No abstract

No abstract

Objective Many large-sample prospective randomized clinical trials investigating advanced gastric cancer (AGC) have confirmed the survival advantages of first-line, second-line, or third-line chemotherapy compared with their respective control groups. However, due to the ethical concerns of prospective clinical trials, it is impossible to conduct a randomized comparative study of patients who do not receive chemotherapy and those who receive a second-line or above chemotherapy. Few research reports have addressed the relationship between the number of chemotherapy lines and overall survival (OS) in patients with AGC. In the present study, we analyzed the impact of the number of chemotherapy lines on OS in AGC patients using real-world data. Patients and Methods This study collected the medical records of patients with AGC diagnosed at Shandong Cancer Hospital from December 2007 to December 2017. According to the treatment received, AGC patients were divided into groups that did not receive chemotherapy, those who received only 1 line, 2 lines, or 3 lines and above. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to assess patient survival. Results A total of 596 AGC patients were included in this study. The following patients were enrolled: 0 lines (did not receive chemotherapy), 77 (12.9%); 1 line, 235 (39.4%) patients; 2 lines, 185 (31.1%) patients; and ≥3 lines 99 (16.6%) patients. OS was significantly correlated with the number of chemotherapy lines (P<0.001), with a median OS from diagnosis of 3.3, 8.6, 15.6, and 21.0 months for patients receiving 0, 1, 2, ≥3 lines of chemotherapy, respectively. Conclusion This study showed that the more chemotherapy lines AGC patients received, the longer the OS. This study not only confirmed the impact of chemotherapy lines on OS but it also supplements the results of prospective clinical trials that cannot be completed due to the ethical implications.

Purpose Gastric cancer (GC) is the second most lethal cancer globally and is associated with poor prognosis. Fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs) can regulate biological properties of carcinoma cells. FABP5 is overexpressed in many types of cancers; however, the role and mechanisms of action of FABP5 in GC remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical and biological functions of FABP5 in GC. Materials and Methods We assessed FABP5 expression using immunohistochemical analysis in 79 patients with GC and evaluated its biological functions following in vitro and in vivo ectopic expression. FABP5 targets relevant to GC progression were determined using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Results Elevated FABP5 expression was closely associated with poor outcomes, and ectopic expression of FABP5 promoted proliferation, invasion, migration, and carcinogenicity of GC cells, thus suggesting its potential tumor-promoting role in GC. Additionally, RNA-seq analysis indicated that FABP5 activates immune-related pathways, including cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction pathways, interleukin-17 signaling, and tumor necrosis factor signaling, suggesting an important rationale for the possible development of therapies that combine FABP5-targeted drugs with immunotherapeutics. Conclusions These findings highlight the biological mechanisms and clinical implications of FABP5 in GC and suggest its potential as an adverse prognostic factor and/or therapeutic target.