Background: There is currently little evidence regarding the use of medical cannabis for the treatment of intractable pain. Literature published on the subject to date has yielded mixed results concerning the efficacy of medical cannabis and has been limited by study design and regulatory issues. Objective: The objective of this study was to determine if the use of medical cannabis affects the amount of opioids and benzodiazepines used by patients on a daily basis. Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study evaluated opioid and benzodiazepine doses over a 6-month time period for patients certified to use medical cannabis for intractable pain. All available daily milligram morphine equivalents (MMEs) and daily diazepam equivalents (DEs) were calculated at baseline and at 3 and 6 months. Results: A total of 77 patients were included in the final analysis. There was a statistically significant decrease in median MME from baseline to 3 months (−32.5 mg; P = 0.013) and 6 months (−39.1 mg; P = 0.001). Additionally, there was a non–statistically significant decrease in median DE at 3 months (−3.75 mg; P = 0.285) and no change in median DE from baseline to 6 months (−0 mg; P = 0.833). Conclusion and Relevance: Over the course of this 6-month retrospective study, patients using medical cannabis for intractable pain experienced a significant reduction in the number of MMEs available to use for pain control. No significant difference was noted in DE from baseline. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm or deny the opioid-sparing effects of medical cannabis when used to treat intractable pain.

Our aim was to review the efficacy, safety, and pharmacology of brexanolone (Zulresso), a new antidepressant with a novel mechanism of action, in the treatment of postpartum depression (PPD). Pertinent data and information were obtained via PubMed (1993 to August 2018). Articles published in English that evaluated the safety and efficacy of brexanolone and other off‐label PPD treatments were included. Literature regarding epidemiology and pathophysiology of PPD was also selected. Brexanolone, administered as an intravenous infusion over 60 hours, produced a statistically significant and clinically meaningful reduction in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM‐D) scores compared with placebo at both 60 and 90 μg/kg/hour in patients with moderate to severe PPD. Brexanolone groups had higher response and remission rates compared with placebo. Common adverse effects were somnolence, dizziness, and headache. A small percentage (4%) of patients required cessation of therapy due to excessive sedation or loss of consciousness. Although the evidence for brexanolone as a novel treatment for PPD looks promising, a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) program requirement and the logistics of prolonged infusions serve as barriers to treatment. A discussion of these obstacles as well as pharmacokinetics, monitoring, and dosing is provided. Brexanolone is a novel antidepressant indicated for the treatment of PPD. Clinical trials demonstrated that brexanolone significantly reduces depression scores in women with moderate to severe PPD. Due to risk of oversedation and loss of consciousness, a REMS program will be put in place to mitigate the risk of adverse events.

Objective To describe a case of a patient who developed psychosis after ingestion of Vertigoheel for treatment of dizziness. Case Summary A 28-year-old male with no psychiatric history presented with 5 days of worsening depression and psychosis. He denied current use of prescription medications, alcohol, or illicit substances. Approximately 2 weeks prior, while visiting family in Germany, he developed dizziness. A provider in Germany prescribed Vertigoheel, 1 tablet to be taken every hour until symptom improvement. This did not improve his dizziness but did cause him to feel as if he were “in a dream.” He stopped taking the medication after 2 days but continued to feel amotivated with decreased appetite and insomnia. Several days later, he developed ego-dystonic auditory hallucinations. He returned to the United States; was admitted to an inpatient psychiatric unit for 4 days; and given olanzapine 5 mg at bedtime, lorazepam 1 mg every evening, and melatonin 6 mg every evening. He experienced gradual improvement in symptoms and was discharged with olanzapine 5 mg daily and outpatient follow-up. Discussion Vertigoheel is a homeopathic preparation containing ambra grisea, Cocculus indicus, Conium maculatum, and petroleum. Psychosis was not reported in any of the randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of Vertigoheel for treatment of vertigo. A literature search revealed no published reports of psychosis as a result of administration of any components of Vertigoheel. Conclusion A possible causal relationship was observed between the homeopathic supplement Vertigoheel and an acute episode of psychosis in a young male patient with no comorbidities.

Introduction Teledentistry is an innovative health care delivery platform that can potentially improve oral health access and outcomes. The purpose of this study was to predict teledentistry utilization intentions of U.S. adults using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) as a framework. Methods This mixed-method, cross-sectional study surveyed 899 participants from two independent samples in August and September 2021. Convenience samples of Minnesota State Fair attendees and ResearchMatch volunteers completed electronic surveys to identify the behavioral intention (BI) for teledentistry use within the next 6 months. Independent variables were the UTAUT constructs of performance expectancy (PE), effort expectancy (EE), social influence (SI), and facilitating conditions (FC). Data were analyzed using univariate analysis and multiple linear regression adjusting for age, gender and educational level. Qualitative analysis used thematic analysis using UTAUT as a coding framework. Results Univariate analysis showed statistical significance between each construct with BI ( P < 0.0001). Adjusted multiple linear regression revealed statistical significance between PE and SI with BI ( P < 0.0001). Qualitative responses corroborated quantitative results and revealed a lack of teledentistry knowledge. Conclusion The majority of participants indicated an intention not to use teledentistry within the next 6 months. The lack of prior experience of telehealth or teledentistry use in addition to lack of knowledge regarding teledentistry may contribute to these results. Future interventions to improve the BI to use teledentistry may benefit from focusing on PE and SI constructs for educational and marketing strategies.

Introduction A risk of amphetamine use is amphetamine-induced psychosis (AIP). Symptoms of AIP include hallucinations, delusions, and agitation. While AIP may resolve with abstinence from amphetamines, antipsychotics are commonly used despite not being FDA approved. The primary objective of this study was to compare length of stay (LOS) for patients with AIP treated with antipsychotics vs untreated. Secondary aims were to determine antipsychotic prescribed, proportion of patients utilizing as needed doses, time to initiation, and readmissions. Methods A retrospective chart review conducted at an academic medical center identified adult participants who were diagnosed with AIP, admitted to inpatient psychiatry service, and had a urine drug screen (UDS) positive for amphetamines. Patients were excluded if they were already taking an antipsychotic, had active prescriptions for amphetamine salts, or were in the emergency department for more than 48 hours. Demographics were assessed with descriptive statistics. Length of stay was compared between treatment groups using Kruskal-Wallis. Secondary aims were assessed using chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis. Results Sixty-nine patients were included. Median LOS for patients treated with antipsychotics (n = 35) was longer than untreated patients (n = 34), (5 days vs 2.5 days, P = .001). Type of antipsychotic used and time to initiation of antipsychotic were not found to affect LOS. There was no difference in readmissions rates and positive UDS on readmission between groups. Conclusion This study found patients with scheduled antipsychotics for AIP had a longer LOS than patients who did not receive scheduled antipsychotics. Future studies are needed to evaluate antipsychotic use in AIP.