in a common motor map, for the selection of a saccade target.

No abstract