The objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of intravenous busulfan in pediatric patients and provide dosing recommendations. Twenty-four pediatric patients were treated with intravenous busulfan, 1.0 or 0.8 mg/kg for ages < or = 4 years or > 4 years, respectively, 4 times a day for 4 days. Dense PK sampling was performed. Body weight, age, gender, and body surface area were explored for effects on PK, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to assess different dosing regimens. The PK of intravenous busulfan was described by a 1-compartment model with clearance of 4.04 L/h/20 kg and volume of distribution of 12.8 L/20 kg. Simulations indicated that the mg/kg and mg/m2 regimens were similar and achieved the desired target exposure in approximately 60% of patients. This model suggests that patients < or = 12 kg should be dosed at 1.1 mg/kg and those > 12 kg dosed at 0.8 mg/kg. Therapeutic drug monitoring and dose adjustment will further improve therapeutic targeting.

The value of quantitative thinking in drug development and regulatory review is increasingly being appreciated. Modeling and simulation of data pertaining to pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and disease progression is often referred to as the pharmacometrics analyses. The objective of the current report is to assess the role of pharmacometrics at the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in making drug approval and labeling decisions. The New Drug Applications (NDAs) submitted between 2000 and 2004 to the Cardio-renal, Oncology, and Neuropharmacology drug products divisions were surveyed. For those NDA reviews that included a pharmacometrics consultation, the clinical pharmacology scientists ranked the impact on the regulatory decision(s). Of about a total of 244 NDAs, 42 included a pharmacometrics component. Review of NDAs involved independent, quantitative evaluation by FDA pharmacometricians, even when such analysis was not conducted by the sponsor. Pharmacometric analyses were pivotal in regulatory decision making in more than half of the 42 NDAs. Of the 14 reviews that were pivotal to approval related decisions, 5 identified the need for additional trials, whereas 6 reduced the burden of conducting additional trials. Collaboration among the FDA clinical pharmacology, medical, and statistical reviewers and effective communication with the sponsors was critical for the impact to occur. The survey and the case studies emphasize the need for early interaction between the FDA and sponsors to plan the development more efficiently by appreciating the regulatory expectations better.

Literature and experimental data relevant to waiver of in vivo bioequivalence (BE) testing for the approval of immediate-release solid oral dosage forms containing amoxicillin trihydrate are reviewed. Solubility and permeability characteristics according to the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), therapeutic uses, therapeutic index, excipient interactions, as well as dissolution and BE and bioavailability studies were taken into consideration. Solubility and permeability studies indicate that amoxicillin doses up to 875 mg belong to BCS class I, whereas 1000 mg belongs to BCS class II and doses of more than 1000 mg belong to BCS class IV. Considering all aspects, the biowaiver procedure can be recommended for solid oral products of amoxicillin trihydrate immediate-release preparations containing amoxicillin as the single active pharmaceutical ingredient at dose strengths of 875 mg or less, provided (a) only the excipients listed in this monograph are used, and only in their usual amounts, (b) the biowaiver study is performed according to the World Health Organization-, U.S. Food and Drug Administration-, or European Medicines Agency-recommended method using the innovator as the comparator, and (c) results comply with criteria for "very rapidly dissolving" or "similarly rapidly dissolving." Products containing other excipients and those containing more than 875 mg amoxicillin per unit should be subjected to an in vivo BE study.

