Background: We compared retrospectively the results of the patients who underwent hemihepatectomy through anterior approach (AHH) with those undergoing conventional hemihepatectomy (HH). Patients and Methods: In 119 patients hemihepatectomy was done, 52 of them were anterior approaches. We used this technique if the tumor size was large or if the tumor seemed to be fragile, and thus a liver mobilization would be very dangerous. We started the operation with dissecting parenchyma from the anterior surface toward hilus without preparation of the hilus. Resection of the liver was performed with the help of CUSA dissector. Results: No patient died following AHH. Two re-operations were performed in the HH group, and 2 patients died. The operation time was not significantly different in both groups. The need for blood transfusion was much less during AHH. The average nursing days were also similar in both groups. However, in those cases in which the operations were performed because of liver malignancies, there were no differences in the survival rate after 32-month follow-up between both groups. Conclusions: AHH can be performed safely. The blood consumption during AHH is significantly lower than during HH. The median survival rate was similar in both groups. Our team suggest the anterior approach for liver resection in those cases when the hilar structures and the hepatic veins cannot be isolated easily.
A paraesophageal hernia was diagnosed in a 67-year-old female patient suffering from epigastric pain and gastroesophageal reflux disease. The patient underwent laparoscopy. Beside the paraesophageal hernia, a Morgagni hernia was also observed, with a significant part of the omentum herniated in the sac. A 360-degree Nissen fundoplication was performed, the Morgagni hernia sac was not resected, and its closure was performed with interrupted sutures. No complications were observed in the postoperative period and on one-year follow-up the patient was free of symptoms.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.