Background Trichomoniasis commonly affects women of childbearing age and has been linked to several adverse birth outcomes.Objective To elucidate the association between trichomoniasis in pregnant women and adverse birth outcomes, including preterm delivery, prelabour rupture of membranes and low birthweight.Search strategy MEDLINE, EMBASE and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched in December 2020 without time or language restrictions.Selection criteria Original research studies were included if they assessed at least one of the specified adverse birth outcomes in pregnant women with laboratory-diagnosed trichomoniasis.Data collection and analysis Estimates from included articles were either extracted or calculated and then pooled to produce a combined estimate of the association of trichomoniasis with each adverse birth outcome using the random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 statistic and Cochran's Q test.Main results Literature search produced 1658 publications after removal of duplicates (n = 770), with five additional publications identified by hand search. After screening titles and abstracts for relevance, full text of 84 studies was reviewed and 19 met inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Significant associations were found between trichomoniasis and preterm delivery (OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.08-1.50), prelabour rupture of membranes (OR 1.87; 95% CI 1.53-2.29) and low birthweight (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.15-3.91).Conclusions Trichomoniasis in pregnant women is associated with preterm delivery, prelabour rupture of membranes and low birthweight. Rigorous studies are needed to determine the impact of universal trichomoniasis screening and treatment during pregnancy on reducing perinatal morbidity.

Background: Screening for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) among men has not been recommended because feasibility and efficacy are unknown. Check It is a seek-test-treat community-based Ct screening program for African American men who have sex with women and who are 15 to 24 years of age. This is an evaluation of adaptations made to the program aimed at improving index/partner notification and treatment rates. Methods:The original Check It intervention included free testing and treatment, contact tracing performed by a third party, expedited index therapy, and expedited partner therapy via pharmacy pickup. The intervention was adapted after a series of in-depth interviews eliciting information to refine the program. Changes included continuity of testing, notification, and treatment by the same staff; expanded hours; and patient-delivered partner therapy with a medication mail-delivery option. Rates of index male and partner treatment were compared using log-binomial models and generalized estimating equations.Results: Men in the adapted intervention (n = 85) were more likely than men in the original intervention (n = 99) to be contacted (relative risk [RR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.27), make a treatment plan (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01-1.27), and complete treatment (RR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.20-1.75). Female sexual partners were significantly more likely to complete treatment in postadaptation (n = 153) compared with preadaptation (n = 161; RR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.81-5.05).Conclusions: Compared with third-party notification and expedited index therapy/expedited partner therapy available by pharmacy pickup only, patient-delivered partner therapy with mail-delivery option, staff available at nontraditional hours, and staff continuity across testing, notification, and treatment significantly improved index and partner treatment completion.

Background: COVID-19 stay-at-home orders enacted in New Orleans, LA on March 16, 2020, may have caused changes in the way young men interacted with sex partners.Methods: An online substudy was conducted (May 21, 2020 to June 9, 2020) among Black men who have sex with women, 18 years and older, and who had previously enrolled in the parent study Check It (May 17, 2017 to March 6, 2020) to assess changes in sexual behavior during the stay-at-home orders.Results: Among 111 participants, from enrollment in Check It to during stay-at-home orders, recent vaginal sex declined from 96.4% to 47.8% (P < 0.0001), reports of multiple female sex partners declined from 45.0% to 14.4% (P < 0.0001), and sexual abstinence increased from 3.6% to 38.7% (P < 0.0001). Among those who did have vaginal sex, condomless sex rates did not change between enrollment in Check It and the substudy (64.5% vs 67.9%, P = 0.68). During stay-at-home orders oral sex, virtual sex, and pornography viewing were 40.5%, 42.3%, and 76.6%, respectively. Some (17.1%) acquired a new sex partner during stay-at-home orders, and 44.1% left their home to meet a partner for sex. Only 27.9% had seen information about safe sex during the pandemic. Income was diminished for 62.2% and 23.4% moved away from New Orleans when stay-at-home orders were enacted.

Background: Check It is a novel, bundled, community-based seek, test, and treat Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) screening program for 15-to 24-year-old Black men in New Orleans who have sex with women. The program design addressed barriers and facilitators to Ct screening/ treatment by enlisting trusted community partners, incorporating participant input, providing free index/partner expedited treatment, developing relatable marketing materials and an educational Web site, encouraging peer referral, and providing a modest monetary incentive.Methods: Areas of high poverty were identified using census data; ethnographic/key informant interviews identified sites in those areas where the target population congregated. Black youth informed Web site design and social marketing. Content was inspirational/educational/amusing and endorsed recruitment and brand awareness. A community advisory board, participant interviews, community partner feedback, and recruitment staff involvement in the process evaluation helped refine the program in an ongoing manner.Results: During formative stages, 41 key informant/community advisory board members informed program refinement. Community partners provided venue locations (n = 65) and participant referrals. Between May 22, 2017, and February 28, 2020, 1890 men were enrolled (acceptance rate, 96.0%) with Ct infection rate of 10.2%. Overall study treatment was provided to 86.1% (71.4%-90.9%) of participants who tested positive and 28.5% (14.5%-41.5%) of their partners. Findings from in-depth interviews with participants (n = 43) led to increased treatment uptake.Conclusions: C. trachomatis community screening of young Black men was successful through collaboration with trusted community partners, by tailoring implements/marketing with participant input, reducing barriers to treatment, and providing modest monetary incentives. The Check It program can serve as a roadmap for reducing health disparities in this population.

ObjectiveChlamydia trachomatis (Ct) is the most commonly reported sexually transmitted infection in the USA and causes important reproductive morbidity in women. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend routine screening of sexually active women under age 25 but not among men. Despite three decades of screening women, chlamydia prevalence in women remains high. Untested and untreated men can serve as a reservoir of infection in women, and male-screening based intervention can be an effective strategy to reduce infection in women. We assessed the impact of screening men on the Ct prevalence in women.DesignWe created an individual-based network model to simulate a realistic chlamydia epidemic on sexual contact networks for a synthetic population (n=5000). The model is calibrated to the ongoing routine screening among African American (AA) women in the USA and detailed a male-screening programme, Check It, that bundles best practices for Ct control. We used sensitivity analysis to quantify the relative importance of each intervention component.SettingCommunity-based venues in New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.ParticipantsHeterosexual AA men, aged 15 to 24, who had sex with women in the past 2 months.InterventionVenue-based screening, expedited index treatment, expedited partner treatment and rescreening.ResultsWe estimate that by annually screening 7.5% of the AA male population in the age-range, the chlamydia prevalence would be reduced relatively by 8.1% (95% CI 5.9% to 10.4%) in AA women and 8.8% (95% CI 6.9% to 10.8%) in AA men. Each man screened could prevent 0.062 (95% CI 0.030 to 0.094) cases in men and 0.204 (95% CI 0.143 to 0.267) cases in women. The model suggested the importance of intervention components ranked from high to low as venue-based screening, expedited index treatment, expedited partner treatment and rescreening.ConclusionThe findings indicated that male-screening has the potential to substantially reduce the prevalence among women in high-prevalence communities.