Patients treated within an integrated primary care behavioral health service demonstrate significant improvements in clinical status, even those with the most severe levels of distress at baseline.

The primary aim of the current study was to obtain information about the longitudinal clinical functioning of primary care patients who had received care from behavioral health consultants (BHCs) integrated into a large family medicine clinic. Global mental health functioning was measured with the 20-item self-report Behavioral Health Measure (BHM), which was completed by patients at all appointments with the BHC. The BHM was then mailed to 664 patients 1.5 to 3 years after receipt of intervention from BHCs in primary care, of which 70 (10.5%) were completed and returned (62.9% female; mean age 43.1 ± 12.7 years; 48.6% Caucasian, 12.9% African American, 21.4% Hispanic/Latino, 2.9% Asian/Pacific Islander, 10.0% Other, 4.3% no response). Mixed effects modeling revealed that patients improved from their first to last BHC appointment, with gains being maintained an average of 2 years after intervention. Patterns of results remained significant even when accounting for the receipt of additional mental health treatment subsequent to BHC intervention. Findings suggest that clinical gains achieved by this subset of primary care patients that were associated with brief BHC intervention were maintained approximately 2 years after the final appointment.

The present findings are in harmony with the notion that the participants with TBI studied presented with impairments of both micro- and macrolinguistic processes involved with the organization of semantic information in discourse. Clinical implications are discussed.

The current study investigated therapeutic alliance and clinical improvement within an integrated primary care behavioral health model. Participants included 542 primary care patients seen in two large family medicine clinics. Mental health symptoms and functioning were assessed using the 20-item Behavioral Health Measure (Kopta & Lowery, 2002) at the beginning of each patient appointment. Therapeutic alliance was measured with the Therapeutic Bond Scale (CelestHealth Solutions, 2008) following an initial appointment with one of 22 behavioral health consultants (BHCs). Primary care patients rated their therapeutic alliance following a first appointment with a BHC as statistically stronger than alliance ratings from a previously reported sample of outpatient psychotherapy patients after the second, third, and fourth psychotherapy sessions (Kopta, Saunders, Lutz, Kadison, & Hirsch, 2009). Results of a bootstrapped linear regression analysis indicated that therapeutic alliance assessed after the first primary care behavioral health appointment was not associated with eventual clinical change in mental health symptoms and functioning. A strong therapeutic alliance was able to be formed in a primary care behavioral health modality. This exceeded the magnitude found in outpatient psychotherapy alliance ratings. Early therapeutic alliance was unrelated to overall clinical improvement in primary care.

A strong therapeutic alliance is considered to be an essential factor for the effective assessment and management of suicidal patients; however, to date this has received little empirical attention. The current study evaluated the association of future change in suicidal ideation with therapeutic alliance during first appointments with primary care behavioral health consultants. The Behavioral Health Measure (BHM; Kopta & Lowery, 2002 ) and Therapeutic Bond Scale (TBS; CelestHealth Solutions, 2006) were completed by 497 primary care patients who kept 2 to 8 appointments with the integrated behavioral health consultant. Results indicated that suicidal ideation generally improved over the course of several behavioral health appointments and that therapeutic alliance was rated very high by patients. Therapeutic alliance during the first appointment was not associated with eventual change in suicidal ideation.