Collaborative governance is intended to solve complex problems and promote democratic outcomes by connecting ground-level stakeholders with government. In order for these goals to be met, however, participants must have meaningful influence and opportunities for voice. Using national survey data from Continuums of Care (CoCs) mandated by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, this article investigates what structural characteristics of collaborative governance networks are related to promoting stakeholder inclusion and voice through policy advocacy involvement. Specifically, it investigates which network characteristics are associated with (1) the frequency of advocacy involvement by the network, (2) providers' engagement in and influence over that advocacy, and (3) the CoC having stronger relationships with policy makers. Findings show significant relationships between greater network capacity and network advocacy, and between network governance structure and provider engagement and influence in that advocacy. Networks have stronger relationships with policy makers when providers are more engaged, providers have more influence, network capacity is higher, and direct advocacy tactics are used.
Evidence for Practice• To meet the accountability and democratic goals of collaborative governance, networks should promote stakeholder inclusion and voice; advocacy is one way to do that. • Participant engagement and influence in advocacy may be depressed in networks that are governed by a network administrative organization; these groups may need to take steps to ensure that providers stay involved. • Increasing provider engagement and influence in advocacy is associated with the network having stronger relationships with key decision makers, which, in turn, may help collaborative governance networks more effectively fulfill their purpose and improve service delivery systems. • To promote strong relationships with policy makers, collaborative governance networks should focus on increasing direct advocacy tactics. • Smaller collaborative governance networks and those that are located in rural regions often have less strong relationships with decision makers, so their advocacy efforts may benefit from these changes the most.
For hourly workers, schedule predictability often depends on how far in advance schedules are posted. This article presents results from a process evaluation of an intervention to increase advance schedule notice in hourly retail jobs. The authors open up the black box of implementation to understand managers’ experiences posting schedules further in advance and employees’ ability to anticipate working time. Although schedules were posted further in advance in treatment than control stores, the intervention did not improve schedule anticipation. The findings demonstrate the value of attending to the “dual agenda” of assessing workplace interventions from the perspective of both employers and employees.
To reduce service gaps and better serve the homeless, CoCs should consider taking steps to improve networking, particularly when advocacy is out of reach, and cultivate local government investment and support.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.