Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide a historical overview of compassionate release policies in the USA and describe how these policies have been used during the COVID-19 pandemic. The authors then describe how these programs have been shaped by COVID-19 and could be reimagined to address the structural conditions that make prisons potentially life limiting for older adults and those with chronic illness. Design/methodology/approach This paper is primarily descriptive, offering an overview of the history of compassionate release policies before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The authors augmented this description by surveying state Departments of Corrections about their utilization of compassionate release during 2019 and 2020. The findings from this survey were combined with data collected via Freedom of Information Act Requests sent to state Departments of Corrections about the same topic. Findings The findings demonstrate that while the US federal prison system saw a multifold increase in the number of individuals released under compassionate release policies in 2020 compared to 2019, most US states had modest change, with many states maintaining the same number, or even fewer, releases in 2020 compared with 2019. Originality/value This paper provides both new data and new insight into compassionate release utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic and offers new possibilities for how compassionate release might be considered in the future.
Background Thalassemia is a common inherited hemoglobin disorder in Southeast Asia. Severe thalassemia can lead to significant morbidity for patients and economic strain for under-resourced health systems. Thailand’s thalassemia prevention and control program has successfully utilized prenatal screening and diagnosis to reduce the incidence of severe thalassemia in Thai populations, but migrant populations are excluded despite having high thalassemia prevalence. We sought to identify key barriers to and facilitators of thalassemia screening and to develop tailored recommendations for providing migrants with access to thalassemia prevention and control. Methods We conducted 28 in-depth interviews and 4 focus group discussions (FGDs) in Chonburi, Thailand with Myanmar and Cambodian migrants, Thai healthcare providers, Thai parents of children affected by thalassemia, and migrant agents. Results Participant narratives revealed that migrants’ lack of knowledge about the prevalence, manifestations, severity, and inherited nature of thalassemia led to misconceptions, fear, or indifference toward thalassemia and screening. Negative perceptions of pregnancy termination were based in religious beliefs but compounded by other sociocultural factors, presenting a key obstacle to migrant uptake of prenatal screening. Additionally, structural barriers included legal status, competing work demands, lack of health insurance, and language barriers. Participants recommended delivering public thalassemia education in migrants’ native languages, implementing carrier screening, and offering thalassemia screening in convenient settings. Conclusions An effective thalassemia prevention and control program should offer migrants targeted thalassemia education and outreach, universal coverage for thalassemia screening and prenatal care, and options for carrier screening, providing a comprehensive strategy for reducing the incidence of severe thalassemia in Thailand and establishing an inclusive model for regional thalassemia prevention and control.
BACKGROUND: Severe thalassemia is common in Southeast Asia (SEA) and can lead to transfusion dependent anemia, growth retardation, and perinatal death. Prevention and control of thalassemia can be approached either preconceptionally (through carrier screening, reproductive planning, or preimplantation diagnosis) or antenatally (through prenatal screening and diagnosis and termination of pregnancy). Thailand's national thalassemia program focuses on antenatal interventions, provided free to citizens. However, there is a growing population of migrant workers from neighboring countries who face barriers to healthcare and likely have varied beliefs towards pregnancy termination. We conducted a mixed-methods study using survey, interview, and focus group data to identify key barriers to and optimal strategies for thalassemia screening in migrant communities in Thailand. METHODS: Myanmar and Cambodian migrant workers and agents, Thai healthcare providers, and Thai adults (aged 18-49 years) at Laem Chabang Hospital (Chonburi, Thailand) participated in a knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) survey, interviews, and focus groups. All sessions were conducted in Thai or English, audio recorded, transcribed and translated into English, and analyzed thematically using MAXQDA. Codes were developed iteratively and used to answer key explanatory questions arising from the KAP survey. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from Mahidol and Duke Universities. RESULTS: Both quantitative and qualitative data showed dramatically lower thalassemia awareness in migrants vs Thai (Table 1). Furthermore, providers perceived migrants to be disinterested in thalassemia screening, though migrant narratives illustrated significant language barriers, economic barriers, lack of health literacy, and competing social stressors - all of which may contribute to perceived indifference towards thalassemia screening. Both Thai and migrants had misconceptions about thalassemia, believing it to be contagious and sexually transmitted, or equating thalassemia carrier status with disease and vice versa (Table 1). These misconceptions may contribute to the stigmatization and isolation of individuals with thalassemia and disincentivize carrier screening for fear of discrimination. Participants supported thalassemia prevention and identified antenatal care (ANC) as the main access point for thalassemia education, screening, and prevention. However, they described key limitations of this antenatal approach, including the inability to offer termination in pregnancies presenting late to ANC; couples' hesitation to terminate; cost of prenatal testing (for migrants); and reliance on male partners to present for prenatal testing. In addition, migrants expressed more negative attitudes towards termination of pregnancy on the survey (Table 1). Participants associated this attitude with the perception that migrants were more religious, less educated, less knowledgeable about genetic disease risk, and more eager to have children. Participants proposed a number of solutions, including targeted education, delivered in migrants' native languages through ANC or public media, and universal carrier screening as a more acceptable approach to thalassemia prevention and control in migrant communities. Recommended settings for screening include schools or universities, hospitals, and workplaces. Migrants also reported relying heavily on employers for access to healthcare. Therefore, employer engagement in thalassemia education and screening efforts is critical, though employment discrimination remains a concern. CONCLUSION: This study provides insight from a variety of stakeholders into potential barriers and strategies for thalassemia screening in SEA migrant populations. Findings highlight a profound lack of thalassemia awareness among migrants leading to apparent disinterest in thalassemia screening, misconceptions and stigma surrounding thalassemia, and negative attitudes towards termination of pregnancy. Promotion of public education and carrier screening is an optimal strategy for migrant populations in Thailand. Furthermore, this approach can be adopted regionally and cooperatively by member states of the Association of SEA Nations (ASEAN) to better address the shared public health problem of thalassemia. Disclosures Telen: Pfizer: Other: Member of a clinical trial steering committee; Novartis: Other: Member of a safety monitoring committee; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.