Irinotecan, an anticancer drug, is associated with severe and potentially fatal diarrhea and neutropenia. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the role of SN-38 exposure, the active metabolite of irinotecan, UGT1A1 genotypes, and baseline bilirubin on the maximum decrease (nadir) in absolute neutrophil counts following irinotecan. This analysis extended the work of a previous study that examined the effect of UGT1A1 genotypes on the incidence of severe neutropenia in 86 advanced cancer patients following irinotecan treatment. Regression analysis showed that the absolute neutrophil count nadir depended on SN-38 exposure (AUC) and UGT1A1*28 homozygous 7/7 genotype. An increased SN-38 AUC and the 7/7 genotype were significantly associated with a lower absolute neutrophil count nadir (R2 = .49). An alternate model suggested that higher baseline bilirubin and the 7/7 genotype were also significantly associated with a lower absolute neutrophil count nadir, although with a lower coefficient of determination (R2 = .31). Based on these findings and other reports, the irinotecan label was modified to indicate the role of UGT1A1*28 polymorphism in the metabolism of irinotecan and the associated increased risk of severe neutropenia. The label modifications also included recommendations for lower starting doses of irinotecan in patients homozygous for the UGT1A1*28 (7/7) polymorphism.

1. We quantitated the effect of biliary diversion on cyclosporin (CyA) absorption in liver transplant patients. Multiple blood samples were obtained over one dosing interval following oral CyA administration in eight liver transplant patients before and after T‐tube clamping. 2. Cyclosporin concentrations were measured by a high pressure liquid chromatographic method. 3. The mean (+/‐ s.d.) dose‐normalized area under the blood concentration vs time curve (AUC) over a dosing interval was 5.23 (+/‐ 3.22) ng ml‐1 h during the pre clamping period and 15.79 +/‐ 7.92 ng ml‐1 h during the post clamping period. A significant (P less than 0.05) increase (276%) in the dose normalized AUC was observed following the T‐tube clamping. 4. Analysis of bile revealed less than 1 mg (less than 1% of dose) of unchanged CyA to be eliminated in bile over 12 h. Therefore the increased CyA AUC/dose following T‐tube ligation cannot be explained by enterohepatic recirculation. 5. Increased bile flow secondary to clamping of the T‐ tube most likely increased the absorption of CyA. Increase in CyA absorption may be due to a bile mediated increase in CyA solubility or gastrointestinal membrane permeability, or increased residence time at the site of absorption. 6. Independent of the mechanism involved, our results indicate that adjustments in CyA dosage must be made whenever external bile diversion is instituted or discontinued.

No abstract

A critical issue in labeling is to succinctly communicate, in a manner that is readily understandable and actionable, changes in systemic exposure that affect drug dosing. Current practices in labeling make it difficult for prescribers to locate the most important information influencing their dosing decisions. In this report, we propose the use of forest plots for communicating the pharmacokinetic consequences of intrinsic and extrinsic factors in a concise and readily interpretable manner. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2011) 90 3, 471–474. doi:

The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that rapidly dissolving immediate-release (IR) solid oral products containing a highly soluble and highly permeable drug [biopharmaceutical classification system (BCS) class I] are bioequivalent under fed conditions. Metoprolol and propranolol (BCS class I) as well as hydrochlorothiazide (BCS class III) were selected as model drugs. The relative bioavailability of two FDA approved (Orange Book AB rating) solid oral dosage forms of metoprolol and propranolol/hydrochlorothiazide (combination tablets) was evaluated in human volunteers under fed conditions using a two-way crossover design. Equal numbers of male and female volunteers were recruited, and racial and/or ethnic minorities were not excluded. The plasma concentrations of metoprolol, propranolol, and hydrochlorothiazide were determined using validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods. Eighteen subjects completed the metoprolol study while 17 subjects completed the propranolol/hydrochlorothiazide combination tablet study. In the metoprolol study, the 90% confidence intervals of Cmax and AUC(inf) were 98-118% and 92-115%, respectively. For propranolol, the 90% confidence intervals of Cmax and AUC(inf) were 91-121% and 89-117%, and for hydrochlorothiazide, the 90% confidence intervals for Cmax and AUC(inf) were 96-107% and 97-106%, respectively. These study results appear to support the hypothesis that rapidly dissolving IR solid oral products containing a BCS class I drug are likely to be bioequivalent under fed conditions. In addition, BCS class III drugs may have the potential to be bioequivalent under fed conditions.