Objective To investigate the effects of COVID‐19 pandemic on patients' perceptions of hardship in obtaining their drugs and if this pandemic and the social restrictions in response to that has resulted in any changes in their seizure control status. We also investigated factors potentially associated with the perceptions of difficulty in obtaining their drugs (eg, polytherapy vs monotherapy, taking imported drugs, and seizure status worsening). Methods We surveyed a random sample of patients with epilepsy, who were registered in our database at Shiraz Epilepsy Center, Iran, on their perceptions on two issues: (a) What has been your experience on obtaining your antiseizure medications in the past 4 weeks (compared to before)? (b) Have you experienced any changes in your seizure control status in the past 4 weeks? Results We included 100 patients (53 male and 47 female patients). In response to the question “Have you had any difficulties in the past 4 weeks to obtain your drugs?,” 31 people (31%) expressed hardship obtaining their drugs. In response to the question “How has been your seizure control status compared with before?,” six people (6%) expressed worsening of their seizure control status in the past 4 weeks. None of the patients reported symptoms of coronavirus infection. Conclusion About one‐third of patients with epilepsy expressed significant hardship obtaining their drugs after the intensification of the COVID‐19 outbreak in Iran. The current COVID‐19 pandemic could be considered as a major shock to a nation that has already been under significant pressure (ie, Iran).

Background Cardiovascular disease in particular acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is remained one of the most cause of morbidity and mortality, annually. Considering inflammatory pathway of atherosclerosis, colchicine as an anti-inflammatory drug is introduced to be effective in pathogenesis, prognosis and mortality rate of these patients. So in order to find out the effects of this drug we conducted this trial to know whether it reduces major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in ACS patients or not. Methods In a prospective randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial, we enrolled ACS patients (40–70 years) with recent ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or NSTE-ACS diagnosed by coronary angiography and managed with either medical therapy or percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients were assigned to two groups either receiving colchicine 0.5 mg daily or placebo for 6 months. Both groups simultaneously received standard medical therapy as accessible guidelines. MACE occurrence consists of decompensated heart failure, ACS, stroke and survival rate compared between two groups. Results A total of 249 patients were recruited between October 2019-March 2020 with mean age of 56.89 ± 7.54, 69.5% males; 120 assigned to the colchicine group and 129 assigned to the placebo group. Over the 6 months’ period, 36 MACE occurred that were 8 events in the colchicine group compared with 28 events in the placebo group experiencing the event (P = 0.001). All of four deaths in the colchicine group and two in the placebo group were due to cardiovascular events. Evaluating adverse effects, gastrointestinal symptom was the most with the rate of 15 (12.5%) in the colchicine group and 3 (2.5%) in the controls. (P = 0.002). Conclusion The addition of colchicine to standard medical therapy in ACS patients significantly reduces MACE occurrence and improves survival rate over the time.

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

No abstract

Background SYNTAX score is one of the risk assessment systems to predict cardiac events in acute coronary syndrome patients. Despite the large number of SYNTAX score benefits, invasive methods such as coronary angiography are necessary to perform the scoring. We hypothesized that ECG parameters could predict the SYNTAX score in unstable angina patients. Methods During the retrospective cohort study, a total number of 876 patients were diagnosed with unstable angina. After applying the exclusion criteria, 600 patients were divided into tertiles based on the SYNTAX scores as low (0–22), intermediate (23–32), and high (≥ 33). The association between ECG parameters and SYNTAX score was investigated. Results The study included 65% men and 35% women with a mean age of 62.4 ± 9.97 years. The delayed transition zone of QRS complex, ST-depression in inferior-lateral territories or/and in all three territories, and T-wave inversion in lateral territory were significant (p < 0.05) independent predictors of intermediate SYNTAX score. High SYNTAX score was predicted by the presence of prolonged P wave duration, ST-depression in lateral territory or/and anterior-lateral territories, ST-elevation in aVR–III leads or/and aVR–III–V1 leads. Among those, all three territories ST-depression (AUC: 0.611, sensitivity: 75%, specificity: 51%) and aVR + III ST-elevation (AUC: 0.672, sensitivity: 50.12%, specificity: 80.50%) were the most accurate parameters to predict intermediate and high SYNTAX scores, respectively. Conclusion The present study demonstrates that accompanying the STE in the right side leads (aVR, III, V1) with ST-depression in other leads indicates the patients with high SYNTAX score; meanwhile, diffuse ST-depression without ST-elevation is a marker for intermediate SYNTAX score in unstable angina patients and can be applied for early risk stratification and intervention.

This study aimed to investigate the association between regional body fat distribution and the prevalence of Diabetes mellitus (DM) in adult populations using machine learning. We applied machine learning methods to data from a cohort study to analyze the relationship between fat in different body areas and diabetes. All measurement was done by "Tanita Segmental Body Composition Analyzer BC-418 MA Tanita Corp, Japan". The correlation between the used parameters and DM was measured using some machine learning algorithms i.e. SVM, SGD, KNN, MLP, Adaboost and EDINet. A total of 4661 participants were included. The top features that reported higher importance in classification models were age, fat mass, and percentages in legs, arms, and trunk area. Fat-free mass in the legs, arm, and trunk area was reversely associated with diabetes. Our proposed method significantly outperformed the others. It has the best performances in Accuracy, Precision, Recall-0, Recall-1, and F1-score, which were 93.57, 93.67, 96.11, 74.55 and 93.62, respectively. Our machine learning models showed that regional body fat could have specific impacts on diabetes based on the location of the fat accumulation. The most predictor values of diabetes were age, fat mass, and percentages in arms, legs, and trunk area. Further studies on different ages, gender, ethnic groups, and races are recommended.

Functional seizures (FS) or psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are characterized by paroxysmal and self-limited events that semiologically may resemble epileptic seizures, but without ictal epileptiform discharges; they are considered as psychological problems (Asadi-Pooya et al., 2020). While there is no universally accepted terminology for this common condition, "functional seizures" meets more of the criteria proposed for an acceptable label than other popular terms in the field (e.g., PNES). Hence, we have adopted "functional seizures" terminology in the current paper (Asadi-Pooya, Brigo, et al., 2020).

Opium is one of the most abused substances in the Middle East. The effects of opium use on coronary artery disease (CAD) are a matter of debate. This study aimed to assess the association between opium use and angiographic findings as well as the complexity of CAD in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) diagnosis. In this case–control study, all patients admitted for coronary angiography from 2019 to 2020 were evaluated. After applying the eligibility criteria, they were categorized into two groups opium and non-opium based on their history of opium use. Both groups were matched regarding the demographic features. The prevalence, location, and severity of obstruction of the vessels were compared between the non-opium and opium groups. The SYNTAX score was also calculated and compared between the two groups. The scores ≤ 22 are considered low risk and the higher scores are a non-low risk. P value < 0.05 is considered significant. A total of 170 patients with a mean age of 61.59 ± 9.07 years were finally enrolled in our study. Regarding the severity of vascular involvement, there was a significant difference between the non-opium and opium groups in LAD (P = 0.025), and PLV (P = 0.018) vessels. From the location points of view of obstructive coronary artery involved segments, only in the PDA (P = 0.006), and LCX (P = 0.004) vessels, a significant difference was observed. Moreover, 47.1% of opium and 30.6% of non-opium use group were in the non-low risk SYNTAX score classification which is a statistically significant difference between these two groups (P value = 0.048). Opium, as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, can have specific effects on angiographic findings in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Likewise, the complexity of CAD in opium users who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention is significantly higher.