This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Purpose This study aimed to assess the frequency of sleep and mood disturbances, and their association with COVID-like symptoms in healthcare workers (HCWs) with and without positive Coronavirus RT-PCR in a corona referral center. Methods This study was a cross-sectional, anonymous survey of adult HCWs. Data collection was performed in May and June 2020, while governmental restrictions were in place. The participants completed the forms including six separate parts: personal and occupational information, Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient's Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and COVID-like symptoms and Coronavirus RT-PCR status. Results Among the 372 HCW participants, 245 (66%) were women and mean age was 34.5 ± 7.1 years (age range 23 to 58). The mean scores of all questionnaires except ISI were significantly higher in the HCWs with positive Coronavirus RT-PCR than another group (

No abstract

Background: Finding effective outpatient treatments to prevent COVID-19 progression and hospitalization is necessary and is helpful in managing limited hospital resources. Repurposing previously existing treatments is highly desirable. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of Favipiravir in the prevention of hospitalization in symptomatic COVID-19 patients who were not eligible for hospitalization. Methods: This study was a triple-blind randomized controlled trial conducted between 5 December 2020 and 31 March 2021 in three outpatient centers in Isfahan, Iran. Patients in the intervention group received Favipiravir 1600 mg daily for five days, and the control group received a placebo. Our primary outcome was the proportion of hospitalized participants from day 0 to day 28. The outcome was assessed on days 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 through phone calls. Results: Seventy-seven patients were randomly allocated to Favipiravir and placebo groups. There was no significant difference between groups considering baseline characteristics. During the study period, 10.5% of patients in the Favipiravir group and 5.1% of patients in the placebo group were hospitalized, but there was no significant difference between them (p-value = 0.3). No adverse event was reported in the treatment group. Conclusions: Our study shows that Favipiravir did not reduce the hospitalization rate of mild to moderate COVID-19 patients in outpatient settings.

Background:Myelosuppression is one of the frequent side effects of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and pegylated G-CSF are used for the prevention of neutropenia after chemotherapy. Pegylated G-CSF has longer half-life of action and can be used as a single dose in comparison to G-CSF. The aim of this study is to compare the grade of cytopenia and side effects between G-CSF and biosimilar pegylated G-CSF in breast cancer patients treated with dose-dense chemotherapy.Materials and Methods:In the cross-over clinical trial study, 24 women with breast cancer were randomly divided into two groups and treated with dose-dense chemotherapy. The first group was treated with single dose of 6 mg biosimilar pegylated G-CSF 24 h after the first course of chemotherapy and the second course was followed by 300 μg daily injection of G-CSF for 6 days. The chemotherapy regimen was combination of doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2. The second group was treated with G-CSF after the first course and pegylated G-CSF after the second course. Cell blood count (CBC) and side effects were evaluated 1 and 2 weeks after both courses of chemotherapy.Results:In this study, no significant carryover effect and treatment effect about the CBC parameters was found between pegylated G-CSF and G-CSF. Patients who were treated with biosimilar pegylated G-CSF had significantly higher side effects such as bone pain (P = 0.09) and gastrointestinal effects (P = 0.005) in comparison to G-CSF.Conclusion:G-CSF and biosimilar pegylated G-CSF are effective in reducing cytopenia in breast cancer patients treated with dose-dense chemotherapy, but side effects induced by pegylated G-CSF (Pegagen) are higher.