The precise assessment of hip rotation ROM, especially hip internal rotation ROM, must be included in the examination of patients with LBP symptoms.

BackgroundBaecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire (BHPAQ) has widely been employed in clinical and laboratorial studies as a tool for measuring subjects' physical activities. But, the reliability and validity of this questionnaire have not been investigated among Persian speakers.ObjectivesTherefore, the aim of the current study was examining the reliability and validity of the Persian version of the BHPAQ in healthy Persian adults.Materials and MethodsAfter following the process of forward-backward translation, 32 subjects were invited to fill out the Persian version of the questionnaire in two independent sessions (3 - 7 days after the first session) in order to determine the reliability index. Also, the validity of the questionnaire was assessed through concurrent validity by 126 subjects (66 males and 60 females) answering both the Baecke and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).ResultsAn acceptable level of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC of work score = 0.95, sport score = 0.93, and leisure score = 0.77) was achieved for the Persian Baecke questionnaire. Correlations between Persian Baecke and IPAQ with and without the score for sitting position were found to be 0.19 and 0.36, respectively.ConclusionsThe Persian version of the BHPAQ is a reliable and valid instrument that can be used to measure the level of habitual functional activities in Persian-speaking subjects.

1. The data of the current study suggests that lumbopelvic movement patterns in different groups of LBP patients in regard to their specific activities may vary. 2. LBP people with rotational demand sports activities have a greater tendency of pelvic rotation motion during the AHIR.

Amputees who used single axis prosthesis achieved appropriate adaptation to their prosthesis device.

The asymmetrical loading applied to legs was proposed as a risk factor for low back pain development. However, this proposed mechanical risk factor was not investigated in the athletes with LBP engaged in rotational demand activities. The aim of the present study was to examine symmetry of weight-bearing in patients with rotational demand activities compared to that in healthy people during gait. In total, 35 subjects, 15 males with LBP and 20 males without LBP, participated in the study. The participants were asked to walk 12 trials in gait lab. Forces applied to legs were recorded by a force plate. Then, the peaks of anteroposterior, mediolateral, and vertical forces were measured. Next, the asymmetrical loads applied to the legs were calculated. The results of our study demonstrated that people with LBP exhibit more asymmetry of vertical peak forces in heel strike and mid-stance. They also exhibited more asymmetry of loading in the anterior direction. But the mean values of ASI of mediolateral and posterior forces in these participants were not significantly different compared to those in the control group. It can be concluded that, in comparison to the healthy subjects, patients with LBP walk with a greater magnitude of asymmetrical weight-bearing at a comfortable speed.

1. A greater lumbopelvic rotation ROM during the PHER existed in LBP patients who regularly participated in RDA. 2. Different groups of patients with LBP who engage in different specific activities may have a specific lumbopelvic movement pattern impairment. Therefore, each group of LBP patients in regard to their specific activities may need a different, specific plan of treatment.

Increased lumbopelvic motion during limb movements' tests was reported in low back pain (LBP) patients with and without rotational demand activities. The aim of this study was to compare lumbopelvic movement pattern between two groups of LBP patients with and without rotational demand activity during active hip external rotation test. Thirty nine patients with non-specific chronic LBP participated in this study. Patients were allocated into two groups, in first group 15 subjects (mean age ¼ 31:5 years) with rotational demand activities such as tennis, squash and golf, and in second group 24 subjects (mean age ¼ 31:2) without rotational demand activities participated in current study. Kinematic data from lumbopelvic-hip region during active hip external rotation test (AHER) were collected by a 3D motion analysis system. Variables including range of motion (ROM) of hip external rotation, pelvic rotation, pelvic rotation during first half of hip rotation motion and timing of pelvic-hip movement were calculated by MATLAB software for both sides and after this, independent t-test was used to compare the variables between 2 groups of study. The mean lumbopelvic rotation in lower extremities tests for both sides and lumbopelvic rotation in the dominant limb external J. Mech. Med. Biol. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com by UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND on 06/21/16. For personal use only. rotation test in the patients with rotational demand activities were significantly more than other group (p < 0:05). During dominant lower limb movement test, pelvic rotation in first half of movement and in patients with rotational activities was greater than in non-rotational group but hip rotation was statistically lesser than other group (p < 0:05). Other variables between the two groups were not significantly different (p > 0:05). The result of the study suggest that LBP patients who have rotational demand sports activities may move their lumbopelvic region in a greater magnitude during the AHER test than LBP people without rotational demand activities. Therefore, Lumbopelvic movement pattern in the different groups of the patients with LBP and based on their specific activities is different with each other.

Standing stability is controlled by musculoskeletal and neurological systems. Various methods have been used to evaluate the performance of subjects during standing including linear and non-linear methods. It is not clear which method has more sensitivity to represent the stability of subjects with various musculoskeletal disorders. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the stability of the subjects with various musculoskeletal disorders by use of linear and non-linear methods. About 65 subjects including, normal and those with flatfoot, Parkinson and Perthes were recruited into this study. A Kistler forceplate was used to evaluate the stability. The difference between the linear (center of pressure excursion, velocity and path length) and non-linear (approximate entropy) parameters were evaluated using the independent t-test. The mean values of stability parameters (linear and non-linear) of flat arch subjects were more than that of normal subjects. Although there was no difference between linear stability parameters of normal and those with Parkinson disease, their mean value of non-linear parameter was less than that of normal subject (p-< 0.05). The results of stability analysis based on both linear and non-linear approaches showed that the subjects with Perthes disease were more unstable than normal subjects. It seems that non-linear method is more sensitive to represent the difference between stability of subjects with flatfoot, Parkinson and Perthes. However, if a combination of various parameters, based on linear method, is used to measure stability, the difference between stability can be enhanced. Depending on the disease condition increasing and decreasing the value of approximate entropy represent the unstability situations.